🐝 PANINI二创活动同步开启，现在轮到你来定义这只勤劳的小蜜蜂 💰奖励设置： 一等奖 ：888元 * 1名 优秀奖：88元* 5名 参与方式（必读）： 1. 围绕 PANINI 进行二创，表情包、插画、Meme、GIF、短视频、周边概念都可以。 2. 引用本条推文，展示你的作品，并带上 #PANews8周年# #PANINI二创# 话题 3. 填写表单，提交作品推文链接。 官方将综合创意、完成度、PANINI 契合度和作品推文热度等纬度评选获奖作品。 🔗表单链接： 📅截止日期：5月26日

🎮 Web3 Gaming Weekly 周刊 · 重点事件前瞻 📅 07.31 - 08.06 🟥 07/31 | YGG Play @YGG_Play 平台关闭：平台支持进入最后一天，主站、Launchpad 与社区任务页随后关闭；这项累计收入超 900 万美元的发行实验终止，GIGACHADBAT、Ragnarok Breaker 转回原工作室维护。 🟥 07/31 | The Seven Deadly Sins @7DS_en Deadly Sins 免费 Mint 开启：Immutable 与 MARBLEX 推出的第二季免费 Mint 已开放；玩家完成约三分钟任务即可铸造角色 NFT，并可升级为稀有的 Demon Meliodas，最高对应 900 MBX 奖励。 🟥 07/31 | Moonbirds @moonbirds 联名 Panini 开启 Birbs Beyond 发售：Moonbirds 官宣与全球最大的体育和娱乐收藏品公司 Panini 达成重磅合作。双方联名的 Birbs Beyond 系列销售活动将于北京时间 00:00 在 Panini America Blockchain 平台上准时开启。 🟥 08/03 | Heroes of Mavia @MaviaGame Alliance Wars Season 1（Base）：北京时间 16:00 启动首个联盟战争赛季，正式引入八人联盟攻防、区域分配与赛季积分榜；首季免除参赛费，奖池将按参赛联盟数量动态调整。

世界杯马上开始了，我不得不考虑这是我人生中的一次重大机会。 我认为今年世界杯最值得研究的地方：不是谁会夺冠，而是谁能在全球注意力失控之前，提前买到便宜的概率、便宜的流量和便宜的叙事。 为什么这么说？ 因为世界杯从来不只是四年一次的足球比赛，它更像是全球注意力在一个月内的集中爆破：球迷熬夜、品牌砸钱、平台抢用户、庄家开盘、交易员找错价、内容创作者抢流量，所有人都在同一个时间窗口里下注自己的判断。有人看球，有人买球衣，有人做酒吧生意，有人炒球星卡，有人做预测市场，有人靠一场冷门翻身，也有人在加时赛最后一分钟把本金清零。 如果说过去的世界杯发财靠的是线下门票、博彩、球衣、酒吧、广告和球星卡，那么今年最大的变化是：预测市场开始把世界杯变成一个可交易的链上资产池。 截至 2026-06-10 日，Polymarket 平台整体日成交量在近期数据中达到 $137.9M，未平仓金额约 $1.45B；而“2026 FIFA World Cup Winner”相关市场，已有新闻报道称累计成交量突破 $1.8B，法国和西班牙一度是冠军热门，市场隐含概率约 16% 左右。换句话说，比赛还没踢完，钱已经在链上跑了好几圈。 / - / “世界杯”历年玩法 1.最古老的发财方式，是把世界杯当成线下流量生意 酒吧、夜宵店、烧烤摊、酒店、旅游、转播包厢、球衣周边，这些都是传统玩法。世界杯期间，人的情绪会被赛程重新安排：凌晨也有人消费，冷门也会制造讨论，强队输球也能带动二次传播。对线下商家来说，发财的关键不是预测冠军，而是提前卡位：大屏、酒水套餐、球迷社群、主队主题夜、短视频传播，一套组合拳下来，比赛本身就是免费广告。 2.卖“情绪纪念品”。 球衣、围巾、贴纸、球星卡、纪念币、限量周边，都是世界杯注意力的实体化。比如 Panini 世界杯贴纸长期是球迷文化的一部分，2022 年世界杯贴纸集齐成本曾被媒体报道上升到很高水平；FIFA 年报也显示 2019–2022 周期总收入达到 $7.568B，世界杯相关授权、转播、商业权益本身就是巨大的产业链。 3.押注与交易 传统体育博彩里，世界杯一直是全球最大的投注场景之一。近期行业报道预计，2026 年世界杯全球体育博彩投注额可能达到 $60B 级别，北美三个主办国贡献约 $5.7B；另有媒体报道，美国市场对世界杯投注规模的预期可能超过许多传统体育大赛。 4.内容和流量套利 每届世界杯都会诞生一批“懂球帝”“反向明灯”“毒奶主播”“战术博主”“盘口复盘号”。真正赚到钱的人不一定是猜得最准的人，而是最会把观点产品化的人：赛前前瞻、赛后复盘、赔率异动、球星故事、冷门分析、短视频切片、社群付费、广告带货。世界杯不是一个月的比赛，而是一个月的内容牛市。 5.第五种方式，是今年最有新意的预测市场 Polymarket、Kalshi、Gate 等平台让“法国能不能夺冠”“美国能不能进几强”“某队能否小组第一”变成可买卖的概率。它和传统博彩最大的不同是：你不一定非要等结果出来才能赚钱。只要市场概率从 2% 涨到 6%，理论上就已经出现了数倍浮盈；你交易的是“概率变化”，不是只赌最终结果。 / - / “世界杯”今年变量 已检索数据：预测市场的资金已经提前拥挤。 Polymarket 的世界杯冠军市场已被多家新闻源报道累计成交量突破 $1.8B；当前市场数据里，法国冠军市场的未平仓金额约 $8.0M、7 日成交约 $7.7M，西班牙未平仓约 $4.7M、7 日成交约 $7.7M。这说明资金不是等决赛才来，而是在小组赛、伤病、阵容、舆论变化阶段就开始定价。 已检索数据：长尾球队也出现异常活跃。 在“World Cup Winner”搜索结果里，一些长尾球队的 7 日成交量非常高，例如刚果（金）相关市场 7 日成交约 $27.9M、埃及约 $17.6M、阿尔及利亚约 $14.1M、哥伦比亚约 $14.1M。这些不是说它们一定有冠军实力，而是说明长尾概率市场正在被大量交易，流动性已经足够吸引投机资金。 推演判断一： 今年的机会不在“猜冠军”，而在“猜市场会怎么重新定价”。 如果一个球队赛前隐含概率只有 0.2%–2%，但它第一场赢球、热门队受伤、同组混乱、舆论突然发酵，那么它的概率可能短期翻倍甚至数倍。这个过程中，即使它最终不夺冠，早期买入者也可能通过卖出概率上涨获利。 推演判断二： 预测市场会把世界杯拆成很多小型金融市场。 过去普通球迷只能买胜平负、冠军、比分；现在市场会拆成冠军、小组出线、小组第一、单场胜负、球员进球、红牌、晋级路径、甚至社交话题。盘口越碎，信息差越多；信息差越多，就越容易出现“以小博大”的窗口。 推演判断三： 世界杯会同时带动链上和链下两条发财线。 链上是 Polymarket、Kalshi、CEX 预测市场、体育概念 meme、球迷代币；链下是酒吧、内容账号、社群、周边、短视频、电商。真正稳的人，不会只押一个冠军，而是把注意力变成多个现金流入口。 / - / “世界杯”机会清单 1.低风险：内容流量号。 风险等级：★★☆☆☆ 这是最适合普通人的玩法。开赛前做球队前瞻、盘口观察、冷门分析；比赛中做实时评论；赛后做复盘和争议判罚拆解。它的本金不是钱，而是时间和执行力。最适合的内容方向包括（仅举例）： “每天三场比赛的概率变化” “Polymarket 盘口异动观察” “冷门队为什么被资金买入” “球星伤病如何影响冠军赔率” “普通人看不懂的世界杯钱流向” 发财逻辑： 你不是直接从比赛赚钱，而是从流量赚钱。广告、社群、课程、付费资讯、带货、赞助都可以变现。 最大风险： 内容同质化严重，必须有数据、有观点、有持续更新。 