And the third play I want to talk about today is $RAYCAT A lot of you have been asking me about this one after its recent run, especially one question : Is the current dip actually a good entry? I looked deeper into it, and before talking about entry, I think we first need to understand what we're actually betting on here $RAYCAT is not an official Raydium token, and it’s also not the leader of the current cat meta The thesis, in my view, sits at the intersection of three narratives : Cat meta + $RAY/Raydium + StonkFun dividend meta 1. The idea is simple: hold the cat, earn RAY What makes $RAYCAT different from a pure cat meme is the reward mechanics Every buy, sell, or transfer of $RAYCAT is taxed. Most of that fee is converted into RAY and distributed back to holders based on how much $RAYCAT they hold No staking, no locking, and no manual claiming Simple : More volume => more fees => more RAY rewards for holders StonkFun also has a mechanism that uses part of its platform revenue to buy back and burn $RAYCAT. That is a separate flow, so don’t confuse it with the tax used for holder rewards One practical detail: transferring tokens between wallets can still be taxed, and very small wallets may not meet the minimum threshold to receive rewards So yes, I like the mechanics, but don’t look at a high APR and assume it’s fixed yield The APR looks high because volume is high If volume drops, rewards drop with it For me, if you’re tracking this play : Watch volume first, APR second 2. But $RAYCAT didn’t create this meta To understand why $RAYCAT ran, you first need to look at $ZCAT $ZCAT was the one that proved the template : Hold a meme => earn a “real” token. $ZCAT rewards holders in ZEC, and after its massive run, the market started copying the same mechanics into other tokens : RAYCAT => RAY JUPCAT => JUP LEVERCAT => LEVER So if we’re being accurate, $RAYCAT is a beta of the $ZCAT thesis, not the originator of the narrative But that’s how meme markets work The leader creates the meta first, then liquidity starts rotating into smaller betas And among those betas, I think $RAYCAT has pretty clear positioning 3. Because it picked the right token : RAY This is where it gets interesting for me Ray Cat Paired with RAY Rewards paid in RAY Launched through StonkFun while the StonkFun/Raydium narrative already has attention So buying $RAYCAT isn’t really just betting on another cat You’re effectively betting on three things at once : Cat meta staying alive + RAY staying strong + StonkFun continuing to generate volume That’s why I see $RAYCAT as something like : A cheaper beta of $ZCAT + an option on RAY If RAY keeps running and liquidity stays active around StonkFun, I think $RAYCAT is one of the easiest betas for the market to rotate back into within this branch of the meta 4. But there’s one narrative I think people are pushing too far The whole “official Raydium cat” story Raydium has posted cat memes, and the community started connecting them to $RAYCAT It’s obviously a very easy narrative to FOMO into But so far, I haven’t seen Raydium officially mention the $RAYCAT ticker or post the actual CA confirming that this is their token or mascot $RAYCAT itself is also not an official Raydium product So separate these two things : Raydium posting cats = fact That cat being $RAYCAT = community narrative If Raydium eventually mentions the actual ticker or CA, that could become a very strong catalyst But for now, I treat it as a potential catalyst, not something I’d buy based on the assumption that “Raydium will eventually tweet it” 5. The problem is that most of the easy catalysts have already happened This is why I’m not that interested in chasing the current dip $RAYCAT has already been verified/listed on Fomo Moonshot has verified it too RAY already had a strong move The cat meta has already run StonkFun already has attention And the chart has reflected all of that pretty clearly $RAYCAT ran from around $2M to nearly $15M MC, then wicked back down hard So this is no longer a pre-pump play It’s an after-pump play currently going through a reset For another strong leg, I think it needs fresh fuel Maybe RAY breaks out again Maybe StonkFun volume expands further Maybe $ZCAT starts a second leg and pulls the smaller satellites with it Or the strongest catalyst would obviously be Raydium actually acknowledging $RAYCAT itself Without something new, I’d lean more toward the chart needing time to reset rather than immediately printing another ATH 6. And don’t forget that $ZCAT is still the leader Looking at the broader cat meta, $ZCAT is still clearly ahead It has the first-mover advantage, a much larger market cap, and most importantly, it has already proven the narrative $RAYCAT is still more of a satellite play Simply put : $ZCAT is the leader of the meta $RAYCAT is the RAY beta If $ZCAT starts another leg, liquidity can easily rotate down into smaller betas like $RAYCAT But the opposite is also true When the leader gets weak, satellites usually get hit harder So don’t look at $ZCAT around ~$100M and $RAYCAT around ~$8M and simply think : “It still has another 10–12x just to catch ZCAT” Meme markets don’t price things that easily 7. This is also why the mechanics are both its biggest strength and its biggest risk The $RAYCAT flywheel looks great when the market is hot : Volume => tax => RAY rewards => incentive to hold => attention => more volume But when the market turns, that same flywheel can reverse : Attention drops => volume drops => rewards drop => incentive to hold drops So at the end of the day, the real engine is still volume If price corrects but volume remains healthy, RAY stays strong, and StonkFun keeps getting attention, I’m not too worried But if the chart starts bleeding while volume