Introducing Portfolio Tracker on Artemis. Most investors don’t know the answer to the only question that matters: Am I beating the market? Now you can. Connect any brokerage through Plaid, or any onchain wallet, and see your full portfolio in one place. - Crypto and equities. - Performance vs. SPY - Backtested returns - Concentration risk Then go one layer deeper. See your holdings next to analyst consensus price targets to understand what you own and where the Street thinks it could go. Your portfolio should not live across five apps. And performance should not be a mystery. See if you’re beating the market today:

In the Age of Artificial Intelligence, What Becomes of Human Need?Maslow’s hierarchy once traced an ascending arc of human aspiration: from the bare demand for survival, through the hunger for safety, the longing for connection, the craving for recognition, and finally to the luminous call of self-actualization.Yet the swift, almost vertiginous advance of AI promises a rupture in this ancient sequence. Robots of every form will proliferate; robots will design, assemble, and repair other robots, closing upon themselves in an autonomous loop of production. In principle, the entire chain of primary, secondary, and tertiary industry could be surrendered to these tireless agents. The material conditions of clothing, food, shelter, and movement would no longer require human labor. Humanity would at last stand outside the necessity of toiling for its own physical such a condition of radical material abundance, the lowest rung of Maslow’s ladder—the sheer demand for survival—would cease to be a problem at all. It would simply evaporate. What remains, however, lies beyond the reach of any algorithm or automaton: the need for safety, the need for genuine companionship, the need for esteem, and the need for in this new epoch, acquires a darker and more intimate face. It is no longer merely the threat of storm or predator, nor even the ordinary hazards of crime. It becomes the quiet dread that the instruments of governance—now armed with predictive surveillance, automated judgment, and total informational transparency—may be turned against the very citizens they claim to protect. The same intelligence that liberates matter may perfect the machinery of control.Nor can the social dimension of human life be outsourced. A humanoid robot, however perfectly mimetic, remains an artifact without interiority. It may simulate tenderness, but it cannot suffer with us, nor rejoice in our presence. Like the inflatable companion that answers only the most transient of appetites, it offers the appearance of relation while withholding its substance. We remain, irreducibly, creatures who require to be known by other minds that are themselves vulnerable, limited, and mortal.The need for esteem is equally intransigent. Respect is not a quantity that can be algorithmically dispensed; it is a recognition that must pass between beings who can, in principle, withhold it. A machine’s approval carries no moral weight, for it cannot choose otherwise. To be esteemed by silicon is to be esteemed by nothing at all.Finally, self-actualization—the highest and most mysterious demand—belongs to the order of spirit. It is the restless movement toward meaning, toward the integration of one’s existence into a larger horizon of significance. No system of optimization, however vast, can generate this movement from within itself. Meaning is not computed; it is lived, risked, and discovered in the fragile space between one finite consciousness and another.Thus, even as AI dissolves the ancient problem of material scarcity, it leaves untouched—and perhaps renders more urgent—the distinctly human questions that have always lain beyond the reach of tools: Who am I when I am no longer needed to produce? With whom do I stand when every transaction can be performed without another person? And what, finally, remains of me when the last material obstacle has been removed and only the soul is left to answer for itself?

