Andrew Tate(@Cobratate) deposited 20,950 $HYPE ($1.87M) into #Binance# today. He bought 122,827 $HYPE ($550K) at just $4.48 ~2 years ago and still holds 63,550 $HYPE ($5.62M). He has made a total profit of $7.24M on $HYPE, with a 1,317% return.

.@AndrewYang reveals 3 big ideas for how AI's new billionaires should spend hundreds of billions in philanthropy: "I'm going to put three big ideas out there. The first is trying to build an economy of the future that people can see themselves in that serves human flourishing." "There are 200,000 media, arts, and creativity jobs that have evaporated in the last four years. Imagine if you had an arts and creativity currency, and then a health and wellness currency. At this point we should all be getting paid to go to the gym, not paying." "The second category: a techie said to me, 'Isn't trying to get our government and its $4 trillion budget working more efficiently the highest leverage use of my philanthropic dollar?' And I said, 'Ding, ding, ding. That's right.'" "You have a $4 trillion budget, you make it 10% more efficient, that's 400 billion a year, which is real money compared to even the richest of the people out there." "I actually have a third spiel. Bill Gross, Idealab founder, has started 175 companies. He's going to make an announcement in 18 days that could be an avenue for billions of dollars of very, very effective philanthropy, like a golden age of entrepreneurship." @Fwd_Party

.@AndrewYang has one message for Silicon Valley: you need to help the rest of America get ready for what’s coming. "Building the future is hard work. And then trying to make it so that the rest of the country doesn't get super mad or sad, I know it's extra, but we kinda need you to help us do that too." "One of the things I said when I was running was, 'Look, it's not the innovator's responsibility to figure out all of the downstream impacts of the innovation. In theory, that's government's responsibility, and our government is asleep at the switch, and so some of the stuff is coming back on you.'" "Some of that, in my opinion, is unfair." "We still do need your help by coming clean about what you think is going to happen with this technology and maybe even helping fix the broken political mechanisms and systems so that we can actually make it a good environment for innovation, not an angry, unreasonable, hostile one."

.@AndrewYang reveals his path to an independent president by 2029, starting with just 3 senators holding the balance of power: "What if I were to tell you that there could be three independent US senators in January of 2027? That could be a fulcrum." "You could have a 49, 49 Senate, and then two in the middle or even three in the middle. And the three senators in the middle form a fulcrum of common sense." "There are two US Senate candidates right now in Idaho and South Dakota that are running as independents, and the Democrats dropped out of the race in both of those states." "You could have an independent president and cabinet and fulcrum in the Senate by beginning of 2029, if everything were to go incredibly well." "50% of Americans say they're independent. Democrats and Republicans are both at around 25% each, and neither major party is going to solve any of the most pressing problems of our time." "It's not gonna be the Democratic Party. It's not gonna be the Republican Party. So it's gotta be Americans rising up and saying, 'It's not left or right, but forward.'" @Fwd_Party

.@AndrewYang on why AI growth won’t reach most Americans without UBI: "AI is going to increase GDP and economic output very substantially. And right now GDP's at 84,000 a head. It's gonna pass 90 and then 100,000 a head, and then keep on going." "The problem is that most Americans are not going to feel that in their own lives. They might see a number on a TV screen somewhere, but the money isn't gonna flow to them." "I was saying $1,000 a month in 2020. Now that would be 1,250 a month, adjusted for inflation." "That would be a game changer to millions of Americans. 1,250 a month would get the boot off their throat. And do I think that's enough? Do I think we should be doing more? I do. But I'd love to have that as a foundation or a floor." "Right now we're in a bit of a bind where the work is going to be done by machines, and machines aren't gonna pay taxes, and then humans are gonna lose their jobs. And when we work, we do pay taxes." "You're going to be in the worst of all worlds where the value is going someplace else. We're not gonna see taxable revenue, and then the tax base is going to shrink." @Fwd_Party

.@AndrewYang on how to actually "tax AI, not humans": "Dario Amodei said tax tokens. He suggested a 3% token tax. I'm gonna suggest that might be a little low, but his mechanism at least is great." "You could tax the compute layer, and I think that's an effective proxy for AI." "The other thing I'm going to suggest we're way behind the curve on, if we did this it would actually solve most of the problem, is we should have a value-added tax in the US which would, by the way, capture AI, capture compute." "It's really straightforward for a multinational tech company to not pay meaningful income tax in America. You can just push all your income through Ireland. And you can't wriggle out of a value-added tax." "We're still the richest market. We're the number one consumer market. Obviously, it's not a realistic threat for a US company to be like, 'We're not gonna sell there.'" "A value-added tax at even half the European level, because our economy is so massive, our economy is at, let's call it 31 trillion or so, gets you maybe, like, 1.3 trillion, which would cover UBI almost in its totality." @Fwd_Party

Andrew S. Bi, MD from @nyulangone joins us to break down the play on which Brian Burns suffered a torn ACL in the Giants’ win over the Titans #sponsored# Watch full vid➡️:

Andrew Garfield reportedly went through roughly 35 laptops while filming the memorable breakdown scene in The Social Network. Director David Fincher repeatedly reshot the moment, determined to capture the exact frustration and emotional intensity needed for Eduardo Saverin’s confrontation. Fincher was famous for shooting scenes dozens of times in pursuit of precise performances and authentic reactions. Garfield had to portray Eduardo watching both a friendship and business partnership unravel before him. Despite the exhausting repetition behind the scenes, the finished sequence feels remarkably emotional, explosive, and spontaneous.