Although Noxa has stopped issuing new tokens, I don't think it's a major problem if the Robinhood community continues to value the OG narrative. New narratives can always launch on other platforms, but OG narratives can still be traded through Noxa. After all, previously deployed tokens can still migrate successfully, with liquidity moving to Unicorn. So in my view, this doesn't fundamentally change much for existing tokens. Ultimately, the market will decide how to price this. Right now, a lot of retail traders and KOLs are panic selling. As for me, I'm buying a bit more of these so-called "trash coins" and holding them for another week to see how the market reacts. Maybe I'm right. Maybe I'm wrong. If I'm wrong, I'll pay for my own bag.

everyone kept asking if noxa's "pause" was temporary. bots, spam, they'll be back, etc. the treasury already answered that in july. between late june and july 14, treasury.noxa.eth wound its liquidity down. ~185 WETH out via the chain's burn/bridge path, ~11.7m CASHCAT moved through PoolManager, plus USDG and the rest. then on july 14 the wallet goes silent. nothing since. being clear: none of this is a rug. the WETH path is how everyone bridges out on this chain, the CASHCAT went to the pool contract. it's a wind-down, not a theft. but a wind-down is the point. this wasn't a pause. the treasury was emptied and parked three weeks ago. onchain, noxa already left. check it yourself: treasury 0x71f2F1c2dc94cDaBFE29Cb355119f8683AE0969b poolmanager 0x8366a39CC670B4001A1121B8F6A443A643e40951

Launchpads are a winner take most on each chain so far. Noxa is dead $PONS is currently 1/3 of the chain volume and will continue to rise and take market share from all. @ponsdotfamily is currently burning supply based on usage and has burned 20%+ in addition it’s on a 70% retrace If you think this is the launchpad to win, this is a generational opportunity.

“For nine years, there has been no additional marine protection.” 68th US Secretary of State, @JohnKerry discusses the importance of implementing protection for marine areas. #BloombergGreen# #ClimateWeekNYC# ⏯️

Today on MCG Trader Radio w/@cryptogle Ogle is the largest holder of Pons, discussed his $10M position and trading philosophy across the Robinhood ecosystem Highlights include: 02:07 – Ogle's background 04:59 – Why he skipped Noxa and picked Pons 09:27 – Why big holders can't easily sell 10:07 – Whether he'll OTC part of his position 11:33 – Pons has way more to go(His Thesis) 15:41 – Buyback/burn mechanics 19:03 – BSC comparison 21:00 – Robinhood onboarding 17M users 27:12 – Take on NetNet, Up 28:33 – Lighter as a Robinhood play 31:19 – "Last chance for retail" thesis 37:16 – Prism Thesis 47:32 – Advice for beginners 53:12 – AOL update 55:07 – Thoughts on Solana 01:00:26 – Retail's closing window 01:02:01 – How to reach him

I think $Pons is a cycle winner And right now, Pons has dipped 50% because of rotations and short-lived fud. - RWA on different launchpads - Bonk Launch of Circus - Noxa fake comeback - Attacks on the site - PF coins going up But zooming out, those things have already been resolved: - RWA coming in v2 - Circus is not a real competitor - Noxa was fake fud, but exacerbated the dip - Ozzy handling the attacks and showing competence - PF coins will always fluctuate So, looking past the recent fud, I see a lot to be bullish on. For starters, I believe people are completely misreading how valuable the #1# launchpad on RH is worth with the amount of money ETH whales have to contribute. The @ponsdotfamily community is extremely aligned which I feel is not priced in. This dip is great because it is allowing for a lot of great people to enter and increase their positions. Pons has not done any buy backs in over 15 hours and now has over 300 $ETH ($550k) available to use. @MEADGod published v2 titled "Communitymaxxing" that's packed with great updates: - CTOs - RWA Pairs - Reflection tokens - Exclusively non-token asset (no more devs dumping) Having Ozzy lead this charge is incredible, as he has shown to ship extremely fast, understands the trenches, and knows how to communicate. IMO, $Pons is positioned to be a cycle winner

Two days ago Bonk launched their launchpad. The Pons eco dipped. The dumb money sold and chased. The smart money bought the Pons dip. Fast forward to today Bonk's Circus is irrelevant. Today Noxa relaunches. The Pons eco is on a dip. The dumb money is selling to chase. The smart money is buying the Pons dip.

