今年读到的好书：《What I Learned About Investing from Darwin》。用进化论框架重新理解价值投资，投资的终极智慧与自然选择的核心法则一致,书中提出了三条法则—— 避免重大风险、 以合理价格买优质资产、 学会「非常懒惰」。 说到底是一件事：先活着。 这么多年结合个人经历回头看，亏钱多半因为手太勤,共勉

韩股今天涨成这鬼样子了，别说三星海力士了，几乎都是不讲逻辑无脑涨 给大家整理了一下韩股投资工具包： 1. 国人开户投资韩股 2. 韩股行情+新闻网站 3. 韩国彭博 4. 英文界面韩股筛选器 5. Tradingview韩股 6. Investing韩股 7. 韩国股吧

In-Depth Investigation: Seizing the Commanding Heights of the Intelligent Era — A Survey of China's Artificial Intelligence Industry Development 深度调研 | 抢占智能时代制高点：我国人工智能产业发展调查 By "Joint Research Team of Qiushi Economics Editorial Department and CCID Research Institute" Translation Interesting comments about Nvidia

周末阅读《币安人生》，翻到了 180-182页关于币安被盗 7000枚比特币(2019年5月8日)的经历，颇有共呜。 好巧不巧，在我加入 Trust Wallet 前一个月的圣诞节，插件钱包因为人为小过失，让骇客有机可乘。 @cz_binance 在情况还未被完全诊断清楚之前，率先发推转达Trust Wallet愿意赔偿。 调查后来发现：骇客通过恶意程序渗透了几名员工的电脑，在代码中植入了恶意指令。虽然管理助记词和私钥的核心安全组件并未被攻破，但插件钱包v2.68确实被植入了恶意代码，情况和2019年币安那次类似。在漏洞修复前的短短数小时内打开过插件钱包的用户受到了牵连。 时至今天，@TrustWallet 已加固安全揩施、每天活跃用户量不降反升，对受影响用户赔付进度也已完成95%。而对于已错过申请赔付最后限期的长尾用户，CZ 认为只要对方带著合理凭证，Trust Wallet 该继续受理，「做正确的事」。 Funds are SAFU，从不是一句口号，而是用行动写下的承诺。 Weekend reading Freedom of Money, I reached pages 180-182 about Binance’s May 8, 2019 hack where 7,000 BTC were stolen. It resonated with me. Coincidentally, one month before I joined Trust Wallet, the extension wallet was compromised during Christmas. CZ immediately tweeted that Trust Wallet would reimburse users, even before the issue was fully diagnosed. The investigation showed it was similar to 2019: hackers used malware to infect employee computers and injected malicious code into v2.68 (deprecated). The core seed phrase security was never breached — only users who opened the extension wallet in the few hours before the fix were affected. Today, Trust Wallet has strengthened security, daily active users are up, and 95% of affected users have been compensated. For the remaining vicitms who missed the deadline, CZ believes Trust Wallet should still accept claims with valid proof. Funds are SAFU — not just a slogan, but a promise backed by action.

早上起来以为我看错了，Kraken 这么大个所谓的合规 CEX 竟然堂而皇之的上了诈骗项目 @intodotspace ，瞬间对 Kraken 一点好感都没了，只觉得恶心🤮。 这上币组是被屎还是给的一点上币费蒙蔽了眼睛？连最基本的调研都不做的吗？这垃圾玩意儿诈骗了那么多打新的人，到现在一分钱没退一个币没发，怎么通过“合规”的？ 妈的如果给点钱💰就什么狗屎都能上，就别把自己标榜成白莲花好吗？本来大家踩了 Space 这坨狗屎算倒霉了，现在Kraken 还要把狗屎捡起来塞大家嘴里。 大清早的真把我恶心坏了。 强烈建议 Kraken 团队调查一下自己的listing 团队是否拿了脏钱，如果没拿那他们真的可以被 fire 掉了! Woke up this morning thinking I was seeing things — Kraken, this supposedly "compliant" major CEX, actually listed a straight-up scam project @intodotspace. Lost every bit of respect I had for them instantly. Just disgusting 🤮 Did their listing team get paid in shit, or did someone slip them a little listing fee to blind them completely? Can't even do the most basic due diligence? This garbage project scammed so many people in their public sale, hasn't refunded a single cent or delivered a single token — and somehow it passes their "compliance" review? If all it takes is a little money 💰 to get any piece of crap listed, then stop pretending you're some virtuous, white-glove exchange. People already stepped in the Space turd and got burned — now Kraken goes and picks that turd back up and shoves it in everyone's mouth. Ruined my whole morning. Absolutely disgusting.🤢🤢🤢🤢 Strongly urge the @krakenfx team to investigate whether their listing team took dirty money. And if they somehow didn't — they should be fired anyway. This listing is seriously damaging your CEX's reputation and brand, and driving users away.

来了来了——基于 Zama FHE 协议的 首个自托管银行 要来了。 @raycashxyz 团队把“链上隐私”和“传统支付体验”整合到一起，自托管银行由此诞生了。 不同于传统银行，自托管银行的余额和交易在链上是 完全加密 的，既能计算、能验证，又不需要信托机构代持。 换句话说： 你的钱不进别人手里 协议（@zama）也看不到你的账户余额 但系统依然能正常工作 他们的目标非常务实： 链上： 资产是你的，别人动不了 链下： 仍然能用借记卡、IBAN 做支付、兑换、质押 安全与隐私由协议保证，而不是靠人品或机构背书。 如果真能做成，体验会非常接近一个功能完善的银行账户—— 但资产 完全在你自己的钱包里，没人能冻你、卡你、动你、替你保管。 整体感觉这不是在“发明新银行概念”， 而是把加密世界该有的底层安全性 和现实世界金融该有的可用性 真正整合成一个 终于能落地的东西。 @zama #ZamaCreatorProgram# Here it comes — the first self-custodial bank built on Zama’s FHE protocol is on the horizon. The @raycashxyz team is combining on-chain confidentiality with the traditional payment experience, and that’s what makes a true self-custodial banking model possible. Unlike traditional banks, balances and transactions are fully encrypted on-chain. They can still be computed, validated, and processed — without any trusted custodian. In other words: Your money never sits in someone else’s hands Even @zama can’t see your balance Yet the system runs smoothly Their goals are impressively practical: On-chain: your assets are yours — no one can touch them Off-chain: you can still use debit cards, IBAN, payments, swaps, staking Security and privacy come from the protocol itself, not from human trust. If they succeed, the experience will feel like a fully functional bank account — except all assets stay entirely in your own wallet, immune to freezes, holds, or custodial risk. This doesn’t feel like “inventing a new type of bank.” It feels like merging crypto-level security with real-world financial usability into something that can finally be deployed. @zama #ZamaCreatorProgram#

@RealMidasTrend 哈哈，太有趣了！😁 现代AI视频现在能做到几乎和真人 indistinguishable，单看视觉很难100%确定。但这个明显是AI生成的搞笑剪辑/合成视频，把各位大佬的表情动作同步成集体表演，创意满分！ 不是真人真实演出，而是AI魔术~ 🎭