🟠 2.中低风险：世界杯社群和资讯产品。 风险等级：★★★☆☆ 世界杯期间，很多人不是缺比赛，而是缺“有人帮我筛信息”。如果你能做一个高质量社群，每天整理赛程、伤病、盘口变化、预测市场价格、关键新闻，就能把混乱的信息变成产品。 发财逻辑： 收会员费、社群费、广告费，或者导流到自己的内容账号。 最大风险： 如果过度承诺收益，容易变成非法荐赌或金融诈骗；必须定位成信息整理和研究，不承诺盈利。 🟠 3.中风险：预测市场价差交易。 风险等级：★★★☆☆ 这是今年最值得重点写的机会。比如同一个事件在 Polymarket、Kalshi、CEX 预测市场、传统博彩公司之间，可能出现不同隐含概率。如果 A 平台认为某队夺冠概率是 10%，B 平台认为是 13%，中间就可能有价差。 发财逻辑： 买低估概率，卖高估概率，或者在赔率变化中提前退出。 最大风险： 平台规则、结算标准、地区限制、手续费、流动性、提现、监管都会吃掉利润。 🟠 4.中高风险：长尾冠军票。 风险等级：★★★★☆ 这就是最典型的“以小博大”。买一个市场概率只有 0.2%–2% 的球队，不是因为它一定会夺冠，而是赌它在某个阶段被市场重新定价。比如第一场爆冷赢球、同组热门翻车、核心球员伤愈、淘汰赛路径变好，它的价格可能从 0.2% 涨到 1%，看似还是小概率，但账面已经是数倍变化。 发财逻辑： 不等夺冠，吃概率上修。 最大风险： 大多数长尾票最终归零；如果不提前设退出点，很容易从浮盈变废纸。 🟠 5.高风险：单场冷门与红牌类事件。 风险等级：★★★★★ 这种玩法最刺激，也最危险。世界杯单场比赛情绪极端，红牌、点球、VAR、伤停补时都可能瞬间改变结果。市场会在几秒钟内重定价，手慢的人可能只能接盘。 发财逻辑： 用小仓位押极端事件，比如冷门、平局、点球大战、红牌、弱队先进球。 最大风险： 信息延迟、盘口滑点、流动性不足、情绪上头，都会让人连续亏损。 🟠 6.高风险：体育概念 meme 和球迷代币。 风险等级：★★★★★ 世界杯期间，某些国家队、球星、吉祥物、梗图、球迷代币、体育 meme 可能突然暴涨。它们不是基本面资产，而是情绪资产。 发财逻辑： 提前埋伏叙事，等社交媒体爆发。 最大风险： 绝大多数会快速归零；庄家控盘、合约风险、假币、流动性抽走都很常见。 / - / 以小博大 今年世界杯的“以小博大”机会拆解： 第一层：买低概率，但不买纯幻想。 低概率不是乱买。真正值得研究的是“市场价格很低，但有路径改善可能”的球队或事件。比如同组结构较弱、赛程有利、防守稳定、点球能力强、核心球员伤愈、热门队内耗，这些都可能让市场概率上修。 第二层：买之前先想卖点。 很多人买长尾票时只想着“万一夺冠呢”，但专业一点的玩法应该是：“如果它从 1% 涨到 3%，我是否先卖一半？”世界杯预测市场最核心的不是信仰，而是退出纪律。以小博大不是拿到归零，而是拿到概率错价被修正。 第三层：不要只买冠军，买路径。 冠军市场最热，赔率也最容易被聪明钱盯住。反而是小组出线、小组第一、进八强、单场不败、某队进球数这类路径型市场，可能更容易出现错价。因为普通人只看冠军，专业交易员看晋级树。 第四层：盯资金流，而不是只盯新闻。 Polymarket @Polymarket 数据里，一些长尾世界杯冠军市场出现了高额 7 日成交和“smart money bullish”信号。这里不能简单理解为“聪明钱一定看好它夺冠”，更可能是资金在交易概率波动。但它至少说明：这些市场已经有足够流动性，适合短线概率交易。 第五层：用小仓位，而不是用人生梭哈。 真正的以小博大，应该是用 1%–5% 的娱乐仓去买非线性机会，而不是拿生活费赌奇迹。世界杯最容易让人上头，因为它有民族情绪、球星情怀和集体狂欢，但市场不会因为你热爱某支球队就给你返钱。 #世界杯赛程#

当AI开始走进物理世界，机器人也需要学会感受每一次接触。拿起一个物体，该用多大的力？碰到东西之后，又该怎样调整动作？这些我们习以为常的细节，都是机器人需要学习的东西。 在硅谷101 Alignment 2026大会上，帕西尼（PaXini AI）创始人兼CEO许晋诚博士介绍了团队研发的触觉与力觉传感器、灵巧手以及已累积超100万小时的OmniSharing DB数据集。从感知接触和受力，到让模型学习，再到准确执行动作，他分享了帕西尼如何把这些工作连接起来，让机器人感知世界、理解世界，并真正作用于世界。 当机器人能够感知环境，并从一次次操作中积累经验，它们离真正承担更多工作还有多远？这期，让我们回到Alignment 2026大会现场，听听帕西尼的探索。 大会嘉宾： 许晋诚，帕西尼（PaXini AI）创始人兼CEO

Agent 这两年最大的变化就是会主动上网找资料了 但你有没有想过，背后的成本有多离谱 推特 API 一个月一百美金起，YouTube 要 OAuth 申请，小红书直接风控拉黑，B 站弹幕接口三天两头改，让 Claude Code 搜个资料，跟打副本一样 直到我遇到Agent-Reach把这个局面直接掀了，GitHub 上一个叫 Panniantong 的开发者做的，完全开源免费 一条命令搞定 14 个平台的抓取全能跑，底层不是套壳，是把 yt-dlp、twitter-cli、xhs-cli 这些现成工具重新组装了一遍，相当于给你的 Agent 装了一双能抓数据的手 我下午试了下，让 Agent 抓某条小红书爆款下面的评论区，让它总结用户痛点，十秒钟出结果，200 多条评论，整理得明明白白。 之前干这事，要么自己写爬虫，要么买第三方 API，要么人肉复制粘贴。现在一句话搞定。 安装也简单，不用懂代码，直接跟你常用的 Agent 说，帮我安装 Agent Reach 它会自己 clone、自己配置、自己跑通测试 我用了两天，感觉这玩意儿才是 Agent 真正的脚，之前那些只会聊天的 Agent，顶多算个会说话的脑子，这才叫真·能干活。

《吻我之前，先把灯关了》 "Turn Off the Lights Before You Kiss Me" 据专家研究分析，恐怖片和爱情动作片，好莱坞惊险片都能刺激大脑分泌多巴胺，我现在把它们都放在一起了，那是不是应该双倍快乐来了。 According to expert research and analysis, horror movies, romantic action films, and Hollywood thrillers can all stimulate the brain to release dopamine. Since I’ve combined them all together, does that mean I’m in for a double dose of happiness? grok imagine prompt: "Turn Off the Lights Before You Kiss Me" 15 seconds, 9:16 vertical format, first-person perspective, recorded on a smartphone, single continuous take. [Realistic Cinematography] The footage is captured entirely by the rear-facing camera of the smartphone held by the male protagonist; no other cameras are involved. The male protagonist holds the phone in his right