Historical founders of modern science who were theists
These framed their science as reading "God's book of nature,".
Isaac Newton — devout but heterodox (anti-Trinitarian); wrote more on theology than physics.
Johannes Kepler — saw planetary laws as discovering the Creator's geometry.
Galileo — held that scripture and nature can't truly conflict.
Robert Boyle — father of modern chemistry; funded lectures defending Christianity.
Michael Faraday & James Clerk Maxwell — both serious Christians (Faraday a Sandemanian).
Gregor Mendel — Augustinian friar, founder of genetics.
Georges Lemaître — Catholic priest who proposed the Big Bang.
Blaise Pascal — mathematician; the Pensées and the famous "wager."
Show more
We know curiously little about the first female, Eve:
> never heard from her
> no data on her life
> manufactured from man
> was second
> is to blame
Eve is our foundational concept of a woman, yet she is not legible.
Why?
For 1,400 years, humanity was confused about planets too. When the ancient Greeks looked up to the sky, they saw some lights (stars) appeared fixed, while other lights (planets) moved erratically. They couldn’t understand why. From their vantage point, Mars would stop, reverse, loop backward, and then resume. Planets were bewildering, called "wanderers".
To Greek physicians, the womb was also perplexing. They taught that the womb moved freely, a restless wanderer inside the body.
They looked up at the sky, and at a woman, and concluded the same thing: they are erratic and wandering.
To resolve this planetary madness, astronomers spent 1,400 years trying to understand. They used complicated models, overlaying circles onto circles (epicycles).
Then, Copernicus and Kepler figured it out.
Two insights solved over 1,400 years of bad explanations. It turns out the observed was not fixed, and the orbits were ellipses, not perfect circles.
Our bewilderment about female health only means it is yet to be understood. There’s a reframe waiting to happen.
In the fifth century BCE, Polykleitos sculpted the male body as a system of ideal mathematical proportion. Setting the historical trajectory for the “ideal” body. This passed through Vitruvius and then was immortalized by Da Vinci.
This is how the default template of the human body was established.
The male body was chosen because it held still, not because it was superior. It lacked the cyclical, "erratic", misunderstood shifts of the female body.
Perhaps it's time for another reframe.
In the next 90 days, Kate will become the most measured female in history. Three of her menstrual cycles (orbits) will be meticulously tracked.
> 1,900 biomarkers tracked
> 14.8 million data points
> 100 tasks a day
> 6-10 hours a day
> 50+ devices
> brain, taste, smell, and more
> 3 menstrual cycles
The effort will reveal new insight into female health, though that’s not really the primary objective here.
Kate is trying to become legible.
First to herself, and then to others.
Show more
Kelper upgrades $XFAB to "Buy" citing:
- Melexis demand strengthening “week-after-week, day-after-day” (their lead customer).
- AI giving XFAB a structural growth leg with SiC, GaN, and photonics offsetting auto cyclicality.
- Scarce Western speciality foundries like $SILEX commanding higher multiples.
"X-Fab remains the cheapest specialty foundry peer on every multiple, trading at 4.8x 2027 EV/EBITDA versus a peer median of 14.5x"
I treat this as good signal for the core fundamentals improving like auto players.
But in terms of unpriced long term growth vectors, I'm personally looking at XFAB from a different angle in terms of photonics growth with photonixfab. Given $NVDA as a potential key driver.
But it's hard for traditional firms to price these types of active developments into valuation models until there's volume contracts.
Show more