#为什么是中国# #WhyChina# The Global Logic of China's Economic Growth in the First Half of 2026: A 4.7% GDP Increase 2026年上半年GDP增长4.7%：中国经济增长的全球逻辑 According to the latest semi-annual report, China's gross domestic product (GDP) reached 69.6 trillion yuan, representing a year-on-year increase of 4.7% at constant prices, in line with the annual growth target. Against a backdrop of intertwined international complexities and volatilities, China's economic performance is commendable. Yet, a closer look at the data reveals that the logic underpinning China's economic growth is being reshaped. (I) At the Industry Level, Notable Highlights Emerge: First, new quality productive forces are being cultivated and strengthened at an accelerated pace.** In the first half of the year, industrial production grew robustly. The value-added output of the equipment manufacturing sector increased by 9.3% year-on-year, and that of high-tech manufacturing grew by 13.3%, both outpacing the overall growth rate of industrial output above a designated scale. This underscores a clear trend toward a high-end, intelligent, green, and integrated industrial structure. Looking at specific products, the output of 3D printing equipment, lithium-ion batteries, industrial robots, and other products emblematic of new quality productive forces surged. The average daily token call volume has reached hundreds of trillions, showcasing the vitality and potential of the digital and intelligent economies. Second, new growth drivers are accelerating to take on a leading role. Preliminary estimates suggest that new growth drivers—encompassing high-end manufacturing, the digital economy, and modern services—contributed over 40% to economic growth in the first half of the year. The economy's distinct shift toward a higher quality and more optimized structure is evident, and this overall trend is accelerating. For instance, industries related to artificial intelligence, such as integrated circuit manufacturing and intelligent vehicle equipment manufacturing, have all maintained high growth rates exceeding 30%, vividly illustrating the pace of China's industrial upgrading. Third, confidence on the investment front is on the rise. In the first half of the year, investment in high-tech industries grew by 4.6% year-on-year. Notably, investment in the manufacturing of aircraft, spacecraft, and equipment, computer and office equipment manufacturing, and information services grew by 23.3%, 8.1%, and 15.5%, respectively. Investment structure best reflects market expectations. The increasing "new economy content" in investments signals an acceleration in the replacement of old growth drivers with new ones. Investment in intellectual property products grew by 9.4%, indicating that enterprises are placing greater emphasis on R&D and innovation. This suggests that technological advancement is not simply about capacity expansion but about qualitative change driven by innovation. (II) Observing a Major Economy Requires Looking Beyond the Immediate Figures to the Long-term Trajectory. Behind the "new economy content" of the semi-annual report lies China's ongoing transformation from a global manufacturing hub to a global center of innovation. At the 17th Annual Meeting of the New Champions (Summer Davos), observers noted a new phenomenon: a host of unicorn companies are heading to China. They are establishing R&D centers, regional headquarters, and deeply integrating into China's innovation and industrial