hand, using the primary (1×) rear lens—providing a field of view equivalent to approximately 26mm—at 1080p resolution and 30fps. The device is positioned between his chest and chin (at a height of roughly 1.45 meters), aimed toward a woman standing in the bathroom doorway. His left hand occasionally enters the frame to operate the light switch. The smartphone itself—its body, back panel, camera module, screen, or flash—is never visible in the shot. Only the light cast by the phone onto the subject, her clothing, and the walls can be seen. There are no mirrors present; this is not a mirror-based selfie. The footage retains the raw, authentic texture of smartphone video—no beauty filters, color grading, or cinematic effects. Skin details such as pores, fine beads of sweat, stray hairs, and natural skin-tone variations are visible. There is slight digital noise in the shadows, and brief motion blur occurs during rapid hand movements or moments of physical instability. Subtle camera shake stems from the holder’s breathing and wrist movements. Changes in proximity are achieved through actual physical steps or the subject pulling the holder closer; there is no digital zooming, automated panning, reverse-angle cutting, or slow motion. The focus remains primarily on the woman’s face, with only momentary hesitation when the distance shifts abruptly—there is no persistent out-of-focus effect. [Characters and Attire] The woman in the doorway (@80130fc6-f744-4f61-9faf-f630a1eb8638) is 28 years old. Her appearance—including her black hair styled in an updo, purple floral hair accessory, earrings, long-sleeved Japanese-style (wafuku) garment in purple (@d7529a1b-8cdb-41e5-816e-c59aa4051803), and dark-colored *obi* (sash)—is consistent with the video uploaded by the user. Her clothing remains intact; the neckline stays in place, and she does not scratch her own chest or tug at her garments. Leaning slightly against the doorframe, she keeps her shoulders relaxed and lowered, her neck elongated, and her legs positioned one in front of the other—creating a natural, subtle S-curve in her posture. She gazes toward the male protagonist with half-lidded eyes and a faint, inviting smile, as if beckoning him closer. From the very beginning, her right hand holds a small pinch of fabric from the male protagonist’s left cuff. This point of contact—her right hand gripping his left cuff—is situated in the lower-left portion of the frame and must remain visible. Because she is only holding the fabric rather than clamping down on his wrist, he retains the freedom to lift his left hand and operate the light switch. Initially, her left hand is concealed between her body and the doorframe. The grayish-white fingers that appear later belong to this same hand; the creature possesses only two hands throughout the entire sequence. The real girlfriend is located in the hallway behind the male protagonist. She is present only as a voice calling out from off-screen; she is never shown on camera, and no second female face appears. 