Shell’s stance on diversity helps the energy giant comply with regulations in Europe and beyond. It’s also become central to legal challenges in the US. Read the full story: 📷: Shelby Tauber/Bloomberg

SHE PHOTOGRAPHED HIS TAG WHILE HE SAID HE WAS BROKEN DOWN!! Was she right to document a parked stranger on her street, or should she have asked first? A delivery driver asks a woman why she is taking pictures of him and his tag. He says he is broken down and delivering packages. She tells him she does not care and is taking pictures anyway. I get why a car sitting on a quiet street puts people on edge. Noticing something off is not the same as starting a fight, and that is how we'd put it to our boys. Photographing a license plate in public is legal. Asking if someone is okay, or if they need a tow, is the neighborly version of the same instinct. He hopped out and pressed her on it, and she doubled down instead of explaining. We want our boys to ask a question before they film a stranger. We also would not want them hopping out of a broken-down car to argue with someone walking down their own street. Both of them could have lowered the temperature: she could have said the car had been sitting, and he could have stayed put and waited for help. If you are worried, ask. If you are stuck, say so.

SHE OFFERED THE TWENTY BACK, SO WHY WAS SHE STILL ARGUING?? Press charges over a $20 tip jar, or let it go once she offered to pay it back? On police bodycam, servers tell an officer a woman took roughly $20 out of their tip jar and that the cameras caught it. The woman denies it, says she's being treated like she had a gun, and then offers $20 to make it go away. I'd press it, and I don't say that lightly. Tips aren't loose change on a counter. That's part of somebody's rent. Taking it from people working on their feet all day is about as low as small-time theft gets. What jumps out to my wife and me is the offer to pay it back while still saying she didn't do it. You can't have it both ways. In our house, the rule is you own it first and then you make it right, not the other way around. To be fair to her, it's $20 and a criminal record is heavy. If she'd apologized on the spot, I could see the servers taking the money and moving on. And the servers say her daughter was acting as a lookout, which we can't confirm from the clip, so that part is their claim. Owning it would have cost her a lot less than twenty bucks.

SHE LECTURED HIM AT THE PUMP, THEN PUT HER HANDS ON HIS CAR!! Was she right to say something about the environment, or did she lose the argument the second she touched his vehicle? A woman walks up on a man pumping gas, lectures him about the planet and keeps putting her hands on his car. When it gets sharper, she tells him maybe he should not have kids. You can care about the environment without treating a stranger's fill-up like your personal TED Talk. People are allowed to buy gas and drive their families around. What they are not required to do is stand there and take a sermon from someone who walked up uninvited. The hands on the car are the line. Once you start smacking somebody's vehicle, you have left speech and entered something that can turn into a real problem in a parking lot. And telling a man he maybe should not have kids is an ugly thing to say to anyone. It may be partly performed for views. Even if it is real, that is not a conversation we would want anyone starting next to our car. Say your piece if you must, keep your hands to yourself, and leave a stranger's family out of it. Disagree with the car. Do not put your hands on it.

SHE MADE THE PIZZA WORKER CRY, AND ANOTHER CUSTOMER STEPPED IN?? Was the customer right to confront her, or did jumping into somebody else's pizza order go too far? An older woman in a pizza shop is accused of making a young worker cry over an order that wasn't ready. Another customer gets in her face, and the staff end up refunding her and refusing to serve her. If someone really talked to a young worker like that over a late pizza, I understand why another adult stepped in. That is not how we would handle a late order, birthday or not. Paying for food does not buy you the right to make somebody's shift miserable. The crying part comes from text on the screen, not something we watch happen. What we do watch is the filmer unloading personal insults, and that is where she loses me a little. You can defend a worker without calling a stranger names about her age or her body. That turns a principle into a pile-on and gives the other side an easy way to change the subject. The shop made the clean decision: refund the money and decline the service. That is how a business protects its people without turning the lobby into a fight club. Defend the worker. Do not turn it into a personal roast.