THINGS MY PATIENTS TAUGHT ME — No. 6 HIS HEART HAD TO STOP BEFORE HE'D LISTEN TO IT He was fifty-two, and he'd been calling it indigestion for three days. He finally gave in when the pain climbed into his jaw in the middle of a board meeting. Minutes later he was on my table, and his heart stopped keeping time — it dissolved into that useless quivering we call V-fib, which is not a heartbeat at all. It's a muscle panicking. We shocked him. Nothing. We shocked him again. Through the glass I could see his wife holding her handbag against her chest like it was armor. Then a blip. Then another. He came back to us. Two stents propped open arteries he'd spent twenty years quietly closing, sixteen hours a day. Do you know what he asked for when he woke up in the ICU? Not am I okay. Not where's my wife. "My phone." I told him he had nearly died the day before. He told me I didn't understand — there was a deal that couldn't move without him. And for five days he ran his company from a hospital bed. Calls. Emails at three in the morning. His wife pulled me into the hallway and said, "I can't make him believe it happened." Then, the day before discharge, I walked in and found him staring out the window. Something had finally cracked. His assistant had sent flowers. The card said the office wasn't the same without him. But she'd also let slip, on the phone, that they'd already handed his biggest client to someone else. "Twenty years," he said. "Sixty-hour weeks. Anniversaries. My kid's games. I was the indispensable one." He looked at me. "They figured it out in five days." I've repeated that sentence to patients a hundred times since. They figured it out in five days. I sat down and told him the truth as I saw it: his heart didn't just have a blockage. It had staged a revolt against the way he was living. Six months later I barely recognized him walking in. Thirty pounds down. The permanent clench gone out of his shoulders. His wife told me he'd bought a kayak and was on the water at sunrise three mornings a week, and that his blood pressure was the lowest it had been in two decades. "I'd have died successful," he said. "But unfinished." Here's what he taught me, and I say it now to nearly every man who sits in my chair convinced he can't be spared: Your body is keeping a ledger. Every skipped meal, every stolen hour of sleep, every year you told yourself you'd rest after this next thing. It says nothing for a long time. And then one ordinary afternoon, without warning, it presents the bill. The heart speaks in a lot of languages. Pressure. Pain. Rhythm. And when nothing else gets through — silence. Our job isn't only to restart it. It's to help a man finally hear what it had been telling him for twenty years. So let me ask you what I asked him. What is the thing you keep promising yourself you'll do after — and who exactly are you counting on to still be there when after arrives? Blessings. P.S. He came back a year later with a photo on his phone he wanted me to see. Him in the kayak, sun barely up, water like glass. "Best conference room I've ever had," he said. I've thought about that more than the stents.

I'm a cardiologist. I've spent twenty years inside American healthcare, and I'll say the quiet part first: the system is indefensible. We spend roughly 18% of GDP on health care — the highest on earth — and have a lower life expectancy than countries spending half as much. Medical bills are a leading cause of bankruptcy. I have patients rationing insulin. I fight prior authorizations for medications that prevent heart attacks and imaging that finds cancer early. Anyone defending the status quo isn't practicing medicine. They're profiting from it. So why am I not for #MedicareForAll# ? Because I've watched what government-run health care actually does — from inside the exam room. Denial doesn't disappear. It changes uniforms. Insurers deny by prior authorization. Single-payer systems deny by waiting list. Canada's median wait from referral to treatment has run over 25 weeks. The UK's NHS backlog has hovered around 7 million. When you eliminate the price signal, you don't eliminate rationing — you just move it from a claims department to a queue, and queues are invisible. Nobody sues a waiting list. Medicare rates don't cover the cost of care. Hospitals lose money on Medicare and Medicaid and make it back on private insurance. Extend Medicare rates to everyone and that cross-subsidy vanishes overnight. Rural hospitals go first. Independent practices consolidate into hospital systems. The physicians I know would retire early, and the smartest students would go elsewhere. You can legislate coverage. You cannot legislate a doctor into existing. The fraud problem is already staggering. HHS loses an estimated $100 billion a year. Investigators found a hotel in Los Angeles where every room was a registered hospice with zero patients — just addresses billing Medicaid. If we can't police the programs we have, scaling to the entire country isn't reform. It's a bigger target. And the innovation math is real. Just this month: the first oral PCSK9 inhibitor approved, five Lp(a) drugs in late-stage trials, engineered immune cells that clear arterial inflammation. Americans overpay for drugs, and that overpayment subsidizes global R&D. Crush prices to European levels and something has to give. I'd rather fix the pricing abuse than gamble the pipeline. What I'd actually do, and none of it requires a $30 trillion bet: Real price transparency, enforced — you can't have a market where nobody sees prices. Break the employer link so insurance is portable and you don't lose coverage with your job. Expand HSAs and direct primary care — my colleagues doing it spend more time with patients and charge less. Break the PBM middlemen inflating drug costs. Site-neutral payments so a hospital can't charge triple for the same test. AI-driven fraud auditing — flag every provider billing 10 standard deviations above peers and audit them. Universal catastrophic coverage so nobody goes bankrupt from cancer. Now the honest counterpoint, because you deserve it: the strongest case for single-payer is administrative. Private insurers run 15-25% overhead. Traditional Medicare runs 2-3%. Most published economic analyses do project net savings. And every peer nation with universal coverage spends dramatically less than we do. Those aren't talking points — they're real findings that my side has to answer. I just don't believe the answer to a bureaucracy that denies your care is a bigger bureaucracy that can't be sued. Fix the prices. Fix the fraud. Cover the catastrophes. Don't hand the whole thing to the same people who couldn't notice 29 hospices in one hotel.

