ICPs are moving upstream. If you feels that “paying $50 for a service every month is getting too expensive” then you can rest assured that most software business definitely don’t want you as their customer. Just as people expect to be able to build more with AI, vendors will expect their customers to churn because of it. Expect them to spend even less time catering to their weakest customer segments in the months to come.

Who is building this? Input: human-edited podcasts (over 100 examples, raw+edited audio+Pro Tools Files) + 1 unedited podcast recording + custom episode-specific prompt AI: Magic Output: 1 edited podcast episode, ready to publish

You know these Star Trek LCARS interfaces that always looked like they were specifically designed to answer a plot-driven question visually and were never the same, always looked haphazardly constructed in that moment? I think, yet again, Star Trek understands the user interfaces of the future better than we do in the present. I think we are a very short time away from applications designing and assembling UI in the moment versus having it pre-designed. Contextual interfaces won't just consider what they present, but also who they're showing it to (on a highly (inter-)personal level) and when those people need which information in their workflow.

Let's say I want to spawn a small team of agents with a job-specific Markdown config, allow them to use a defined number of gated APIs (and public web search), and then run autonomously doing background work. What's a non-vendor-lock-in way to run these today?

If you trim down your prompts, you’re making it worse. At best, you repeat yourself, you re-describe ideas in several ways, you go on tangents, and you explore way beyond the initial scope. More context means more clarity, at least for the LLM.

Why does it feel like such a MASSIVE waste of time to watch Claude deliberate and talk to itself for 20 minutes during its planning phase, but it's perfectly fine to brainstorm, discuss, draft and re-draft a spec (v4.final.2.final.md) for 2 hours in a meeting of 5 people?