I just love my babies! For Mothers Day this year they made me these jeans and they were so happy when they saw me wear their work or art! Every Mothers Day they have drawn on clothing for me that I will keep forever! . I love seeing their personalities shine through their art. You can tell which one of my kids drew on what side of these jeans. From Psalm’s foot and hand print to Saint’s soccer drawings, North’s backwards letters and Chi’s hearts…I will cherish these forever!

Our newest @goodamerican fit GOOD CURVE is the ultimate balancing jean and you’re going to LOVE!! So flattering on all body types! Just dropped in sizes 00-24 including our new Size 15 on #GoodSquad#

In Obsession, director avoided making Nikki look “possessed.” “We were very specific. I didn’t ever want her to play possessed. I wanted her to play like a jealous girlfriend.” Director Curry Barker encouraged the actress Inde Navarrette to “go home and make faces” in the mirror. She experimented with contortions, different voices, and expressions to build the possessed/shadow versions of Nikki “I prepared for the role of Nikki by just allowing myself to be unfiltered and raw with the way that there’s ugly emotions that we never want to show people”

I accidentally dropped my competitor's YouTube video into NotebookLM. It told me exactly why it went viral, what his audience still wanted that he never gave them, and wrote me a script built around that gap. Here's how you can do the same in 60 seconds: Open NotebookLM. Paste the URL of the highest-performing video in your niche. The one you have been quietly jealous of every time it shows up in your feed. First prompt: "What made this video work? Break down the hook, the pacing, the emotional peaks, and the exact moment the viewer decides to stay." It does not give you vague advice. It tells you which sentence landed hardest and why. It surfaces the structure underneath the style. Second prompt: "What gaps did this video leave? What did the audience want that this video never fully delivered?" The comments section of a million-view video is a product brief your competitor wrote for you without knowing it. NotebookLM reads it like a researcher and hands you a list of unmet needs you can build your next video around. Third prompt: "Generate five viral video ideas that cover the gaps you just identified. Give me the hook, the core argument, and the emotional payoff for each one." The ideas it gives you are not generic. They are built from the actual evidence of what your audience already wanted and did not get. Your competitor cannot reverse-engineer them, because they came from studying him. Fourth prompt: "Write me the first 60 seconds of the strongest idea. Make it hook harder than the video we just analyzed." Most YouTubers spend three weeks planning and one hour studying what actually performs. This workflow inverts that entirely. The creators winning right now are not better on camera. They are better at reading the evidence their competitors accidentally left behind. You just got the playbook.

There was a time in my career when my world revolved around going after the worst pimps and human traffickers abusing young women and children. For years, nothing else mattered except holding those responsible to account. Along the way, I lost relationships. I made mistakes. No one came before the mission. You try to influence the next generation of investigators to carry the work forward and do better than you did. After many years, I needed to step away psychologically. If you have ever pushed human trafficking cases through the courts, watched survivors and young people testify, and watched them be cross examined in ways that can feel cruel and devastating, you understand the impact it has on you as a police officer and as a human being. It is one area of policing that changes you forever. All police officers carry heaviness. All people do. Police leaders are no different. A few nights ago, my good friend and I grabbed late night Asian food. Just a regular cowboy and a typical Asian guy in jeans and T shirts testing our spice levels late at night. Without even realizing the impact, @paulbrandt challenged me to step back into the fight in a different way. The mental break was over. Thank you, Paul, for everything you continue to do for survivors and vulnerable people across this country. You have my commitment. And I am fortunate to have an incredible team of investigators in London carrying this work forward every day. Stay tuned. #MentalHealthAwarenessMonth# #humantrafficking# #NotInMyCity#

Today is the start of a very important day in the AI world... the trial between Elon and Sam/OpenAI begins today in Oakland Federal Court. The jury selection is happening right now in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and opening arguments are expected Tuesday. The civil jury trial is projected to last 2-4 weeks, with Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers making the final call. So let me tell you why this fight all came about. 1/ In 2015 Elon co-founded OpenAI with Sam Altman and others as a nonprofit to develop artificial general intelligence safely and openly for the benefit of all humanity... this was supposed to NOT be for profit or for closed corporate control. Elon was a major early funder, contributing around $38-44 million (~60% of early seed funding) plus resources like compute and recruiting. 2/ Then, Elon left the board in 2018 over disagreements for the direction of the company and Microsoft’s growing role of the company. 3/ Later, OpenAI took billions from Microsoft, restructured with a for-profit arm, initially “capped profit,” now more commercial... went closed-source in practice, and exploded in value with ChatGPT. FYI, the current valuation of OpenAI now sits at ~$852 billion and the company recently completed restructuring with a for-profit entity reporting into a nonprofit foundation. Now, with the trial, Elon is saying Altman, Brockman, and OpenAI breached the founding charitable trust and agreement by turning it into a “wealth machine” that prioritizes profits and insiders over the original mission. He claims they deceived him about their plans... This lawsuit was originally filed in November 2024, was withdrawn, and then revived in early 2026. And just this Friday, April 24, Elon voluntarily dropped the fraud claims to “streamline” the case and keep the jury focused on the mission issue... proceeding on breach of charitable trust and unjust enrichment. This is what Elon is looking to get back from Sam and OpenAI: a/ substantial damages, with stakes in the $100B+ range, with many reports saying it's in the range of ~$134B and the winnings will be given to the nonprofit/charity arm and will NOT benefit Elon personally b/ possible unwinding/restructuring to restore the original nonprofit mission c/ leadership changes (e.g., getting rid of Altman/Brockman from key roles). On the other side, OpenAI is claiming: a/ Elon knew about and once supported commercialization steps, saying he even explored merging with Tesla or gaining control himself b/ OpenAI calls the suit competitive sabotage from rival Elon's company xAI and says this is driven by jealousy over OpenAI’s success This is SUCH an important trial in the world of AI... people may not fully understand. The reason is bc Elon has repeatedly warned that profit-driven, closed-source AGI is very dangerous. This is his chance to enforce the original “benefit humanity” mission he helped create and walked away from in 2018. A big win will hurt OpenAI’s valuation, upcoming IPO plans, Microsoft partnership, and market dominance/customer perspective of the company... and this will also force real changes in how the world’s leading AI lab operates, influencing the entire AI race and future regulations. For me, Sam Altman straight up CANNOT be trusted with the future of AGI, and this trial proves why Elon was right to fight it. This is the same guy who got fired by his own board in 2023 for not being “consistently candid,” then crawled back in and turned the nonprofit “open for humanity” promise into a closed-source, Microsoft-bankrolled profit machine worth hundreds of billions. Elon was the one who put up the early cash and vision to keep AI safe and beneficial for all of us... not to create a trillion-dollar insider club. If Altman gets away with rewriting the rules after the fact, it sets a dangerous precedent that mission-driven tech is just marketing fluff. I believe Elon isn’t doing this for ego or rivalry... he’s really doing it bc someone has to hold the line before profit-over-people AGI becomes unstoppable. This one’s personal for the man who actually wants to understand the universe instead of just cashing in on it. Humanity needs Elon to win. And that's who I'm rooting for!

JUST IN: The U.S. military carried out “self-defense strikes” in southern Iran Monday, targeting missile launch sites and Iranian boats in the Strait of Hormuz. CENTCOM says the strikes were launched after Iranian forces were spotted laying mines in the Strait of Hormuz and a missile site targeted U.S. warplanes during an already fragile ceasefire in the region.