I find most meetings to be a waste. But there’s one each quarter I genuinely look forward to: leadership offsite. It’s a meeting that costs the business tens of thousands of dollars in time, but could make the company tens of millions in revenue. After each offsite, I reflect on what I learned/observed. Here’s the list from yesterday’s Q2 offsite: 1) Scarcity truly is the best pressure cooker for creativity and ruthless prioritization. Going through the intellectual gauntlet as we tried to stretch a dollar was both painful and satisfying once we came out the other side. No matter how big and flush with cash the company gets I want us to always balance an abundance mindset (where cash is viewed as an offensive weapon) with the bootstrappers mentality (where every unit of value whether time or money is treated like a precious metal) 2) Wandering is a really unnatural feeling for humans and we experienced that during the middle part of the offsite. The top of the meeting cleanly flowed through pre-reads, VTO, and IDS/rock lists, but then we hit the big ugly problem (how the fuck do we hire so many people) and the process of solving it felt messy and meandering at times. I think that’s exactly how it should feel. The movies romanticize strokes of genius, but that's not how life works. The hardest questions to answer and hardest problems to solve require the discomfort of not knowing where you're headed and the self-belief to stay the course. 3) Sharp writing has a higher premium than ever before. Friction is one of the greatest gifts that AI took away from writing. We used to have to earn each word we wrote. It was painful but forced intention and clear thinking. And the preread docs we all created, even if ai-assisted, reminded me how artificially creating friction in your writing in a post-AI world is necessary to do your best work. 4) “Am I dumb?” There were times during the meeting where I was listening to the group reason through an idea or decision and my first reaction was embarrassment. Am I not smart enough to keep up? Are they just smarter than me? Old Alex wouldn't have been able to handle it. But once I separated stimulus from response, I thought “what an incredible gift it is to be surrounded by such smart and generative people who I get to learn from each day.” Nothing feels more assuring as co-founder than going into proverbial battle with people who are the absolute best at what they do. 5) We spent 8 hours baking in a 8x15 conference room together. But at no point did I dread being in that meeting with you. In fact, for those 8 hours there's nowhere I would have rather been. It has little to do with what was discussed and how you made me feel. We felt like a unit. We laughed a ton. We got serious, we got silly, we got sappy. I'll remember those interactions and those emotions far longer than I'll remember the way in which we divvied up opex. 6) That was our most costly meeting of the quarter. Literally cost the business thousands. But the ROI on the meeting will literally be tens of millions of dollars. It's why being well prepped for it was so important. It's why keeping it on track was so important. And it's why viewing the meeting as a starting point for all of the work to be done is so important. We were the architectural team finalizing the blueprint today and now the work begins. Foundation to be laid. Support beams to be added. That's the extent of my home construction knowledge. 7) What stands between us and hitting every one of the goals we set during the meeting? It's actually quite simple, just not easy to execute. It's an OODA (observe-orient-decide-act) loop that each of us and each of our teammates keeps spinning throughout the quarter. And anytime we get off track, the loop has become imbalanced. Maybe we didn't observe the situation properly or gather all the necessary info. Or perhaps we haven't oriented the current context to the ultimate goal. It could be that we made the wrong decision or didn't make a necessary decision at all. And similarly we may have acted poorly or suffered from inaction. Let’s have a banner Q3.

