Game Freak programmer Fumiya Narita and University of Tokyo professor Takashi Kanai have unveiled a new technique for making water simulations much faster without sacrificing visual quality. The method, called Extended Quadtree Tall Cells, combines two previous techniques to reduce the amount of computation needed for detailed water effects. In tests, it delivered: -2.5–3x faster pressure calculations -Around 1.5x faster overall simulation -Fewer grid cells while keeping water visuals largely intact -Strong results in scenes with lots of small waves, such as rain The technique still has some limitations, including higher memory usage and reduced benefits in calmer water scenes. The researchers have not confirmed whether the techwill be used in a future Pokémon game.

Happy weekend fam, Post-Quantum Cryptography could become one of the next major security narratives in crypto. NIST has already finalized its first PQC standards, while Ethereum, Bitcoin and several other ecosystems are exploring how to prepare for quantum threats. I think this narrative deserves more attention, especially as AI and quantum computing continue to advance. Here's why: – most major blockchains still rely on elliptic-curve signatures, which could become vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers. – Shor's algorithm could potentially break these signatures, putting exposed public keys and associated funds at risk. – NIST has standardized PQC algorithms such as ML-DSA, SLH-DSA and ML-KEM, giving the industry a clearer path toward migration. – upgrading blockchain security could create demand for new wallets, custody solutions, signature systems and migration infrastructure. Ofc, this threat isn't expected to materialize overnight. No publicly demonstrated quantum computer can currently break Bitcoin or Ethereum's production signatures at scale. But preparing major blockchain networks could take years. 20 tokens I'm tracking around the Post-Quantum narrative: Post-Quantum Cryptography could become one of the next major security narratives in crypto. NIST has already finalized its first PQC standards, while Ethereum, Bitcoin and several other ecosystems are exploring how to prepare for quantum threats. I think this narrative deserves more attention, especially as AI and quantum computing continue to advance. Here's why: – most major blockchains still rely on elliptic-curve signatures, which could become vulnerable to sufficiently powerful quantum computers. – Shor's algorithm could potentially break these signatures, putting exposed public keys and associated funds at risk. – NIST has standardized PQC algorithms such as ML-DSA, SLH-DSA and ML-KEM, giving the industry a clearer path toward migration. – upgrading blockchain security could create demand for new wallets, custody solutions, signature systems and migration infrastructure. Ofc, this threat isn't expected to materialize overnight. No publicly demonstrated quantum computer can currently break Bitcoin or Ethereum's production signatures at scale. But preparing major blockchain networks could take years. 20 tokens I'm tracking around the Post-Quantum narrative: [1] base:0x37696cd8f723ce541ac376f79fc109080e505ba3 – quantum-resistant L1 using XMSS since 2018. [2] algorand:native – Falcon-based State Proofs already live, with broader PQ initiatives. [3] $CKB – flexible cryptographic architecture with PQ signature support. [4] abelian:native – PQ-focused L1 combining lattice-based cryptography and privacy. [5] $CELL – modular blockchain infrastructure focused on PQ cryptography. [6] $QANX – EVM-compatible blockchain developing PQ security. [7] $MCM – early PQ blockchain using WOTS+ signatures. [8] $NAORIS – decentralized security infrastructure focused on PQ protection. [9] $STRK – STARK proofs offer a quantum-resistant foundation, while account signatures remain a separate challenge. [10] $ZEC – privacy ecosystem exploring long-term cryptographic resilience. [11] $NXS – security-focused blockchain with signature-chain architecture. [12] $QUBIC – quantum computing-related ecosystem, with a less direct PQC investment thesis. [13] minima:native – decentralized blockchain with quantum-related security ambitions. [14] $QTC – Quantus, a PQ-focused blockchain project. [15] $FHE – Mind Network, focused on encrypted computation rather than native PQ signatures. [16] $QONE – quantum-security and migration-focused infrastructure. [17] $AME – smaller blockchain project associated with PQ security claims. [18] $GEEQ – security-focused blockchain infrastructure. [19] solana:AUuCEHQ7sm2i5GmaHrpE961voWcTY8U6mgrkhcV7pump – QuStream, a smaller project making quantum-security claims. [20] $TDC – Tidecoin, an early hash-based PQ blockchain project. These projects are at very different stages. Some already use PQ signatures, others offer partial protection, while several remain roadmap-driven or only indirectly exposed to the narrative. My view: I would prioritize projects with actual cryptographic implementations over those relying mainly on quantum-related marketing. base:0x37696cd8f723ce541ac376f79fc109080e505ba3 and algorand:native are worth a closer look from a technical perspective. $STRK is also interesting because of its STARK-based architecture, although quantum-resistant proofs alone don't make an entire blockchain quantum-safe. I also think established ecosystems such as $ETH could benefit from a successful transition toward PQ security. The real opportunity may extend beyond individual L1 tokens into wallets, custody, interoperability and security infrastructure.