Register and share your invite link to earn from video plays and referrals.

Search results for 89「W杯2026プレミア、ラ・リーガ
89「W杯2026プレミア、ラ・リーガ community
One keyword maps to one global community path.
Create community
People
Not Found
Tweets including 89「W杯2026プレミア、ラ・リーガ
‘28 RHP Henry Murphy (IL)- with 5Ks over 4 IP of relief. Ran the FB up to 89, sitting upper-80s w/ varying shape to BB in the 75-79 range. 69% strikes #WWBA# @PG_Illinois
a=(m,d=mag(k=2*cos(i*342),e=sin(i*271)*2)/1.6)=>point(k*(p=5+2*sin(d*8-t*3+m))+9/d*sin(k*2)+89*sin(c=d*d/9-t/8+m)+200,79*sin(c*2)+9/d*sin(e*2)+e*p+200) t=0,draw=$=>{t||createCanvas(w=400,w);background(9).stroke(w,116);for(t+=PI/60,i=1e4;i--;)a(i%4*5)}//#つぶやきProcessing#
Show more
0
18
1.2K
128
Forward to community
a=(y,d=mag(k=5*cos(y*9),e=y-35)/2.5)=>point((79+k*k+d*4)*sin(c=d/3-t)+200,89*sin(c/2)+7/d*sin(k*2)+y/44*k*e+d*3*sin(t*9-d*2+sin(t)/.6**3)+200) t=0,draw=$=>{t||createCanvas(w=400,w);background(9).stroke(w,66);for(t+=PI/240,i=1e4;i--;)a(i/254)}//#つぶやきProcessing#
Show more
a=(y,d=mag(k=5*cos(y*9),e=y/2-15)/3+sin(t)**4)=>point((79+k*k)*sin(c=d/2-t)+200,89*sin(c/2)+7/d*sin(k*2)+y/(y<6?7:99*sin(e/2)+1)*k*e+d**3/6*sin(t*9-d*2)+200) t=0,draw=$=>{t||createCanvas(w=400,w);background(9).stroke(w,66);for(t+=PI/240,i=1e4;i--;)a(i/254)}//#つぶやきProcessing#
Show more
Just wondering… who’s ordering the new Model Y L? 🙋🏻‍♂️ Tesla just launched the Model Y L (6-seater Long Wheelbase) in the US & Puerto Rico. Performance & Range • 0-60 mph in 4.4 seconds • 325 miles EPA range • Improved airflow, efficiency & overall range Seating • Front: Heated/ventilated seats + powered thigh cushion • 2nd row: Heated/ventilated captain’s chairs w/ powered armrests + one-touch fold • 3rd row: Heated seats w/ power recline, one-touch fold + child seat anchors Cargo & Practicality • 89 cu ft trunk space - with all 6 passengers still fits 28" + 20" suitcases each, frunk holds another 20", plus bikes/snowboards easy • Larger tailgate + bigger windows for great visibility & views from every seat Ride & Quiet • Upgraded acoustic glass + suspension for minimal road noise • Adaptive damping for smooth & stable ride • Staggered tires for enhanced grip • Improved airflow throughout Tech, Comfort & Safety • 16" front + 8" second-row touchscreens + 19-speaker immersive audio • Upgraded 50W wireless charging pads w/ active cooling + ports for all seats • Full safety optimized for 2nd & 3rd rows (seat belts + side airbags) • FSD Supervised + integrated Grok AI Congratulations to the @Tesla on the launch!