From someone who teaches AP US History: If you are confused as to why so many Americans are defending the confederate flag, monuments, and statues right now, I put together a quick Q&A, with questions from a hypothetical person with misconceptions and answers from my perspective as an AP U.S. History Teacher: Q: What did the Confederacy stand for? A: Rather than interpreting, let's go directly to the words of the Confederacy's Vice President, Alexander Stephens. In his "Cornerstone Speech" on March 21, 1861, he stated "The Constitution... rested upon the equality of races. This was an error. Our new government is founded upon exactly the opposite idea; its foundations are laid, its corner-stone rests, upon the great truth that the negro is not equal to the white man; that slavery subordination to the superior race is his natural and normal condition. This, our new government, is the first, in the history of the world, based upon this great physical, philosophical, and moral truth." Q: But people keep saying heritage, not hate! They think the purpose of the flags and monuments are to honor confederate soldiers, right? A: The vast majority of confederate flags flying over government buildings in the south were first put up in the 1960's during the Civil Rights Movement. So for the first hundred years after the Civil War ended, while relatives of those who fought in it were still alive, the confederate flag wasn't much of a symbol at all. But when Martin Luther King, Jr. and John Lewis were marching on Washington to get the Civil Rights Act (1964) and Voting Rights Act (1965) passed, leaders in the south felt compelled to fly confederate flags and put up monuments to honor people who had no living family members and had fought in a war that ended a century ago. Their purpose in doing this was to exhibit their displeasure with black people fighting for basic human rights that were guaranteed to them in the 14th and 15th Amendments but being withheld by racist policies and practices. Q: But if we take down confederate statues and monuments, how will we teach about and remember the past? A: Monuments and statues pose little educational relevance, whereas museums, the rightful place for Confederate paraphernalia, can provide more educational opportunities for citizens to learn about our country's history. The Civil War is important to learn about, and will always loom large in social studies curriculum. Removing monuments from public places and putting them in museums also allows us to avoid celebrating and honoring people who believed that tens of millions of black Americans should be legal property. Q: But what if the Confederate flag symbol means something different to me? A: Individuals aren't able to change the meaning of symbols that have been defined by history. When I hang a Bucs flag outside my house, to me, the Bucs might represent the best team in the NFL, but to the outside world, they represent an awful NFL team, since they haven't won a playoff game in 18 years. I can't change that meaning for everyone who drives by my house because it has been established for the whole world to see. If a Confederate flag stands for generic rebellion or southern pride to you, your personal interpretation forfeits any meaning once you display it publicly, as its meaning takes on the meaning it earned when a failed regime killed hundreds of thousands of Americans in an attempt to destroy America and keep black people enslaved forever. Q: But my uncle posted a meme that said the Civil War/Confederacy was about state's rights and not slavery? A: "A state's right to what?" - John Green Q: Everyone is offended about everything these days. Should we take everything down that offends anyone? A: The Confederacy literally existed to go against the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, and the idea that black people are human beings that deserve to live freely. If that doesn't upset or offend you, you are un-American. Q: Taking these down goes against the First Amendment and freedom of speech, right? A: No. Anyone can do whatever they want on their private property, on their social media, etc. Taking these down in public, or having private corporations like NASCAR ban them on their properties, has literally nothing to do with the Bill of Rights. Q: How can people claim to be patriotic while supporting a flag that stood for a group of insurgent failures who tried to permanently destroy America and killed 300,000 Americans in the process? A: No clue. Q: So if I made a confederate flag my profile picture, or put a confederate bumper sticker on my car, what am I declaring to my friends, family, and the world? A: That you support the Confederacy. To recap, the Confederacy stands for: slavery, white supremacy, treason, failure, and a desire to permanently destroy Selective history as it supports white supremacy. It’s no accident that: You learned about Helen Keller instead of W.E.B, DuBois You learned about the Watts and L.A. Riots, but not Tulsa or Wilmington. You learned that George Washington’s dentures were made from wood, rather than the teeth from slaves. You learned about black ghettos, but not about Black Wall Street. You learned about the New Deal, but not “red lining.” You learned about Tommie Smith’s fist in the air at the 1968 Olympics, but not that he was sent home the next day and stripped of his medals. You learned about “black crime,” but white criminals were never lumped together and discussed in terms of their race. You learned about “states rights” as the cause of the Civil War, but not that slavery was mentioned 80 times in the articles of secession. Privilege is having history rewritten so that you don’t have to acknowledge uncomfortable facts. Racism is perpetuated by people who refuse to learn or acknowledge this reality. You have a choice. - Jim Golden