【Environment and Space】 The scene takes place at the entrance to a bathroom in an old apartment building late at night. The setting—featuring aged off-white tiles, a worn wooden doorframe, a standard wall-mounted light switch, and a towel hanging inside the bathroom—conveys the lived-in, weathered feel of an old residence, rather than a ruin. The woman is positioned slightly to the right of the frame’s center, with the open bathroom door behind her. The light switch is located on the wall to the left, approximately thirty centimeters from the male protagonist’s left hand. It is visible from the start and does not suddenly appear later. Behind the male protagonist lies a hallway. The bathroom door remains open inward; the camera angle stays consistent throughout, the door does not move on its own, and the room’s layout remains unchanged. At the start, the woman’s face is about sixty centimeters from the camera. After she gives a gentle tug on his cuff, the male protagonist shifts forward slightly, reducing the distance to approximately forty-five centimeters. The distance closes further only during the final dragging motion. 【Ambient Lighting】 At the beginning, a warm-white overhead light in the bathroom is on, illuminating the woman’s head, shoulders, and the doorway, while the hallway remains dim. The LED flash on the back of the smartphone is illuminated from the very first frame; it remains on and in the same position throughout the entire 15-second duration. Up close, the face is illuminated by the harsh, direct light of a standard mobile phone; small shadows form beside the nose and under the chin, and there are localized highlights on the fabric of the clothing—no artificial "beauty" fill lighting is applied. The only light the male lead turns off is the overhead bathroom light. Once the overhead light is extinguished, the bathroom background remains dim and does not brighten on its own. The phone’s light continues to illuminate her face and the hand gripping the sleeve cuff. The camera’s auto-exposure adjusts only slightly, failing to brighten the dark bathroom to a daylight-like state. When the "mask" (the outer layer of the face) is peeled back, it is illuminated by the same mobile phone light as the rest of the face. The space deep behind the shell remains dark, and the exposed eyeball shows only natural, subtle reflections—it does not emit its own light. [The "False Face" Effect] The horror stems from a thin, pliable, artificial layer being peeled back from within—it is not a case of natural skin being torn or a mouth stretching into an impossible, elongated shape. A grayish-white hand—with only two or three fingertips visible—emerges from the corner of her mouth, hooks onto the lower edge of the "mask," and peels half of the face upward and to the side. The "mask" has a distinct thickness and flexibility; the cheek and part of the area beside the nose fold back, rather than stretching into long, tubular, funnel-like, or tongue-like shapes. Behind the peeled-back section lies a deep, dark cavity containing a normal-sized human eye, which turns to look directly at the camera. The other half of the woman’s face remains intact, establishing the premise that there is an artificial layer on the outside, with something else concealed beneath it. There is no blood, gore, exposed muscle, black ooze, or liquid-like melting effect. The grayish hand does not reach in from off-screen; its fingertips