Show more
Will Fast Matrix Multiplication ever be practical? Strassen’s 1986 discovery of fast matrix multiplication (FMM) – asserting that the product of two 𝑛×𝑛 matrices can be computed in sub-cubic time 𝑛^𝜔 ∼ 𝑛²·⁸⁷ ≪ 𝑛³ – had a profound impact on theoretical computer science and algorithm design. Since then, mathematicians improved on Strassen’s algorithm, and some experts believe that, eventually, it will be shown that 𝜔 ≈ 2, which would mean that the time to compute AxB is essentially the time it takes to merely read the inputs: ~O(𝑛²) (!) Needless to say, such result would have a major impact on the AI compute age we’re entering… Unfortunately, FMM algorithms only work for enormous matrices--on the order of the number of atoms in the universe (“galactic algorithms" [1])--and it is currently hard to imagine them being practical on any imaginable hardware. Besides their asymptotic runtime, a core practical issue with FMM algorithms is that they all inherently rely on recursive divide-and-conquer, which creates memory and IO-bottlenecks, and is numerically unstable; This is likely the reason why the largest hardware manufacturers in the world are not developing chips for FMM. Even Strassen’s original algorithm, which gives nontrivial FLOP speedup for relatively small matrices, struggles to beat the sheer parallelism of naiive MatMul on GPUs or TPUs. Some interesting progress on practical FMM seems underway [2] and would be interesting to follow, but it remains to be seen whether divide-and-conquer can be implemented in both silicon and memory to deliver wall-clock speedups for realistic dimensions of matrices in LLMs. What is means for @prlnet. That’s the reason we designed the Pearl proof-of-work protocol (cuPOW) with the underlying baseline being “naiive” matrix multiplication O(𝑛³), which is what NVIDIA, AMD, Cerebras and all other AI hardware accelerators implement today. Nevertheless, it is important to stress that Pearl’s protocol doesn't rely on naiive MatMul remaining SoTA -- if FMM becomes practical some day, Pearl's protocol can easily adapt to the 𝑛^𝜔 baseline (since the next version of cuPoW will only verify the output AB). In fact, one of the intriguing aspect of @prlnet is that it creates incentives (for both humans and machines) to develop faster MatMul algorithms and hardware (as had happened in Bitcoin with SHA256). Of course, without proper modification, such breakthrough would break the security assumption of Pearl-GEMM, so such algorithmic breakthrough would better be public. FMM and FFT. Our recent paper [3] shows that it is possible to achieve fast matrix multiplication without using Strassen-like divide-and-conquer, using only the Fast Fourier Transform, which is omnipresent in countless industry-scale applications. This paper presents a simple algorithm running in 𝑂(𝑛²·⁸⁹) time, which only sums a few convolutions in 𝕫ₖᵐ, using FFT (see figure below for illustration of the algorithm). Despite being highly parallel (no recursion), this FFT algorithm for MatMul remains asymptotic, as it still requires many parallel repetitions on submatrices in order to obtain noticeable speedup over naiive MatMul (𝑛³). Whether FFT can lead to subcubic time MatMul for reasonably-sized matrices is a fascinating question! I believe FFTs are the most promising tool in this direction... [1] Lipton, Richard J., and Kenneth W. Regan. “David Johnson: Galactic Algorithms.” In People, Problems, and Proofs, 109–112. Springer, 2013. [2] Karstadt, Elaye, and Oded Schwartz. “Matrix Multiplication, a Little Faster.” Journal of the ACM 67, no. 1 (2020): 1:1–1:31. [3] Uffenheimer, Yahel, and Omri Weinstein. “Improved Sparse Recovery for Approximate Matrix Multiplication.” arXiv:2602.04386, 2026..
Show more
Digital Credit - Weekly Close (Sep. 18) $BTC broke $81K and digital credit issuers’ common equities ran with it, big time… 🚀 @Strategy is back to compounding... • $MSTR +17.5% w/w to $153.92, its best week since August 2026. Net mNAV rebuilt to 1.19x and the treasury now sits on $4.9B of unrealized gains. 😱 • $STRC $98.51 (-0.1% w/w), 12.2% effective yield. Another $139M repurchased announced earlier in the week; the buyback program is approaching $1B retired while $STRC climbs back to $100 @Strive hit a massive milestone... • $ASST +8.9% w/w to $30.09. Net mNAV 2.37x, and $BTC yield YTD is up to +49.5%. 🤯 • $SATA back above par at $100.01 (+0.3% w/w), 13.0% effective yield. The treasury crossed 25,000 $BTC, and what is left of the short pays 28.1%/yr with half a day to cover. Where digital credit closed, updated daily. 👇
Show more
89% OF AMERICANS SAY GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION IS REAL — PUBLIC TRUST HITS A BREAKING POINT A striking 89% of Americans believe corruption is present in the U.S. government, highlighting a deep and widespread crisis of public trust. The figure reflects growing concerns that political institutions may be influenced by self-interest, special interests, or unethical behavior rather than serving the public fairly. The perception of corruption can have serious consequences for democracy, weakening confidence in elected officials and government institutions. While believing corruption exists does not necessarily mean that 89% of Americans believe the entire government is corrupt, the statistic signals a powerful demand for greater transparency, accountability, and ethical leadership.
Show more
89% of Americans believe that there is corruption in the US government, per Gallup:
0
123
1.1K
131
Forward to community