Someone asked me what my favorite growth hack of my career was: For one of my projects, I incorporated the company as “Tap Get Inc”—so it would say Tap Get next to the download button

Gemini 3.2 Flash - Capitalizing on DeepMind's clever distillation techniques... Rumors are that benchmarks show it's hitting 92% of GPT 5.5's performance on coding and reasoning tasks while being 15-20x cheaper on inference costs. The latency improvements are insane - sub-200ms for most queries. Google's distillation + sparsity techniques are paying off massively. They've essentially compressed a frontier model into a flash variant without the usual quality cliff.

Open-source AI is ruthlessly out-innovating the trillion-dollar monopolies. 🚀 Big labs are burning billions brute-forcing AGI on massive GPU clusters. Meanwhile, the open ecosystem is structurally forced to innovate on inference—and it's working. Look at what just happened: - DeepSeek v4 using SSDs for KV cache. - Breakthroughs like TurboQuant and Kimi K2 are aggressively compressing memory and driving the cost of intelligence to near zero. When you don't have infinite compute, you actually have to engineer better solutions. Constraints breed miracles. By solving the KV cache bottleneck, scrappy open-source builders are creating vastly cheaper and more profitable AI than the bloated closed-source giants. Hacker culture > GPU monopolies. Period.

I’ve been holding $ZAMM since last year. Never sold. Then I checked the TAC airdrop. Not eligible. At first I thought maybe I missed something. But the more I looked into it, the less it made sense. If ZORG is basically staked ZAMM — if it represents ZAMM that has been deposited into the DAO — then why were long-term ZAMM holders not included in the snapshot? That’s the part I can’t accept. I didn’t buy late. I didn’t farm and dump. I didn’t rotate in after the hype. I held ZAMM the whole time. But now the answer is: you didn’t stake it into ZORG, so you don’t count. Then what exactly was ZAMM supposed to represent? If ZORG = staked ZAMM, why does the snapshot recognize ZORG but ignore the original ZAMM holders? If the goal was to reward the real early supporters, shouldn’t ZAMM holders have been included by default? The way this played out makes it feel like the old pool provided liquidity, while the new entry point captured all the rights. If you didn’t follow the exact path later designed by the team, you could hold from last year until now and still be left out. That’s not just “missing the rules.” That’s realizing after months of holding that your position was not recognized when it actually mattered. ZAMM → ZORG → TACIT looks clean from the outside. But for long-term ZAMM holders who never staked, it feels very different. You say $ZORG is staked $ZAMM. Then why was my ZAMM, held for this long, not in the snapshot? That is the real issue. So when people say the pool got drained, I’m not surprised. In DeFi, liquidity providers often look like early supporters, but in the end they become exit liquidity. They take the volatility, the impermanent loss, the opportunity cost, and the waiting. Then a new narrative comes along, and the rights move somewhere else. I’m done participating in these kinds of activities. Not because I missed an airdrop and got emotional. Because this kind of structure makes the whole thing feel pointless. Old users can accept risk. What we can’t accept is holding through everything, only to find out later that the rules were never really on our side.