@WY_traditional @zuiaiyiyi 因为女性天生地认为自己是弱小的，她们必须认为当权者应该给女性提供更多的权利，多看看新闻就知道了，同样的事情女性维权和男性维权的官方结果完全不一样，男人不是不会维权但是官方没有实际处理和回应也是白费，而女性总是觉得自己的性别比男性更重要，这实际上就是女权主义在社会中的实际体现啊

来了来了——基于 Zama FHE 协议的 首个自托管银行 要来了。 @raycashxyz 团队把“链上隐私”和“传统支付体验”整合到一起，自托管银行由此诞生了。 不同于传统银行，自托管银行的余额和交易在链上是 完全加密 的，既能计算、能验证，又不需要信托机构代持。 换句话说： 你的钱不进别人手里 协议（@zama）也看不到你的账户余额 但系统依然能正常工作 他们的目标非常务实： 链上： 资产是你的，别人动不了 链下： 仍然能用借记卡、IBAN 做支付、兑换、质押 安全与隐私由协议保证，而不是靠人品或机构背书。 如果真能做成，体验会非常接近一个功能完善的银行账户—— 但资产 完全在你自己的钱包里，没人能冻你、卡你、动你、替你保管。 整体感觉这不是在“发明新银行概念”， 而是把加密世界该有的底层安全性 和现实世界金融该有的可用性 真正整合成一个 终于能落地的东西。 @zama #ZamaCreatorProgram# Here it comes — the first self-custodial bank built on Zama’s FHE protocol is on the horizon. The @raycashxyz team is combining on-chain confidentiality with the traditional payment experience, and that’s what makes a true self-custodial banking model possible. Unlike traditional banks, balances and transactions are fully encrypted on-chain. They can still be computed, validated, and processed — without any trusted custodian. In other words: Your money never sits in someone else’s hands Even @zama can’t see your balance Yet the system runs smoothly Their goals are impressively practical: On-chain: your assets are yours — no one can touch them Off-chain: you can still use debit cards, IBAN, payments, swaps, staking Security and privacy come from the protocol itself, not from human trust. If they succeed, the experience will feel like a fully functional bank account — except all assets stay entirely in your own wallet, immune to freezes, holds, or custodial risk. This doesn’t feel like “inventing a new type of bank.” It feels like merging crypto-level security with real-world financial usability into something that can finally be deployed. @zama #ZamaCreatorProgram#