DEV UPDATES 001 | Reliability Week A lot of this week was spent on making Tradoor more reliable under the hood. Here’s what the dev team worked through: 🔹 Improved Options and Turbo Mode on-chain trade execution, including “Index Price Expired” and incorrect “Insufficient Balance” errors 🔹 Fixed failed on-chain trades continuing to appear in Positions and Trade History 🔹 Addressed intermittent wallet connection issues across the website and Telegram Bot 🔹 Fixed an issue preventing liquidity providers from withdrawing from the V3 Pool 🔹 Built out frontend and backend CI + automated testing to catch problems earlier More updates coming soon. Thank you for your continued support and feedback. With love, The Tradoor devs 🧑‍🚀

Top 10 BNB Smart Chain Tokens by Community Votes Today 📊 KINKAJOU | @kinka_token Wiki cat | @wikicatcoin JustCat| @Just_Cat_Coin CATALYST | @catalystcoin_ BNBGOAT | @BGOAT_001 SAFEMARS| @SafemarsTokenn Crime Lizard | @CrimeLizardBNB Giant Token | @GiantToken Aidefi | @Aideficoin_ Casino| @Casinotokenbnb

Top 10 BNB Smart Chain Tokens by Community Votes Today 📊 🔸KINKAJOU | @kinka_token 🔸Wiki cat | @wikicatcoin 🔸JustCat | @Just_Cat_Coin 🔸CATALYST | @catalystcoin_ 🔸BNBGOAT | @BGOAT_001 🔸ZUBA THE SUPER DOG | @zubatoken 🔸Aidefi | @Aideficoin_ 🔸Casino | @Casinotokenbnb 🔸Crime Lizard | @CrimeLizardBNB 🔸Giant Token | @GiantToken

Welcome to CHAINISLE MAGAZINE. Stories behind the creators. We believe every creator has a journey that deserves to be told—not through metrics or follower counts, but through the experiences that shaped who they are. Creator Spotlight | Episode 001 Meet Laura @ExploreLaura — a Web3 creator, lifelong learner, and one of the rising voices building the future of the creator economy. Behind her calm confidence is a story of resilience, responsibility, and continuous growth. 📖 Read her cover story on Medium: 🎥 Watch the official Creator Spotlight documentary: 🌸 The future belongs to those who keep moving forward. #CHAINISLE# #CreatorSpotlight# #Web3Creators# #Web3# #CreatorEconomy#

#Exclusive# | DUSU VP @DeepanshuS_001 stated that internal politics and mismanagement within the student wing prevented deserving candidates backed by common students and Gen Z from getting tickets. Commenting on the election outcome, Shokeen noted, "Internal politics within the NSUI leadership broke the trust of students and caused the loss to the organisation." Shokeen added that while Rahul Gandhi's Chhatron Ki Goonj initiative connects well with students, organizational issues at the leadership level damaged the student body's performance. #DeepanshuShokeen# #DUSUElections# #NSUI# #StudentPolitics# #ChhatronKiGoonj# | @anjalipandey06

