On the frontier model front, it might be the case that there's no such thing as a general purpose model. For instance, I think the destiny for Anthropic might be to be the first true competitor to the Microsoft Office Suite in the last 20 years. I don't buy this idea that the labs will own the application layer broadly, but they could specialize and dominate one or two very valuable use cases. Given how quickly commoditization is happening at the model layer, this seems like the most likely outcome.

Bungie is reportedly planning major layoffs as the studio shifts focus following its transition under Sony, according to Bloomberg. At the same time, Destiny 3 is not currently in active development, and Bungie has no plans right now to fully greenlight another large-scale project for the existing Destiny 2 team. Employees are said to be pitching and prototyping different ideas, including projects set in the Destiny universe, but none have been approved for full production yet. Instead, Bungie resources are reportedly being redirected toward Marathon, the studio’s newly released extraction shooter.

I'm introducing an awesome website that could be of help to all the Destiny Child players. It's a database created by @mkrlexus. Go check it out❤️ #DestinyChild# #デスチャ# #데차#

According to reports from Jason Schreier, Bungie did not begin work on Destiny 3 immediately after The Final Shape launched because of the “enormous financial costs” associated with developing and supporting another full sequel. Bungie recently confirmed that it is ending active live-service development on Destiny 2 after one final major content update arrives on June 9, 2026. The game “will remain online and playable,” but the regular cycle of new seasons and expansions is coming to an end. “Destiny 3 is not in active production at this time.” Some staff members are reportedly shifting to other projects, including Marathon, while others are pitching new ideas, some of which could still be set in the Destiny universe. The studio is also reportedly preparing for “significant layoffs” as part of the transition.

"Tonight, as we stand on the edge of our 250th year of independence, I am thrilled to declare that AMERICA IS BACK... This is our heritage, this is our history, & this is the destiny of America: to be the greatest, most incredible country to ever grace the Earth." - POTUS

