5.5 yo, 4.5 yo and 2.5 yo have started included 9 month old in their imaginary play and the roles they give baby are hilarious Bakery… baby is “the giant croissant” Construction site… baby is “swishy wrecking ball” Have kids.

GPT-5.6 is a major step forward for health intelligence. Across the lineup, we’re delivering stronger performance at lower cost: GPT-5.6 Luna outperforms GPT-5.5 at its highest reasoning setting while costing 25x less. Together, these advances raise quality while making advanced models accessible to more people globally.

Fable 5 vs GPT-5.5 Pro on single-file HTML animations Task: Generate self-contained HTML for three physics-heavy scenes with no external dependencies: - Jenga collapse 🪵 - Mechanical watch assembling ⏱️ - Wrecking ball demolishing a building 🏗️ The mechanical watch generated by GPT-5.5 is really impressive

GLM-5.2 is now just 0.005 away from Fable-5 in visual spec-to-app development. On VISTA’s latest C4 leaderboard: 🥇 Claude Code + Fable-5 — 0.274 🥈 Claude Code + GLM-5.2 — 0.269 🥉 Claude Code + Opus 4.8 — 0.263 　 Claude Code + Sonnet 4.6 — 0.248 　 Cursor + Composer 2.5 — 0.212 　 Codex + GPT-5.5 — 0.205 The story is no longer just “which model writes better code.” For real app-building agents, performance is increasingly shaped by the full stack: 🧠 model 🛠️ harness 🔁 tool loop 👁️ visual understanding ⚙️ reasoning setup The harness is becoming part of the model. 🔗

A 5.5 magnitude earthquake struck China's Sichuan province, centered in Gaoxian County, Ebin City, at a depth of 6 kilometers. There were no casualties, and authorities quickly evacuated residents and provided assistance and support.

Fable 5 taking the top 4 spots on Cursor Bench is actually insane. Max hits 72.9%, then Extra High 72.0%, High 70.6%, Medium 69.8% — while Opus 4.7 Max is 64.8% and GPT-5.5 Extra High is 64.3%. That’s not a bump. That’s a real leap.