arXiv has many faulty proofs, according to Astra and Opus 5.5. I'm running actual audits to make sure the claimed solutions don't affect the status of the open problems on my list (
Looking for an ArXiv endorser in Computational Linguistics ( for a new paper submission. I’m a postdoc at HEC, and this is my first ArXiv submission. I would greatly appreciate any help or connections. Please DM me if you can assist. Thank you!
A carefully controlled look at looped transformers (arXiv 2609.19107):
1. Weight sharing is not compute-optimal on fresh data. It costs a constant ~1.06–1.16x compute at every scale.
2. The looped model's gains over vanilla come from elsewhere: the norm + input re-injection boundary operator, and growing depth mid-training. Both improve the scaling exponent. Neither needs weight sharing.
3. Looping is still a parameter-free way to get growth. Tied growth keeps the exponent gain at vanilla param count.
4. Weight sharing wins on multi-epoch, data-constrained training.