chains—shifting from "produced in China" to "created in China." So, why China? Economist Justin Yifu Lin, in his book *Demystifying the Chinese Economy, touched upon the theory of the "speed of technological change." He argues that the essence of the industrial revolution is not just the application of new technologies, but more fundamentally, the ever-accelerating pace of technological change. Since the mid-18th century, starting with the steam engine reshaping the textile industry, the snowball of technological change has grown, rapidly sweeping through industries like chemicals and automobiles, ultimately redrawing the geographical map of great power competition. Looking at China today, the trajectory of accelerating technological change is equally clear. A leading enterprise can drive an entire industry, which in turn can boost a whole region. These burgeoning industrial clusters, growing from saplings to forests, not only enhance production efficiency and invigorate market vitality but also effectively improve development quality and resilience. For example, specialized and sophisticated "little giant" enterprises above a designated scale in Beijing, through deep cultivation of innovation chains, supply chain collaboration, and international expansion, have become "connecting points" and "accelerators" for the dual circulation strategy. More importantly, emerging industrial clusters possess powerful spillover effects. The rapid rise of new energy vehicles is not only reshaping the automotive industry but also driving transformations in chips, software, and energy networks, allowing more sectors to gain value from efficiency improvements. The swift advancements in AI and biomedicine are sparking a "gentle qualitative change" in people's livelihoods, significantly enhancing the sense of fulfillment and well-being through smarter, more affordable products and more livable environments. (III) Looking from the First Half to the Full Year, China's Development Momentum Remains Positive. Of course, during this critical period of transitioning between old and new growth drivers, China's economy still faces lingering issues and new challenges. Some core areas are still grappling with "bottleneck" technologies, certain high-tech industries face external risks of "decoupling" and supply chain disruptions, and "involution"-style competition affects the new energy market ecosystem. However, most of these are issues arising from development and transition, and they can be addressed with effort. The supporting conditions and fundamental trends for long-term economic improvement remain unchanged. China's economic journey toward a newer, higher-quality model is itself a process of encountering new problems and solving them along the way. By maintaining confidence, proceeding steadily, and balancing both qualitative improvements and quantitative growth, China's industries are poised to be brimming with dynamism, and the Chinese economy will continue to advance steadily and sustainably. #China# #Jiangxi# #JiangxiEconomy# #世界经济看中国# #赣出新精彩#

“老師，即便是我，也有無法用邏輯抑制的渴望...” ——『碧藍檔案-調月莉音』 "Teacher, even I have desires that cannot be suppressed by logic" ——『Blue Archive-Tsukatsuki Rio』