🔎AAOI has sold 8.11 million of its own shares for about $1.1 billion since March | Friday's $600M shelf is the third this year $AAOI A $600 million shelf was registered at exactly the same size three months ago. What Applied Optoelectronics $AAOI filed after the close on August 21 lets it sell up to $600 million of its own stock into the market. The May 14 shelf was for exactly $600 million too. What differs is the share price the paperwork assumes: the May filing used $223.10, this one uses the August 20 close of $129.10. On Monday the shares sold off from Friday's $124.82 close and touched $102.10. When you pay in stock, the dollar amount can stay the same while the number of shares does not. The quarterly report filed on August 6 carries the month-by-month record. - March: 3,753,300 shares / weighted average $104.03 / $390.4 million - April: 1,077,126 shares / $101.72 / $109.6 million - May: 1,943,789 shares / $181.24 / $352.3 million - June: 1,001,308 shares / $197.26 / $197.5 million Four months, 7,775,523 shares, $1,049.8 million gross. Net of commissions the company kept $1,028.8 million. There were two shelves. The first opened at $250 million on February 26, was raised to $500 million on March 12, and was used up by April 2: about 4.8 million shares at a weighted average of $103.51. That is why March and April add to exactly $500 million. The second was the $600 million shelf of May 14. It sold $549.8 million in May and June, then another 332,428 shares for roughly $49.2 million after June 30. As of August 20 that came to $599.0 million, leaving about $1 million of the $600 million. The third shelf was registered the next day. Why the drawing does not stop shows up on the investing side of the same report. Net cash used in investing for the first half was $633.7 million, 8.4 times the $75.2 million of a year earlier. Capital expenditures accounted for $335.1 million of it ($169.0 million in the US, $62.8 million in Taiwan, $103.3 million in China). Most of the rest is prepayment for equipment and buildings: other assets, net swelled from $50.9 million at year-end to $324.0 million at June 30. That is machinery paid for but not yet delivered. First-half revenue was $343.1 million, so the cash that went out through investing is close to twice what came in through sales. It did not come from operations. Operating cash flow for the half was an outflow of $73.8 million. Very little came from banks: net line-of-credit borrowings of $22.2 million in the half, plus $1.7 million of notes payable and long-term debt, with $106.5 million of credit lines still undrawn at June 30. Over the same six months the ATM netted $1,028.8 million. It came from the share count. The company is not hiding this. The August 6 report says the Board may authorize additional issuance of common stock under an at-the-market offering in the future should additional liquidity be needed. The August 21 8-K says the company has no obligation to sell any shares and may suspend sales at any time. Nor are the proceeds tied to capital spending: the filing lists general corporate purposes, which may include debt repayment, working capital, capital expenditures and acquisitions. The shelf is a right, not a duty. A right costs whatever the stock is worth on the day it is exercised. At $197.26 a share, $600 million costs 3.04 million shares. At $107, a level the stock touched on Monday, it costs 5.61 million. The ownership one share bought in June now takes 1.84 shares. The capital budget can hold perfectly still, and the share price will still decide how much ownership leaves the existing holders. Shares outstanding went from 74,998,000 at year-end to 84,906,289 on August 20, up 13.2%. Of the 9.9 million added, 8,107,951 came out of these shelves. Monday's decline reached 18% at its worst, more than three times the 5.5% dilution implied by selling $600 million at $129.10. That gap is wider than the size of the shelf alone explains, and my read is that what the market is watching is how fast a shelf empties. The November quarterly report will carry the next rows of that same monthly table. The weighted average from July through August 20 was about $148. If the rows from September sit well below that, the third shelf was sold into the decline. The $600 million on the shelf is not a statement of how much this company needs. It is a statement of how much it is willing to pay in stock. The scale of the need sits on the other side of the report, in the $633.7 million that went out through investing in the first half, and that figure does not shrink when the stock does. Factories are priced in dollars. What moves is only the amount of ownership handed over to pay for them. 🤘Information Source Stock Slayer :

Zeekr 001 suspension check The Zeekr 001 delivers 272 hp (200 kW) in its single-motor RWD setup and 544 hp (400 kW) in dual-motor AWD variants, reaching 0–100 km/h in 3.8 seconds. In Europe, pricing starts at €59,990 for the Long Range RWD model and reaches €70,990 for the top-tier Privilege AWD trim.

5,001 American colleges get 950 hours of paperwork each from an Education Department rule published on Thursday. It measured the burden on one accrediting body and on none of the colleges. The rule is called Accreditation, Innovation, and Modernization. At the Department's own wage that is $95,551 per college, and $478 million across all 5,001 of them. The whole rule is priced at $490 million a year!! Accreditors are the private bodies that decide which colleges can take federal student aid. More than $120 billion a year moves through that gate. The rule rewrites how they operate, so the Department worked out the cost. 470 hours per agency, priced at the median wage for a postsecondary administrator and doubled for overhead, which comes to $47,273. Against a $600,000 budget that is about 8%, and 8% cleared the Department's threshold. The colleges get three separate assignments. 10 hours to read the rule. 470 for teach-out plans, which are the arrangements for students when a college shuts. Another 470 for new transfer credit disclosures. Its reason for not examining any of that is one sentence. Institutions of higher education are not directly regulated by the proposed rule and could only be indirectly impacted. It adds that data on the impact of accreditation regulations on institutions are not available, in a document that already contains tables of institution hours broken out by public, private and for profit. The rule's own text disagrees about who is being regulated. The institution must publicly disclose within ten business days. The institution must inform the student. The institution must provide a written rationale for every course whose credit it refuses. And no, this is not a drafting slip!! Directly regulated is a term of art under the Regulatory Flexibility Act and courts have read it narrowly since 1985, so the Department has a real argument. It would be an easier argument if the same document did not command institutions by name, list them as paperwork respondents, and cost their hours in three separate tables. The threshold is worth your attention too. The Department defines a substantial number of small entities as more than 5% of them, then notes there are fewer than twenty institutional accreditors, so any single one is over 5%. With nineteen entities, one is 5.26%. That prong cannot return no. Note that the count is the Department's own, and its public directory of institutional accreditors lists more than twenty. The mechanism is a definition that decides the answer before the question is asked. One threshold is written so it always triggers. One exclusion is written so the analysis never runs on the group carrying the cost. Watch the comment docket for a single small college filing its own hour count, and watch whether the final rule contains an institution-level analysis that this one says is impossible!!