If you want to succeed, you have to make a lot of noise. That’s how people notice you and take a look. Without it, you’re as dead as a token that never graduated. @Boxa_Elysium, the ball is in your court. How you play it is up to you. Look at @ponsdotfamily. When the @Noxa_Fi mess happened, plenty of new launchpads tried to fill the gap, but none of them mattered. Pons took the stage because they never stopped grinding and building their community, and that’s essential right now. Or look at @Pumpfun and @LaunchOnSF . Why did Stonk thrive? Because people were sick of Pumpfun. Now we have @floatdotxyz , who are giving everything back to the trenches and becoming the people’s launchpad, with a HUGE traders’ pot of over $400,000. So ask yourselves: What are you doing? What problem are you solving? Are you here to stay and make the space better, or are you just another launchpad that wants to collect fees and disappear into the void? A reply back would be cool otherwise I will take the silence as what I think it is.

On paper, @Uniswap built the better launchpad on Robinhood Chain. Trading there costs 4x less, the tech is newer, and they've got the biggest distribution in DeFi behind them. Yet a launchpad called @ponsdotfamily is still outtrading them 3 to 1 on Robinhood. What's going on? Why this war matters This is all happening on @RobinhoodCrypto's own chain, and a lot of people expect Robinhood to be the Solana of next season. The early numbers back the hype: • 2.6M+ daily transactions • 200K+ daily active addresses • $300M+ in daily DEX volume Launchpads drive a big chunk of that activity. Everyone watched print on Solana last cycle, so if Robinhood really is the next home chain, whoever owns its launchpad owns one of the best businesses of the cycle. The incumbent Pons wasn't even the first king here. A launchpad called NOXA dominated the early days until it abruptly stopped issuing tokens on July 11, and Pons absorbed the entire market within days. At its peak, Pons processed 1.65M trades in a single day, more than half of all transactions on the whole chain. The challenger Then @Uniswap decided it wanted the market for itself. What's ironic is Pons is built on Uniswap's own rails, and Uniswap had featured it in their launchpad aggregator just six days before launching @TradePools to compete with it. This wasn't a quick money grab, it's a solid product: • Trading costs 0.25% instead of the 1% Pons charges • Fees compound straight back into each token's locked liquidity • Every token plugs into Uniswap's entire distribution surface on day one Hayden Adams framed it as a bet that users "will prefer quality tech and a level playing field." You'd expect Pools to eat this market inside a week. The result And for about 48 hours, it looked like they would. Pools out-launched Pons on day one, 10,506 new tokens against 7,210, and grabbed roughly half of all launchpad volume on the chain. Then attention shifted back home Six days in, Pons is back to around $50M a day while Pools sits near $15M, and not one of those ten thousand tokens has crossed a $10M market cap. Only two have even crossed $1M. Distribution bought Uniswap a spike in attention, but it couldn't buy retention. What actually wins So what's going on? Follow the money. Run $1M of volume through each platform: • Pons collects $10,000, hands $7,000 to the token's creator, and burns PONS with most of the rest • Pools collects $2,500, and the creator gets $500 if they even turned the fee on A creator earns 14x more per dollar of volume on Pons, and that one number explains everything. The 1% fee everyone calls extractive is really Pons paying its supply side. Creators shill their coins every day because their income depends on the volume, and holders evangelize because every trade burns PONS. Uniswap built the perfect product for traders and forgot that traders follow attention instead of creating it. So Pools got ten thousand tokens from people with zero reason to promote them past hour one, while Pons kept the tokens people actually fight over. The takeaway Launchpads are ATTENTION businesses, and the tech is table stakes. Pools is six days old, so this war isn't over, but winning it means out-paying Pons for the people who bring the crowd, not out-engineering them. So next time a launchpad war breaks out, skip the feature comparison and look at who's getting paid to fill the room. "Show me the incentives and I'll show you the outcome"