#为什么是中国# #WhyChina# The Global Logic of China's Economic Growth in the First Half of 2026: A 4.7% GDP Increase 2026年上半年GDP增长4.7%：中国经济增长的全球逻辑 According to the latest semi-annual report, China's gross domestic product (GDP) reached 69.6 trillion yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 4.7% at constant prices, in line with the annual growth target. Against a backdrop of intertwined international complexities and volatilities, China's economic performance is commendable. Yet, a closer look at the data reveals that the logic underpinning China's economic growth is being reshaped. (I) At the Industry Level, Notable Highlights Emerge: First, new quality productive forces are being cultivated and strengthened at an accelerated pace.** In the first half of the year, industrial production grew robustly. The value-added output of the equipment manufacturing sector increased by 9.3% year-on-year, and that of high-tech manufacturing grew by 13.3%, both outpacing the overall growth rate of industrial output above a designated scale. This underscores a clear trend toward a high-end, intelligent, green, and integrated industrial structure. Looking at specific products, the output of 3D printing equipment, lithium-ion batteries, industrial robots, and other products emblematic of new quality productive forces surged. The average daily token call volume has reached hundreds of trillions, showcasing the vitality and potential of the digital and intelligent economies. Second, new growth drivers are accelerating to take on a leading role. Preliminary estimates suggest that new growth drivers—encompassing high-end manufacturing, the digital economy, and modern services—contributed over 40% to economic growth in the first half of the year. The economy's distinct shift toward a higher quality and more optimized structure is evident, and this overall trend is accelerating. For instance, industries related to artificial intelligence, such as integrated circuit manufacturing and intelligent vehicle equipment manufacturing, have all maintained high growth rates exceeding 30%, vividly illustrating the pace of China's industrial upgrading. Third, confidence on the investment front is on the rise. In the first half of the year, investment in high-tech industries grew by 4.6% year-on-year. Notably, investment in the manufacturing of aircraft, spacecraft, and equipment, computer and office equipment manufacturing, and information services grew by 23.3%, 8.1%, and 15.5%, respectively. Investment structure best reflects market expectations. The increasing "new economy content" in investments signals an acceleration in the replacement of old growth drivers with new ones. Investment in intellectual property products grew by 9.4%, indicating that enterprises are placing greater emphasis on R&D and innovation. This suggests that technological advancement is not simply about capacity expansion but about qualitative change driven by innovation. (II) Observing a Major Economy Requires Looking Beyond the Immediate Figures to the Long-term