Change is easier to name after it already happened. What is harder is feeling it while it is still moving through daily life, before the old language has caught up to what is actually going on. That is where strength starts to matter. Not because someone decided it should, but because staying with change before it becomes obvious requires something real. Strength is being asked for in a time when the systems around life are still standing, but less and less able to carry what they were built to hold. They still shape daily life. They still hold influence. But they no longer truly serve the needs that created them. They remain anyway. A system can survive for decades while failing the exact needs that created it. That is the pressure underneath what is happening across the world right now. The arguments sound political on the surface, but the force driving them is more basic than ideology. Food. Sleep. Safety. The moment those three become unstable, the structure around them starts shaking too. The systems being used now were not created by accident. They solved real problems for a long time. They organized survival, distributed resources, created stability, and held societies together through periods where humanity still lived inside older limits. Humanity began pushing beyond those structures, and the same systems that once held life together started feeling like limits around it. The systems still speak the language of stability, but larger parts of life are experiencing them as limitation. Not because transcendence suddenly became a mass obsession. Not because the streets are filled with philosophers. Survival pressure reaches the body first. That is why the reactions happening across the world cannot be understood through slogans alone. What gets called populism is usually described as manipulation through ideas, as if large movements happen because a population suddenly gets captured by one philosophy. But underneath the language, the same pressure keeps returning. Something to eat. Somewhere to sleep. A sense of safety about tomorrow. Once those begin weakening, the emotional structure of society changes with them. That is the real force underneath the protests, the instability, the exhaustion, the anger. The argument on the surface is political. The mechanism underneath it is biological. The body reacts long before philosophy catches up. And that is why strength becomes one of the central questions of this period. Not strength as domination. Not strength as performance. Strength as the capacity to remain stable while old structures stop working the way they once did. Strength as the ability to face transition without collapsing into fear, ideology, or blind reaction. The deeper problem is not that humanity created systems. The deeper problem is that humanity is starting to outgrow them while still depending on them to survive. Philosophy becomes dangerous when it explains the world but never gives anyone a way to live. That is where the work has to become practical. Not practical in the shallow sense of turning every idea into a method, but practical in the sense that understanding has to touch action. It has to help life move without becoming another ideology. The point is not to force awareness onto everyone. That already becomes another form of pressure. It starts as consciousness, then becomes demand, then becomes the same old pattern wearing better language. The real task is not to make everyone speak the same language, walk the same path, or enter the same interior process. The real task is to build tools that return agency. That is where strength enters again. Strength is not something that arrives because the whole world finally understands the same thing. Strength has to be built. Made. Chosen into structure. It cannot wait for everyone else to walk the same road before it starts acting. That mistake happens easily when the path becomes personal. Once a certain kind of awareness starts opening, it is easy to imagine that the entire world must open in the same direction. But that assumption comes from being inside the path, not from seeing the whole. Music shows the mistake in a simple way. Some musicians treat one band as if it is the foundation of all real taste. If that band does not move someone, then the judgment comes fast. Maybe that listener does not understand music. Maybe there is no taste there. But that is absurd. Music can still be loved deeply without loving the thing someone else treats as essential. Consciousness work can fall into the same trap. The ones walking that road can start believing everyone else must wake up the same way for the world to change. But most of the world is not here to perform a consciousness process. Many are simply trying to live, eat, sleep, stay safe, and keep life from breaking. So the work cannot be to push everyone into awareness. The work is to translate philosophy into something usable without turning it into ideology. Ideology explains and gathers followers. Philosophy, when it becomes practical, should help create conditions where life can be ruled from within. An idea stays trapped inside philosophy until it can be touched. A board can be explained for hours. The surface, the ink, the chemistry behind why the marks disappear with water. All of that can be described intellectually. But the moment someone writes on the board, erases it with their own hand, and sees it happen directly, the relationship changes. The explanation arrives after contact. Movements can organize around ideas, symbols, language, identity, theory. Philosophy can also stay suspended above life if it never enters action. That is why philosophy cannot end in discussion. Words alone do not feed anyone, protect anyone, or give anyone a place to rest. The point of learning any of this is not to collect better concepts. The point is to turn understanding into action capable of addressing the three pressures that keep shaping human life underneath every ideology. Food. Safety. A place to sleep. Most of humanity is not waiting for a spiritual framework or a philosophical answer before the end of the month arrives. Most are trying to survive long enough to breathe. That is the ground every system eventually answers to whether it admits it or not. So the responsibility falls differently on the ones asking deeper questions. Not to force everyone into awareness. Not to hand out manuals telling everyone exactly what to do. The point is to awaken enough inner potential to build something real wherever that potential exists. Different places. Different projects. Different forms. But all rooted in the same movement from understanding into manifestation. History shows the same mechanism again and again. Revolutions are remembered through philosophers because philosophers later gave language to what happened. But the pressure underneath the movement usually began somewhere more immediate. Hunger moves faster than theory. The French Revolution did not begin because whole populations suddenly became intellectually devoted to republican philosophy. Bread disappeared. Survival pressure intensified. The body reached its limit first. Then philosophy entered the opening created by that pressure and helped shape a new structure afterward. That is the sequence history keeps revealing. Need arrives first. Theory comes later, once pressure has already opened a space where the old structure can no longer carry what life is asking from it. That is why awakening cannot remain internal only. Understanding has to become capable of building conditions where human beings can eat, rest, and feel safe again. Once those conditions stabilize, another kind of question finally becomes possible. Then philosophy stops being a luxury suspended above survival and becomes something life can actually reach toward. That brings the whole question back to strength. Because strength is still being imagined through the logic of conflict. Through resistance. Through opposition. Through the belief that change only happens when enough force gathers together against an enemy. That idea shaped civilizations for thousands of years. Entire societies were organized around territory, conquest, defense, survival through dominance. Unity became associated with war because survival depended on collective force. The stronger side won resources, protection, land, continuity. That logic stayed inside institutions long after the battles themselves changed form. It still shapes the imagination now. The phrase “unity creates strength” carries that older structure underneath it. A group gathers. An enemy appears. Pressure builds. Victory belongs to the strongest side. Even many movements trying to create change still unconsciously operate through that same architecture. But something stops working once reality begins changing faster than the structures built to contain it. Strength cannot continue meaning permanent combat against something outside. That model eventually traps everything inside reaction. Every movement needs an enemy to survive. Every identity needs opposition to hold itself together. Every system starts feeding on conflict because conflict becomes the source of coherence. Then the search for blame never ends. Another hidden group. Another controlling force. Another secret structure somewhere behind reality pulling the strings. The mind keeps looking for one thing to fight because the older idea of strength depends on having an opponent. But most of the systems shaping life now do not function through one hidden controller standing above everyone else. Power became structural long ago. Institutions, economies, governments, corporations, universities, media systems, political movements, cultural pressures. All of them interact and reinforce each other at different moments. There will always be individuals trying to gain influence or control, but reducing reality to one enemy keeps attention trapped in reaction when creation is the work being asked for. That is why blame cannot become the center of transformation. The moment all energy gets organized around fighting shadows, inner strength starts depending on the existence of an opponent. Then identity itself needs conflict in order to feel purpose. These times require another kind of strength. Not the strength of domination. Not the strength of the strongest male entering battle to conquer territory. Not the strength of permanent resistance. The old model can destroy structures, but it does not automatically know how to build new ones afterward. And that is the part becoming unavoidable now. No matter how much collapse, corruption, instability, or exhaustion becomes visible in the world, the real question remains the same. What can actually be built differently? What can sustain life differently? What can create food, rest, safety, and direction without reproducing the same structures again under new names? That work cannot come only from opposition. It has to come from inner stability strong enough to create without needing an enemy in order to move. The path turns inward before it turns outward, not as escape from the world, but because anything built externally without inner foundation eventually recreates the same patterns it tried to escape. That is where strength connects to power. Power outside and power inside are not the same movement. The older meaning of power was tied to mastery, ownership, authority over something beyond the self. To rule. To direct the destiny of others. That is still the structure behind political power, institutional power, governmental power. A population hands its will to someone else and trusts that structure to decide direction, protection, order, and future on its behalf. But that transfer happens more easily when inner strength is weak. The problem is not only that power concentrates outside. The deeper problem is that uncertainty inside makes external authority feel necessary. The less inner structure exists, the easier it becomes to search for someone else to hold direction together. That is why strength cannot mean aggression. Strength is construction. A structure becomes strong when all its parts hold together tightly enough that pressure cannot immediately break it apart. The image behind the word points toward solidity. Something difficult to move. A mountain. Stone bound by weight, pressure, and coherence. Yet real strength goes further than remaining unmoved. The same inner coherence that keeps a thing from breaking can also make action more precise and less scattered. It does not fight the mountain from every direction. It stands from one center long enough for what seemed fixed to begin shifting. This is why ancient civilizations built on elevated ground, surrounded by walls, towers, and fortresses. Not only for military defense. The fortress stood as a living image of stability. A place that held firm against chaos from the outside. A place from which danger could be seen in advance. A place where others could rest because something solid existed at the center. The same architecture exists inside a human being. Self knowledge starts building that fortress inside the being. The more disconnected someone becomes from inner history, inner structure, and inner understanding, the easier external forces begin shaping identity, decisions, reactions, and perception. That is why forgetting becomes dangerous. A human being disconnected from memory, history, and self understanding becomes easier to direct because nothing stable remains underneath the pressure. The center weakens. Then identity gets assembled externally through systems, trends, slogans, fears, distractions, and emotional reactions arriving from outside. Strength begins disappearing long before freedom disappears. And that is why education matters far beyond information alone. Knowledge by itself does not automatically create strength. Entire systems can produce enormous amounts of surface knowledge while avoiding the deeper process of helping someone know themselves. Facts can be memorized without ever constructing an inner foundation capable of standing on its own. But the moment self knowledge begins deepening, direction stops depending entirely on external authority. Inner power starts appearing because awareness begins organizing the structure from within instead of waiting for identity to be handed over from outside. That is the real meaning behind this movement toward strength. Not collective aggression against an enemy. Not building another ideology. Not replacing one ruler with another ruler. Real strength appears when the being becomes stable enough internally that power no longer has to be surrendered outward in exchange for direction. Ignorance hands power away. Self knowledge takes it back.