🧵 后端/基建开发推荐阅读的十篇论文 别只背八股了，很多面试题就是这些论文里的工程问题被压缩成的问答。 推荐按顺序读，强烈建议边读边画图/做笔记。 1️⃣ RocksDB： 看懂工业级 KV 存储怎么演进 RocksDB 这篇不是讲单个算法，而是讲一个 KV 存储在大规模生产环境里，优化重点怎么从写放大、空间放大一路转到 CPU 利用率。 Evolution of Development Priorities in Key-value Stores Serving Large-scale Applications: The RocksDB Experience 2️⃣ WiscKey： 理解为什么要把 key 和 value 拆开WiscKey 的核心是把 LSM-tree 里的 key 和 value 分离，减少 I/O 放大，尤其适合理解 SSD 时代 KV 存储的设计取舍。 WiscKey: Separating Keys from Values in SSD-conscious Storage 3️⃣ Vertical Paxos： 把主从同步放进共识算法里看很多高可用方案看起来只是“注册中心 + 主从同步”，但 Vertical Paxos 提供了更底层的解释框架。 Vertical Paxos and Primary-Backup Replication 4️⃣ PacificA： 工程里的强一致复制协议PacificA 讲的是日志型分布式存储系统里的复制框架，重点不是抽象共识理论，而是故障、恢复、对账这些工程细节。 PacificA: Replication in Log-Based Distributed Storage Systems 5️⃣ SWIM： 服务发现别只会说注册中心SWIM 把故障检测和成员变更传播拆开，用随机探测 + gossip 传播，解决大规模节点下全量心跳扛不住的问题。 SWIM: Scalable Weakly-consistent Infection-style Process Group Membership Protocol 6️⃣ TiDB： Raft 怎么落到 HTAP 数据库里TiDB 这篇讲 multi-Raft、行存、列存副本和 learner，适合看 Raft 怎么服务事务和分析混合负载。 TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database 7️⃣ Paxos vs Raft： 别把二者理解成口水战这篇用相同术语比较 Paxos 和 Raft，结论很实用： 二者整体方法接近，核心差异主要在 leader election。 Paxos vs Raft: Have we reached consensus on distributed consensus? 8️⃣ Paxos 和 Raft 的形式化映射： 把学术优化搬到工程系统上海交大这篇建立了 Paxos 和 Raft 的形式化对应关系，还讨论如何把 Paxos 优化迁移到 Raft。 On the parallels between Paxos and Raft, and how to port optimizations 9️⃣ PolarFS： 高性能共享存储里的 ParallelRaftPolarFS 为 PolarDB 做低延迟共享存储，里面提出 ParallelRaft，用乱序 I/O 能力突破 Raft 严格串行带来的吞吐限制。 PolarFS: An Ultra-low Latency and Failure Resilient Distributed File System for Shared Storage Cloud Database 🔟 X-Engine： 双 11 级 OLTP 存储引擎X-Engine 是阿里的 OLTP 存储引擎方向，适合看电商峰值流量下，存储层怎么做写入、压缩、缓存和冷热数据管理。 X-Engine: An Optimized Storage Engine for Large-scale E-commerce Transaction Processing

Over the past two weeks, our team XDO has been working closely with @worldlibertyfi — and honestly, it’s been a real surprise for me. 最近两周，我们团队XDO开始和 @worldlibertyfi 密切合作，狠狠的教育了我！ Tbh, I had my own stereotypes at the beginning. Trump-backing, access to top-tier global resources — I assumed the team would be the type like: big vision, endless resources, everyone coming to them instead of the other way around. I mean, you can easily afford to be a “laid-back” team with this level of privilege and prestige.😂 说实话，刚开始接触的时候我是有刻板印象的。总统家族背景，全球顶流资源，我assume团体风格会是：愿景很大、资源很多，一定是所有的资源去找他们。可以猜想这种有顶级资源的美国团队有多么躺。 But after two weeks of working with them, I was genuinely impressed — even humbled. 但接触下来非常惊喜，甚至教育到我。 On nye, co-founder @ZachWitkoff was still handling interviews job. By Jan 2nd — when most people were still in holiday mode — their entire team was fully back in action. Every sync was well-prepared, execution was fast, and nothing was half-hearted. Even though many team members didn’t come from a Web3 background, everyone was actively and intensely learning. In every discussion, they consistently identified the single most critical key to success, made fast decisions, and mobilized the entire team to execute. From @ZachWitkoff & @zakfolkman founding-team-level market strategy decisions to execution, implementation, and even contract reviews — all of that can happen within a single day. 新年当天，Co-founder @ZachWitkoff 还在处理这面试的工作。1月2号，当大多数人还在休假模式的时候，他们已经全员到岗火力全开了。每次对接，准备充分，执行迅速，一点不含糊。虽然，很多人之前没有Web3背景，但是每个人在饥渴的学习Web3的知识。并且每次探讨中，总是可以找到决定事情成功的最核心的KEY，然后快速决策并全团队响应执行。是的，从大市场战略的Founding team决策到对其执行到落地执行包括审核合同，一天足以。 This made me reflect: why is a team with such a background working even harder than many startup founders? 这让我开始反思：为什么有这种背景的团队，反而比很多一般的创业者还拼？ My guess? Because the whole world is watching. If a normal project fails, you pivot and start over. But WLFI is different — with this kind of background, success is expected. That expectation pushes the founding team to focus on how to succeed even more. That pressure forces them to put in 200% effort to prove that what they build goes far beyond what their so-called “background” could ever hand them. 