Trajectory. Behind the "new economy content" of the semi-annual report lies China's ongoing transformation from a global manufacturing hub to a global center of innovation. At the 17th Annual Meeting of the New Champions (Summer Davos), observers noted a new phenomenon: a host of unicorn companies are heading to China. They are establishing R&D centers, regional headquarters, and deeply integrating into China's innovation and industrial chains—shifting from "produced in China" to "created in China." So, why China? Economist Justin Yifu Lin, in his book *Demystifying the Chinese Economy, touched upon the theory of the "speed of technological change." He argues that the essence of the industrial revolution is not just the application of new technologies, but more fundamentally, the ever-accelerating pace of technological change. Since the mid-18th century, starting with the steam engine reshaping the textile industry, the snowball of technological change has grown, rapidly sweeping through industries like chemicals and automobiles, ultimately redrawing the geographical map of great power competition. Looking at China today, the trajectory of accelerating technological change is equally clear. A leading enterprise can drive an entire industry, which in turn can boost a whole region. These burgeoning industrial clusters, growing from saplings to forests, not only enhance production efficiency and invigorate market vitality but also effectively improve development quality and resilience. For example, specialized and sophisticated "little giant" enterprises above a designated scale in Beijing, through deep cultivation of innovation chains, supply chain collaboration, and international expansion, have become "connecting points" and "accelerators" for the dual circulation strategy. More importantly, emerging industrial clusters possess powerful spillover effects. The rapid rise of new energy vehicles is not only reshaping the automotive industry but also driving transformations in chips, software, and energy networks, allowing more sectors to gain value from efficiency improvements. The swift advancements in AI and biomedicine are sparking a "gentle qualitative change" in people's livelihoods, significantly enhancing the sense of fulfillment and well-being through smarter, more affordable products and more livable environments. (III) Looking from the First Half to the Full Year, China's Development Momentum Remains Positive. Of course, during this critical period of transitioning between old and new growth drivers, China's economy still faces lingering issues and new challenges. Some core areas are still grappling with "bottleneck" technologies, certain high-tech industries face external risks of "decoupling" and supply chain disruptions, and "involution"-style competition affects the new energy market ecosystem. However, most of these are issues arising from development and transition, and they can be addressed with effort. The supporting conditions and fundamental trends for long-term economic improvement remain unchanged. China's economic journey toward a newer, higher-quality model is itself a process of encountering new problems and solving them along the way. By maintaining confidence, proceeding steadily, and balancing both qualitative improvements and quantitative growth, China's industries are poised to be brimming with dynamism, and the Chinese economy will continue to advance steadily and sustainably. #China# #Jiangxi# #JiangxiEconomy# #世界经济看中国# #赣出新精彩#