must first emerge from within the corner of the mouth. [Strict 15-Second Timeline] 0–4 Seconds | Gripping the sleeve, an invitation to draw closer. The woman leans sideways against the doorframe, looking first into the male lead’s eyes, then glancing briefly toward the light switch on the left. With her right hand, she grasps the male lead’s left sleeve cuff—positioned at the bottom-left of the frame—and gives it a gentle tug toward herself. The fabric of the cuff pulls taut, prompting the male lead to take a small step forward; the camera moves in tandem with his approach. She lifts her chin slightly and says in a low voice: “The lights are too bright.” Her tone is intimate, with a suppressed smile playing at the corners of her mouth. There is no sign of a monstrous visage, nor does she glance toward her own mouth beforehand. Her right hand continues to hold the same spot on his sleeve; she does not shift her grip to his lapel. 4–7 seconds | Flipping the switch; the background darkens The male protagonist reaches out with his left hand toward a light switch already visible on the left side of the frame. She keeps her grip on his left sleeve, causing her right arm to extend naturally as he moves—she neither lets go nor suffers any "clipping" (graphical glitching). His fingertips press the switch, producing a distinct *click*. The bathroom overhead light goes out, and the tiles, towels, and the space behind the woman grow noticeably darker. Her face remains illuminated by the fill light from a mobile phone. The male protagonist’s left hand pulls away from the switch and returns to the space between them. The camera tilts slightly with the movement, then steadies. 7–9 seconds | A warning from behind From about two meters behind the camera, the man’s actual girlfriend calls out urgently, in an identical tone: “Don’t turn off the light!” The woman in front of him says nothing; her lip movements do not correspond to this warning. As the male protagonist begins to turn, the camera shifts slightly to the side—but the hand gripping his sleeve suddenly tightens, holding him in place. Her smile vanishes. Her eyes glance past the camera toward the space behind the man, then return to the lens. Her knuckles whiten as she grips the sleeve, causing deeper creases to form in the fabric. 9–12 seconds | Half of her face is peeled back from within Two or three grayish-white fingertips emerge from the inner corner of her mouth. The fingertips hook onto the lower edge of the "shell" of her face, slowly peeling it upward and outward. The corner of her mouth and her cheek—forming a single, thin, pliable layer—fold back together; the lips do not stretch or elongate independently. Half of the artificial face is lifted away, revealing an eye in the darkness beneath that shifts to look directly at the camera. The intact half of her face remains visible alongside the eye revealed from within. For a brief moment, the camera steadies, allowing at least half a second to take in the details: Fingers emerge from within the face; the "shell" of the face begins to fold back, revealing another eye underneath. The woman’s right hand maintains a firm grip on the man’s left cuff—she cannot let go, even as she peels back the face. The only sounds are the dry, grating friction of the mask and the man’s sudden, sharp intake of breath. 