我猜的——因为全世界都在看。普通项目失败了，换个赛道重来就是。但 WLFI 不一样，顶着这种背景，成功变成了是应该的。所以，整个创始团队更聚焦在如何可以更加成功！这种压力，逼着他们必须用 200% 的努力去证明自己可以做的事情要远远超过他们“所谓的背景”可以给予的。 Another detail I noticed: their execution logic is extremely clear. It’s not the “we have resources, let’s just throw money at it” mindset. They are deliberately building long-term value step by step. They value every partner and every dollar — while also knowing how to turn those into weapons for rapid market capture. And when it comes to critical decisions, they don’t hesitate to invest heavily. You can imagine what this combination can ultimately become: top-tier resources + top-tier execution + a massive market = Massive future for @worldlibertyfi $USD1 By the way, this also validates a thesis I shared in my previous article (link below): in 2025, stablecoins are increasingly becoming the bridge to mainstream assets. Sustainability at the business level matters — and this is exactly the direction we’ve been betting on. 而且我观察到一个细节：他们团队做事的逻辑非常清晰，不是那种「有资源就随便造」的心态，而是真的在一步步构建长期价值。珍惜每一个合作伙伴，珍惜每一分钱，但是同时这些也可以成为快速抢占市场的武器。对于关键事情上，丝毫不吝惜。我们可以想象这种组合——顶级资源 + 顶级执行力 + 超级大的市场 WLFI USD1可以成为什么样最终形态。顺便说一句，也验证了我在之前一篇长文里的思考，今年稳定币成为连接主流资产的趋势越来越明显了。业务本身的可持续性。这也是我们一直在押注的方向。 So YEP! My view on WLFI has completely changed. This is a team that genuinely takes execution seriously, and have the power to make all dreams come true. 所以我现在对 WLFI 的看法彻底改变了。至少从合作体验来说，这是一个认真做事并且有实现造梦能力的团队。 If people with backgrounds are working this hard, what excuse do those without one have to be laid-back?? 「Don't make excuses for not being where you want to be. It usually comes down to not trying hard enough, or focusing on the wrong things.」 「Jiayi never used to create anxiety. But from now on, anxiety and self-reflection start with Jiayi.」 有背景的人都在拼命，没背景的凭什么躺平？ 「不要给自己的不够优秀找借口。大多数就是自己不够努力，或者努力方向不对！」 「Jiayi之前不制造焦虑。但是从现在开始，焦虑和反思从Jiayi开始。」 Side note: after deeply engaging with the founding team, I started allocating heavily into $ALTS (already 100% in profit so far) and $WLFI. I’m happy to say that so far, the results have been very encouraging. 题外话： 正式因为深度的接触了创始团队后。我开始重仓WLFI的DAT股票 $ALTS (且翻倍了）和 $WLFI。很开心，目前为止，让我看到了好的结果。 LONG Crypto 🚀 LONG Stablecoin 🚀 LONG Myself

非财务建议-纯抽象闲聊 Ticker 起名哲学。 $WLFI 这个 ticker 起得非常不好，它有三个大问题：（1）缺乏元音（2）有易混淆字母；（3）难以联想。 1.缺乏元音，无法拼出。 目前 $WLFI 老外一般称之为 W-L-F-L，或者硬着头皮喊全名 World Liberty Financial，甚至还有不少人记错最后一个单词为 Finance。 这和 Trump 或者 DeFi 这种元音辅音俱全的单词，相差甚远可以说是天壤之别。 老中则只能更无奈称之为 达不溜-艾鲁-艾弗-艾。 这个很关键，因为名字不够响亮，大家就会倾向于更少地提及全称，而是用它、它们、内个，川普儿子币来代指，降低曝光。 2.同时出现易混淆字母 L 和 I 考虑大小写后，会有 L l I i 四个易混淆字母。这几个字母同时出现很糟糕，这会让人们，尤其是非英语国家更难记住它，也增加传播难度。 甚至有博主认为这个币叫 WLFL 和 WIFI，醉了。 3.无法单词联想，容易忘记 尽管有一些英文社区称 $WLFI 之为 whale-fi，但这个目前看起来没形成共识。 我说几个比较好的 Ticker，例如狗狗、企鹅、Uni 会让明确地联想到某种具体物品，而反观 WLFI 就很难。 而且产品 USD1 和 WLFL 没有任何联想记忆，所以哪怕叫 WLF1 都好过 WLFL。 ---分割线--- 说实话，我要是 达不溜-艾鲁-艾弗-艾 的顾问，我会建议它使用“Eagle（老鹰）”来当代币 ticker，符合老美传统形象和它的品牌 Logo，小学生都认识的单词还朗朗上口。 可惜换不得。 我的长期观点：好的 Ticker 是项目成功的一半。 最后重申：非财务建议，未加入多空大战，纯聊 Ticker 起名哲学。

I’ve heard that longing, like the wind, can reach anywhere. I hope the wind rises, yet you seem to wish it would cease. Alas, longing makes no sound; fortunately, longing makes no sound. Look, the wind is blowing again. 听闻思念如风，可以抵达任何地方。 我盼风起，你却盼风止。 奈何思念无声，幸好思念无声。 你看，又起风了。

I just reserved my Cloudflare Wallet tag: Reserve yours now at Cloudflare推出Cloudflare Wallets， 目前仅开放用户名预留，完整功能未来几个月上线。