吴说获悉，Avalanche 宣布，RWA 平台 Midas 已将 mWIN 和 mGLOBAL 两款代币化投资产品引入 Avalanche，分别提供 Wellington Management 管理的机构固定收益策略及 Fasanara Capital 管理的另类信贷策略。两款产品可在链上实现可编程、可转让，并用于相关金融应用。mWIN 主要关联多元固定收益投资组合，mGLOBAL 则关联应收账款及资产支持信贷策略。

吴说获悉，Midas 在 Aave 治理论坛提交 ARFC，提议将 mWIN 作为抵押品纳入 Aave Horizon。mWIN 由 Midas 发行、Wellington Management 管理，是代币化多部门主动管理固定收益投资组合，已在以太坊主网上线。提案称，mWIN 面向白名单机构及合格投资者，底层资产包括 CLO、CMBS、RMBS、ABS 及投资级公司债等；LlamaRisk 正进行独立风险审查，风险参数将在 Snapshot 投票前公布。

高盛已撤回此前“美联储下周维持利率不变”的预测，转而预计将加息 25 个基点。高盛表示，最新 CPI 并未实质改变其通胀判断，但在市场已计入近 90% 加息概率的情况下，美联储可能希望避免按兵不动引发剧烈市场反应。Wellington-Altus 首席市场策略师 James Thorne 认为，当前加息更多是在迎合华尔街预期，而非应对通胀；KPMG 首席经济学家 Diane Swonk 则认为服务业通胀仍偏热，并预计到 2027 年初可能累计加息三次。（CoinDesk）

财政部开始抢美联储的“利率方向盘”，沃什的政策逻辑被打乱 财政部扩大长债回购，短期成功压低收益率，却可能给美联储制造新麻烦。如果通胀不降反升，沃什甚至可能需要通过加息来抵消财政部带来的宽松效果。 美国财政部扩大长期美债回购规模后，长端收益率迅速回落，但市场关注的已不只是债市本身。随着财政部主动压低长期融资成本，美联储主席沃什此前依赖市场利率收紧金融环境的政策逻辑，正面临新的掣肘。 8月19日，美国财政部宣布将10年至30年期美债回购规模至少扩大一倍，每次操作规模由此前最高20亿美元提高至至少40亿美元，计划于9月9日至11月4日实施。 消息公布后，美债收益率明显回落。此前，30年期美债收益率一度升至19年来高位，通胀仍高于美联储2%的目标，同时财政赤字、政府融资需求，以及科技企业为AI基础设施融资带来的债券发行，都在推高长期融资成本。 TradeStation全球市场策略主管David Russell认为，随着沃什减少政策指引、财政部长贝森特主动干预长端市场，“市场的重心可能正在从美联储转向财政部”。他表示，如果这一趋势持续，对交易员而言将是重大变化。 但财政部的工具与美联储并不相同。Wellington固定收益投资组合经理Brij Khurana指出，美联储能够创造货币购买资产，而财政部并没有这一能力，回购资金仍需要通过发行短期国债等方式筹集，因此这一操作并不等同于量化宽松。 长端利率下行，反而增加沃什的政策难题 财政部此次行动之所以牵动美联储，在于沃什此前已经释放出一个重要信号：较高的长期收益率本身就在帮助美联储收紧金融条件。 7月29日的新闻发布会上，沃什多次提及长期债券收益率明显上升。此前市场形成的逻辑是，即使美联储不提高联邦基金利率，债券市场也能通过推高长端收益率，提高企业和居民融资成本，从而替美联储完成部分紧缩工作。 Wilmington Trust高级债券投资组合经理Wil Stith认为，财政部扩大回购让沃什“处于非常不舒服的位置”。他表示，原本是长端债市在替美联储发挥作用，如今财政部却在“把这种作用往回推”。 Stith进一步指出，美联储的行动最终将取决于通胀走势。如果通胀保持不变甚至继续上升，财政部压低长期收益率带来的宽松效果，可能迫使美联储更加积极地加息。“美联储和财政部基本上是在朝相反方向行动”，而美联储拥有更大的政策工具箱，因此可能需要通过调整联邦基金利率抵消财政部的影响。 RSM首席经济学家Joe Brusuelas也认为，财政部压低长端收益率会让沃什实现2%通胀目标更加困难。沃什倾向于让利率由市场自然定价，而此前债券市场正通过要求更高收益率来反映通胀和财政风险。 Brusuelas警告，如果财政政策与货币政策长期朝不同方向发展，最终可能导致严重的政策失误。 沃什下周将在杰克逊霍尔全球央行年会上发表演讲。Stith认为，财政部突然扩大回购规模后，沃什可能不得不重新考虑演讲内容，“他原本可能想着重于减缓通胀，而不提供前瞻性指引。但财政部的举措是否要求他采取更强硬的立场，或者在某种程度上改变他不提供前瞻性指引的政策呢？” 回购能缓解压力，却难改长期趋势 另一方面，目前市场并未普遍认为美联储需要跟进购买国债。美联储的资产购买计划或许能够降低收益率或限制其上涨，而且与财政部相比，它拥有更强大的政策火力。但这相当于放松货币政策，而这与美联储持续努力降低通胀的目标难以协调。 实际上，沃什一直希望美联储减少债券持有量，但表示由于问题复杂，实现这一目标需要时间。美联储持有的债券规模对沃什而言很重要，因为他认为美联储持有太多债券，而这些持仓扭曲了金融市场的定价。 TD Securities美国利率策略主管Gennadiy Goldberg表示，美联储介入稳定市场的门槛“目前非常高”，除非流动性严重恶化、出现明显市场失灵，而目前并没有这种情况。 财政部压低长端利率的操作被广泛视为一种‌“治标不治本”‌的流动性管理手段。PGIM首席全球经济学家Daleep Singh认为，财政部的措施没有改变推动长期收益率上涨的基本因素，只是让这一问题更加受到关注，而且是在“没有可信的策略解决”根本矛盾的情况下采取行动。 Evercore ISI央行策略主管Krishna Guha同样认为，回购的即时效果明显，但很难长期压低收益率。该操作可以吸引此前因收益率上涨而观望的买家，也可能迫使部分空头短期平仓，但难以扭转长期趋势。 Brusuelas认为，若要持续压低长期收益率，最终仍需要削减政府支出，但在当前两党均倾向于民粹式经济政策的环境下，这并不现实。他称，财政部的措施更像是对财政问题的“临时缓解”，而非真正解决方案。