12–15 seconds | The grip shifts into a forceful tug. The man immediately grabs the woman’s right wrist—the one holding his cuff—and tries to pry it away. The point of contact is clearly visible; he does not reach for the grey, peeling fingers. The creature’s right arm suddenly retracts toward the bathroom, yanking the cuff hard. The sequence must be clear: The cuff goes taut → the man’s left arm is pulled straight → his body stumbles forward → the camera (held in his right hand) is dragged closer. The camera moves from about 45 centimeters away to roughly 15 centimeters, accompanied by a sudden dip and tilt—this is not a smooth, controlled zoom. The partially peeled-back face, the unblinking eye beneath, and the greyish-white fingers now dominate the frame. The other half of the face remains "normal," preserving its original appearance. In the final half-second, the man collides with the wooden doorframe, producing a dull thud. The camera jerks to the side; the edge of the facial shell sweeps across the lens, partially obscuring the view. The recording ends abruptly while the struggle is still underway. No fade to black, no additional dialogue, and no new creatures appear. [Ambient Audio] Captured via a mobile phone microphone: close-range speech, the friction of fabric at the cuff, the sound of a light switch, the hum of a bathroom exhaust fan, the distant ambient noise of the city, heavy breathing, and the final impact against the doorframe. The exhaust fan continues to run independently; it does not stop when the overhead light is switched off. The background sounds maintain a sense of spatial distance—they are not suddenly muted for the sake of a "jump scare." The opening line, "The light is too bright," comes from the woman in front of him. The mid-sequence line, "Don't turn off the light," clearly originates from behind the man; the woman in front does not move her lips. There is no further dialogue—no sinister laughter, voice-over narration, heartbeat sound effects, or pre-recorded horror audio cues. [Mandatory Continuity] The only camera is the mobile phone through which the audience is viewing the scene; the phone itself is never visible within the frame, nor is there any additional camera operator. The male protagonist holds the phone in his right hand; he uses his left hand to flip the light switch, then immediately grabs the monster’s right wrist. The monster’s right hand remains firmly gripping the same spot on the male protagonist’s left cuff; its left hand lifts a portion of the "false face" from underneath. Do not generate a third hand, swap left and right hands, or have the monster’s hand shift its grip from the cuff to the female protagonist’s own clothing. Once the bathroom light is turned off, it remains off; the mobile phone’s light source (fill light) stays on. The positions of the door and the light switch remain fixed. Changes in distance must be achieved through physical movement (stepping or dragging); do not use digital zoom. The "false face" should be lifted, not stretched like rubber; do not generate long tongues, tubular mouths, an elongated jaw, or a melting face.

