I have a proof, I helped Tanya and Caties run Twitter accounts, and Tanya in return wanted to develop YouTube for me, she was sincere then That's what she created for me:

We are excited to announce our collaboration with @quipnetwork 🤝 Quip Network is building a Proof of Useful Work (PoUW) blockchain powered by distributed quantum computing and post-quantum security. Eigen Key is a limited collection of 1,000 NFTs that grants holders priority access to mint Rare Quantum Echoes NFTs. Join Our Discord !

Most teams wait months to validate new contact center tech. Equiniti stood up a proof of concept with Amazon Connect Customer almost immediately. Learn more.

For most of blockchain's history, building anything real meant picking a side. Want serious computation? A year of trading history, an off-chain data feed, a model? 🖥️ You run it on your own server and ask users to trust the output. Want full trustlessness? ⛓️ You keep everything on-chain and accept that your app stays basic, because every node re-runs every step and nobody can afford much. Verifiable compute quietly removes that choice. Run the heavy work wherever you want, at full power, and hand back a proof it was done correctly. Anyone can check that proof in milliseconds and trust the result completely. That's the shift we're building for: a world where serious computation and "you don't have to trust me" finally hold at the same time. Learn more 👇

The world's first fully autonomous umbrella. Wherever Mohammed went in the run, a cloud always covered him overhead. Muslims can now claim it as a proof that inventions come from the Quran and Hathis. It's just only non-Muslims can do that. Let me see the setup and storage. Where do you keep it? Carry a back pack just to hold your “umbrella”? It docks on the side of your house above your door, can recognize you from your bald spot, and launches if the weather dictates. If it just covers you between the front door and the car, it will feel used and get angry.

Axiom Math's Carina Hong on why verification isn't about catching mistakes, it's how you drive the cost of a proof to zero: "Formal verification is going to make your life slightly better if you're facing a proof with one million lines. Remember the Erdős unit distance problem, the chain of thought being generated? There are actual mathematicians trying to follow it step by step and scrutinize it. That seems very difficult if you're not in that very niche domain of discrete geometry intersecting with algebraic number theory." "But if you have a Lean proof accompanying it, you can just run it. And running the Lean proof gives you that provable guarantee that this proof is sound." "I have a hot take. People think Lean is this library built on the existing Mathlib. I think it's going to grow significantly. A lot of the hurdles where Lean is difficult is that the basic definitions of some mathematical fields are just not in the library." "My hot take is the scaling law, if you go down the formal mathematics path, is going to be a lot steeper than informal mathematics. So it's not just for verification, for trust, it's also for performance, it's also for optimal generation." "Verification is not like insurance. It's not something where, oh, we want to make sure there's no flaw. That's great, but it also helps you generate mathematics, both proofs and conjectures and theories, a lot better." "So imagine the cost of proof goes to zero. Then you can massage the problem statements, and even if it's an open problem, a lot more easily, flexibly, and adaptively." @CarinaLHong @axiommathai

Some networks are built on anonymity. The Stellar network is built on transparency. The Stellar network operates on a Proof-of-Agreement consensus model, requiring that validators be trusted by others in the network, rather than simply anyone with funds.