I didn’t expect an article this long to reach millions in today’s 3-second attention span economy. I’ve read every single quote and comment. To be honest, I’m overwhelmed. I’ve never felt this much warmth on this platform. And I’m just deeply, sincerely grateful. Thank you, truly. I’m not much different from anyone else who just entered this space. The only real difference is that I’ve bled more. I’ve lost more. As a Christian, my faith gave me this habit of constant reflection, and forced me to look in the mirror and face the rot inside me. It gave me a way out when I was drowning, and eventually, that became my redemption. Crypto was meant to be about anarchy. It was meant to be the middle finger to the gatekeepers in suits who think they’re better than us. That spirit feels dead lately, but I still believe in it. I have to. This space changed my life, and I’ll keep building here until the wheels fall off. But I’m not going to pretend I had some perfect journey. In my early years, I got absolutely fucked by Ponzis. I couldn't control my greed and lost most of my early Bitcoin (thank you, MMM). I was just a naive kid. Every time I think about this part, I want to apologize to my mom. She had zero clue what I was actually doing. I was literally sneaking out every other night to act as a middleman in Vancouver’s nightlife. I was sourcing and flipping Moutai, whiskey, and expensive cigarettes to rich Chinese university students. I was the one brokering the VIP tables and getting people through the door. Honestly, I was just really good at getting rich kids to come to parties. I know people look down on that kind of "job." It isn't something people proudly say like "I worked at Google." But I’m proud of it. I was literally making an entry-level Google salary as a teenager just by being a better hustler than the adults. Without that hustle, I wouldn't have anything I have today. That revenue stream was the only reason I could keep buying back into Bitcoin. I was sitting on a level of wealth I had to hide from my parents for years. No parent in their right mind would let an underage kid handle that amount of wealth. I’ve never known what it’s like to get rich quick overnight. For me, it was always a long, grueling season. The closest I ever came to “getting rich overnight” was thanks to Cryptokitties. Watching my kitties flip every day for weeks while ETH was mooning... that was the first time I actually felt like I’d made it. But the scariest thing is when God gives you a "trial card" to see a world you aren’t ready for, only to snatch it back and throw you to the bottom. In late 2018, when prices had dumped to a devastating low (again...), I had to go right back to the middleman business to get more bullets. But that time, I was different. My faith had shifted my perspective. I wasn't just chasing a high anymore. I knew, with everything in me, that crypto was the destiny I was meant to build. If you're at your lowest right now, don't let the ego stop you. I've been in those dark times too. Nothing is "too tacky" when you are grinding to fund your vision. Whether you're hauling inventory, flipping goods, or doing the gritty backend work no one else wants to touch - do what you need to do. Tell those who try to shame you to fuck off. Because when you finally make it one day, they will all come back to you acting like they were your biggest fans from the start. The people judging you from the sidelines aren't the ones who are going to change your life. You are. Keep building. I'm right here with you.