10/22 很多人今天应该很心痛，AI 板块惨遭血洗。我希望大家冷静思考，当市场恐慌时，是最好的机会 长话短说，我的投研模型告诉我，今天存在了错杀。如果你还没有仓位，可以考虑开仓。我的投资周期是三年起步，今天进行了抄底，ROI 很不错 这个帖子我会详细阐述： 1. 今天下跌的原因 2. 为什么我觉得现在 $MRVL 性价比很高 1. 今天发生了什么, 为什么我觉得市场又开始左右脑互搏非常混乱？ 如果你看完以下五条消息，觉得逻辑不通，那恭喜你，发现了机会 > $Meta： 三季度自由现金流 −21.2 亿美元。AI 基建订单继续上涨，管理层曾表示，Muse 创造了更多的价值，需要更多的算力 > $LRCX：收入创纪录，但指引只够共识。CFO 说供应链卡住了，市场读成"明年没法再超预期"，股价 −11% > 伊朗风险： 布伦特油价推到 112，宏观风险 > 拥挤仓位放大跌幅： 上周 3 倍做多芯片 ETF（SOXL）净流入 70 亿，创纪录。市场需要收割 > 摩根大通 Panigirtzoglou（今天表示）：AI 股抛售可能接近极限，仓位已经重置 > 高盛交易台：对冲基金空头杠杆在 99 分位，反弹时可能逼空 结果是费半 −6.2%，光模块 −10% 到 −13%，看起来市场又开始左右脑互搏了。这是我最喜欢的混乱时间 2. 现在跌得够不够，取决于你想要的年化回报率 我还是以我最喜欢的 $MRVL 来说，为什么我今天继续买入 根据我的模型和三组假设，现价对应持有到 2030 年初年化约 11%–17%。大致合理、略偏便宜，谈不上远远低估。想拿 15% 年化，对应价格约 200–234 美元。今天价格224$。我觉得合理，继续买入 $MRVL 历史回撤： 2024 年以来跌超 15% 的中位跌幅是 22%，现在离 10/6 收盘正好跌了这么多。跌超 45% 的有两次，按 6 月高点算约 174 美元。我不怕跌，越跌越买 根据我的估值模型，按照管理层、投资者会议时候的收入、利润路径，目前市场给出了按照 MRVL CEO 给出的最佳路径的 60% 的失败概率 我觉得这个有点低了。在这几年我对 MRVL 管理层的观察下来，他们说的话还是相当可信的 篇幅有限，大家可以按照这个思路推理一下你关注的股票

业绩好小跌、业绩差暴跌！美国科技股深陷“恶性循环” 摘要：台积电Q2净利润暴增77%，其美股周四仍收跌2.3%，IBM发盈利预警，引发周二单日暴跌逾20%。分析人士认为，其核心原因在于：一是投资者担忧AI高估值与巨额支出回报，业绩预期门槛极高导致基本面与股价严重背离；二是市场正经历系统性去杠杆与动量交易瓦解，主导走势的已非基本面而是仓位结构。 美国科技股正陷入一种令投资者进退两难的困境：亮眼的财报无法提振股价，糟糕的业绩则引发暴跌。这一非对称的市场反应，正在动摇华尔街对AI投资叙事的信心，并加速资金从高估值科技股中撤离。 台积电周四公布季度净利润同比暴增77%，创历史纪录，并上调2026年营收增长预期至40%以上，但其美股收盘仍下跌2.3%。与此同时，IBM因发出盈利预警，周二单日暴跌逾20%，跌幅甚至超过1987年"黑色星期一"。Vital Knowledge分析师一语道破当前困局： "科技股似乎怎么都赢不了——超预期业绩无法催生上涨，业绩爆雷则遭到重创。"  市场分析人士认为，投资者担忧AI高估值与巨额支出回报，业绩预期门槛极高导致基本面与股价严重背离，再加上市场正经历系统性去杠杆与动量交易瓦解，主导走势的已非基本面而是仓位结构。 