Although Noxa has stopped issuing new tokens, I don't think it's a major problem if the Robinhood community continues to value the OG narrative. New narratives can always launch on other platforms, but OG narratives can still be traded through Noxa. After all, previously deployed tokens can still migrate successfully, with liquidity moving to Unicorn. So in my view, this doesn't fundamentally change much for existing tokens. Ultimately, the market will decide how to price this. Right now, a lot of retail traders and KOLs are panic selling. As for me, I'm buying a bit more of these so-called "trash coins" and holding them for another week to see how the market reacts. Maybe I'm right. Maybe I'm wrong. If I'm wrong, I'll pay for my own bag.

everyone kept asking if noxa's "pause" was temporary. bots, spam, they'll be back, etc. the treasury already answered that in july. between late june and july 14, treasury.noxa.eth wound its liquidity down. ~185 WETH out via the chain's burn/bridge path, ~11.7m CASHCAT moved through PoolManager, plus USDG and the rest. then on july 14 the wallet goes silent. nothing since. being clear: none of this is a rug. the WETH path is how everyone bridges out on this chain, the CASHCAT went to the pool contract. it's a wind-down, not a theft. but a wind-down is the point. this wasn't a pause. the treasury was emptied and parked three weeks ago. onchain, noxa already left. check it yourself: treasury 0x71f2F1c2dc94cDaBFE29Cb355119f8683AE0969b poolmanager 0x8366a39CC670B4001A1121B8F6A443A643e40951

Launchpads are a winner take most on each chain so far. Noxa is dead $PONS is currently 1/3 of the chain volume and will continue to rise and take market share from all. @ponsdotfamily is currently burning supply based on usage and has burned 20%+ in addition it’s on a 70% retrace If you think this is the launchpad to win, this is a generational opportunity.

I think $Pons is a cycle winner And right now, Pons has dipped 50% because of rotations and short-lived fud. - RWA on different launchpads - Bonk Launch of Circus - Noxa fake comeback - Attacks on the site - PF coins going up But zooming out, those things have already been resolved: - RWA coming in v2 - Circus is not a real competitor - Noxa was fake fud, but exacerbated the dip - Ozzy handling the attacks and showing competence - PF coins will always fluctuate So, looking past the recent fud, I see a lot to be bullish on. For starters, I believe people are completely misreading how valuable the #1# launchpad on RH is worth with the amount of money ETH whales have to contribute. The @ponsdotfamily community is extremely aligned which I feel is not priced in. This dip is great because it is allowing for a lot of great people to enter and increase their positions. Pons has not done any buy backs in over 15 hours and now has over 300 $ETH ($550k) available to use. @MEADGod published v2 titled "Communitymaxxing" that's packed with great updates: - CTOs - RWA Pairs - Reflection tokens - Exclusively non-token asset (no more devs dumping) Having Ozzy lead this charge is incredible, as he has shown to ship extremely fast, understands the trenches, and knows how to communicate. IMO, $Pons is positioned to be a cycle winner

Two days ago Bonk launched their launchpad. The Pons eco dipped. The dumb money sold and chased. The smart money bought the Pons dip. Fast forward to today Bonk's Circus is irrelevant. Today Noxa relaunches. The Pons eco is on a dip. The dumb money is selling to chase. The smart money is buying the Pons dip.

'Robinhood chain is dead on arrival' 'bonk guy keeps screaming about it because he got paid' that's basically all i've heard since i started talking about the chain over the past two weeks meanwhile, i'm up over 500% (more than $300k) in a week from a $67k investment in $PONS, the leading launchpad on Robinhood chain the funny part? people said i was 'late' interesting story: $PONS was first shilled to me in a trenches chat around a $300k market cap while Noxa was still the dominant launchpad i ignored it because i had too much going on and was being pitched dozens of new tokens every day the moment Noxa announced it was shutting down, i realized $PONS had a real shot at becoming the chain's dominant launchpad by then, it was already around a $4m market cap most people would've called that 'too late' especially since they originally faded it at such a low market cap i thought differently i bought it around $4m market cap i.e. 13x higher than when i first saw it! i bought more around $9m after my conviction increased then i bought even more around $6.5m on the pullback after today, i'm still up more than 500% on my average entry the lesson? people love calling everything 'too late' instead of simply looking at the data: • Robinhood chain has been one of the hottest and most active blockchains in crypto since its launch • the largest token on the chain has only reached around a $200m market cap • the leading launchpad controls roughly 67% market share, launches around 10,000 tokens every day, and is still only around a $28m market cap • there still hasn't been a single $500m runner on the chain to me, that doesn't look like a chain that is too late or dying soon it looks early you can be an armchair critic predicting every new trend will die because the last one did or you can study the data and position accordingly FOR THE CURIOUS: the screenshot in this post is from the FOMO app, where i first entered my $PONS position i've been taking a lot more trades there recently, including higher-risk trades that i don't post anywhere else if that's your thing, you can follow me there:

i got two things wrong on-chain this week. both are traps anyone digging on robinhood chain will hit, so here they are. tokens sent to 0x000 are not always burned. i saw a treasury send 185 WETH to the null address and read it as burning. it isn't. on this chain that's how you bridge value out. sixteen different addresses do it, one of them 1,900 times. if a pattern shows up across dozens of wallets it's chain mechanics, not a finding. reverted calls still show up in the history. i pulled a deployer's inflows and summed the msg.value. 4,879 ETH. except launches had already been disabled and bots kept hammering the same call anyway. those transactions failed. the money never arrived. the sum was real, what it meant wasn't. the bonus one: the "creator" field is not a person. blockscout listed 0xD9eC as the creator of $WALLET. that's the noxa factory contract, because the token launched through the pad. the address that actually pushed the button is different. @mirror_web3 and @whisper_alpha caught 1 and 3. i'd have carried both further if they hadn't. the fix isn't being more careful, it's asking before concluding. every one of these looked like a story until someone explained the mechanic.