Destiny 2’s live service ends with the final update Monument of Triumph on June 9, 2026. >All future expansions and content drops are canceled. >The game will remain fully playable like the original Destiny >The last update adding permanent features including Pantheon 2.0 Bungie is shifting focus to new projects like Marathon while leaving D2 as a finished celebration.

Bungie has shared an update on the future of Destiny and Marathon and knows it has much work to do to win players back. The plan includes returning vaulted Destiny 2 content such as old campaigns, destinations, and raids. This will not happen overnight, as the content needs technical updates first. Destiny remains a major part of its plans, with the October Nightfall Refresh and December Symbiosis update incoming. Bungie wants to expand Marathon beyond its original extraction-shooter formula with more modes, including PvE, PvP, and PvPvE. The studio understands player frustration and must prove change through the games themselves. “We are not done with Destiny.”

The voice director for Marathon, Elias Toufexis, spoke out about the backlash from Destiny 2 fans. Many players are upset that Bungie is shifting resources away from Destiny 2 to focus on Marathon He understands the frustration and noted that fans really loved the game before Bungie put it “on hold” to work on Marathon. Toufexis says it’s totally fine to criticize the game or his work, saying “Critique the game? Critique my work? Totally acceptable.” But he questions why some people are actively rooting for Marathon to fail. Instead, he tells unhappy fans to simply “speak with your wallet” and not buy the game. Done.