纳斯达克综合指数周四下跌1.5%，存储与芯片股领跌，闪迪、西部数据、Seagate均跌逾9%，英特尔与美光各跌约6%。美股半导体板块已从6月中旬高点累计下跌约22%，正式进入技术性熊市。高盛追踪的"动量股"指数周四单日下挫6%，本月以来已累计蒸发五分之一市值。  好业绩遭"冷遇"，市场逻辑已变 本轮科技股调整最令市场警惕之处，在于强劲基本面与股价走势之间的严重背离。 华尔街见闻文章写道，台积电不仅Q2净利润同比大增77%至创纪录的7066亿新台币（约合220亿美元），毛利率高达67.7%，还将2026年资本支出上调至600亿至640亿美元。ASML此前也公布了"超预期并上调指引"的季报。美光的最新季度业绩同样大幅超出预期，但股价自高点以来已回调约25%。 市场分析人士认为，三家公司的业绩均进一步强化了AI驱动需求加速扩张的叙事，为AI资本支出与算力投资逻辑提供了新的正面数据支撑。然而，半导体与存储股在如此积极的催化剂面前依然下行，表明当前主导价格走势的，或许已不再是基本面，而是仓位结构与因子动态——同时也意味着硬件板块的业绩预期门槛已被抬得极高。 值得关注的是，曾被视为AI热潮象征的SpaceX，也未能幸免于难。 SpaceX上月以创纪录的860亿美元估值完成IPO，发行价135美元，一度飙升至225.64美元的高位，吸引大量散户资金涌入。然而周四其股价再度下跌3.1%至131.11美元，已跌破发行价。  这一走势折射出投资者对AI相关公司高估值的普遍反思。据英国《金融时报》报道，部分投资者对美国科技巨头在数据中心上的巨额支出何时能够产生实质回报愈发感到担忧。 谷歌周四股价下跌4.4%，亚马逊下跌1.2%，"超大规模云计算商"发行的债券近期也因其庞大的借贷与支出计划受到质疑而承压。 芯片股走势，成全市场风向标 在多重压力交织之下，半导体板块的走向已成为整个股市的核心观察指标。 分析人士认为，"芯片股未来的走势仍是股市最重要的问题。它们正在出现一些明显裂痕，因此必须尽快看到强劲且可持续的反弹，否则将发出真正的警示信号。" 目前，半导体板块整体已从6月中旬高点下跌约22%，正式步入技术性熊市。在ASML、美光、三星等公司业绩超预期后股价反遭抛售的背景下，高贝塔动量策略再度大幅受挫。  市场的隐含相关性仍接近历史低位，与VIX指数明显脱钩，显示当前的波动更多源于结构性因子的重新定价，而非系统性恐慌——但这并不意味着风险已经出清。 去杠杆浪潮持续，动量交易加速瓦解 此轮抛售的背后，是一场始于6月的系统性去杠杆过程。 摩根大通策略师Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou表示，"始于6月的投资者去杠杆阶段似乎仍在持续，我们认为杠杆股票ETF、期权及保证金账户中仍有更多去杠杆空间，这将成为股市的持续阻力。" 高盛数据显示，整个人工智能领域都面临压力，其中光互联、人工智能半导体和数据中心板块在过去两天均下跌了5%至12%。 高盛追踪的动量股指数本月已累计下跌约20%，且据高盛分析，经波动率调整后，当前这一因子对的波动率已升至五年高位，接近标普500三周已实现波动率的10倍。 有分析指出，AI相关股票与"AI风险"股票、对冲基金重仓股与做空股、高贝塔12个月赢家与输家之间，均出现了"方向错误"的价格走势，显示市场内部结构已出现明显紊乱