The US just moved to ban new foreign-made advanced robots. RoboStrategy's investment specialist @JacklouisP breaks down how to navigate this new regime. 0:00 Intro 0:22 What the FCC Ban Covers 1:35 Four Key Nuances 4:37 The Drone Ban: A Case Study 8:23 The Case For and Against 12:59 Conclusion

🚨BREAKING: The United States Senate has just voted to ban a Federal Reserve CBDC until the year 2030! 🇺🇸 “The Federal Reserve has no chance of issuing a digital dollar.” HUGE WIN FOR CRYPTO!

The Error in Banning the Nakba Day March Police wrongly want to ban a Palestine rally on Nakba Day on Friday but are allowing the right-wing’s anti-Islam rally the same say, writes Nailah Sharif, a retired London Metropolitan Police detective.

LATEST: 🇺🇸 Former CFTC Chair Timothy Massad says the US is quietly exploring CBDC infrastructure through the BIS's Project Agora despite a public pledge to ban a digital dollar.

Reuters reports that the Trump administration is preparing to block imports of new Chinese humanoid robots, robot dogs and certain power inverters. There is also a claim circulating on X that Chinese AI models will be banned today. But so far, I have not seen that confirmed in the Reuters report or by an official announcement. So I would treat that part as speculation for now. I get the security concern. A robot is no longer just a machine that moves. It has cameras, microphones, sensors and internet access. It could be operating inside a factory, laboratory, warehouse or even someone’s home. Power inverters are even less glamorous, but possibly more sensitive. They connect solar panels, batteries and other equipment to the electricity grid. If they can be remotely accessed or controlled, they become part of the national-security conversation. But here is the question I keep coming back to: How does America plan to build a competitive robotics industry without relying on China’s robotics supply chain? China installed 295,000 industrial robots in 2024—more than half of all the industrial robots installed worldwide that year. Four of the five largest humanoid-robot companies by 2025 installations were Chinese. China also has major advantages in many of the components robots need: permanent magnets, motors, batteries, bearings, power electronics and increasingly actuators and sensors. This does not mean every robot component is made in China. Japan, Germany, South Korea and other countries remain important suppliers. But China has something that is very difficult to reproduce: the factories, suppliers, engineers, component makers and customers are all close to one another. A robot company can design something, find parts, build a prototype, test it and move toward production much faster—and usually much more cheaply. So banning Chinese robots may solve one security problem, but it raises several others. Will American robotics companies still be allowed to buy Chinese components? Will the government invest enough to build alternative supply chains? Will these restrictions help American companies—or simply make robots more expensive and slow down adoption? And if the U.S. restricts Chinese robots while China continues deploying them across factories, warehouses and public services, who will collect more real-world data and improve faster? The U.S. may still have an advantage in the AI “brain.” China has a serious advantage in building the robotic “body.” You can ban a finished product quite quickly. Rebuilding the industrial ecosystem behind it is much harder.