dies at the same time, then a pretty APR number doesn’t mean much This is still a meme And cat metas rotate extremely fast Today the market likes $RAYCAT. Tomorrow, another “CAT + reward token” can appear and steal all the attention 8. So is the current dip worth buying? This is the main question At around $8M MC, personally, I’m not chasing it Not because the thesis is bad It simply just ran from ~$2M to ~$15M before correcting back here. To me, ~$8M still feels stuck somewhere between the expansion and the actual reset zone If I wanted to bet on it, I’d start paying attention around $5–6M The $4–5M area becomes much more interesting if RAY is still strong, StonkFun is still generating volume, and the cat meta hasn’t died If the market actually gives us around $3M while the entire thesis remains intact, that’s where I’d see a much better margin of safety for a gamble On the other hand, if it loses the ~$2M area completely, then the structure of this current wave is basically broken for me Meme is meme No matter how good the narrative is, you still need an invalidation 9. Final thoughts I actually like $RAYCAT Not simply because it’s another cat, but because it sits at the intersection of several narratives that make sense : $ZCAT dividend meta + RAY + Raydium + StonkFun The $RAY reward mechanics also give it more reason to be interesting than most of the other cat clones But I still see it as a beta, not the leader. More importantly, most of the easy catalysts have already been priced in through that move from ~$2M to nearly ~$15M For another leg, I want to see volume remain strong or a fresh catalyst appear So for the question I keep getting : Is the ~$8M dip worth buying? For me, there’s no need to rush I like $RAYCAT, but at ~$8M, I don’t like the price yet CFNRDaxFcvRwRSNnA5cHrCCr6AHhk9dNkHWpRUjNupFL

And the second token I want to talk about today is $CATGPT This is one of the tokens I think is worth researching on Robinhood Chain right now But first, we need to get one thing straight : $CATGPT is not a ChatGPT token, and it is not OpenAI stock Its thesis sits at the intersection of three narratives currently getting attention : Cat meta + OpenAI/ChatGPT + stock/pre-IPO paired memes And what interests me most isn't the $CATGPT name itself, but where it sits within the LONG ecosystem 1. What are you actually betting on with $CATGPT? Robinhood Chain was originally built around tokenized stocks/RWAs, but memes have become one of the biggest drivers of volume on the chain The meta has also evolved pretty clearly: Pure memes like $CASHCAT => memes paired with listed stocks => memes paired with Pre-IPO narratives $CATGPT sits in the third category It's paired directly with OPENAIx1L, a tokenized long exposure to OpenAI within the LONG/Lighter ecosystem The flow is pretty simple : OpenAI hasn't IPO'd yet => LONG creates OPENAIx1L to give the market exposure to the OpenAI narrative => $CATGPT pairs with OPENAIx1L and becomes the meme layer pulling retail attention into the same narrative So I don't see $CATGPT as simply "a GPT cat" I see it more as a distribution/attention layer for the long OpenAI onchain narrative 2. Why is $CATGPT positioned pretty well right now? The timing is what I like $CATGPT appeared almost exactly when LONG started opening up the OpenAI/Anthropic Pre-IPO narrative, and attention on the OpenAI side currently seems fairly concentrated around it That gives $CATGPT a kind of first-mover attention If LONG keeps pushing OpenAI pairs, expands TVL, and turns Pre-IPO into a real meta, the market will probably need a ticker that represents that narrative Right now, $CATGPT has a chance to take that slot But I want to emphasize: it has the opportunity, it hasn't proven itself yet. The token is still very new 3. $AI/NVDA is a useful benchmark Anyone who's been trading this ecosystem probably knows $AI $AI went from a small cap to hundreds of millions, but it didn't run simply because it was paired with NVDA It had a memorable ticker, a powerful NVDA narrative, better liquidity, and most importantly, enough time for the market to recognize it as one of the representative tokens of the ecosystem $CATGPT currently only has the right place + the right timing It doesn't yet have the same history, liquidity depth, or holder base as $AI So I wouldn't use this logic : $AI reached hundreds of millions => therefore $CATGPT should do the same What $AI actually proved is : LONG's meme + stock pair model can produce a major runner. Now $CATGPT is testing a similar model with the OpenAI Pre-IPO narrative Whether it becomes the next runner is something the market still needs time to answer 4. The chart looks okay, but I wouldn't call the structure strong yet $CATGPT price-discovered to around $19–20M, dumped to $8–9M, bounced back to $15–16M, and is now trading around $11–12M I wouldn't call this accumulation yet It looks more like temporary equilibrium after price discovery The positive side is that buyers have continued absorbing dips, and the token hasn't simply bled straight back to the lows But at the same time, the market hasn't established a clear base either $11–12M is currently in the middle of the range. It's not the bottom, but it's not a breakout either Buyers are returning, but I wouldn't call them particularly strong yet. Some early wallets have also started distributing, so supply appears to be rotating from early buyers into a new holder base If new holders continue absorbing that supply, the structure can gradually improve But if volume declines while holder growth stalls, future bounces could easily become exit liquidity 5. Liquidity is actually what concerns me more The main issue isn't necessarily the $CATGPT side. It's the OPENAIx1L leg The OpenAI vault currently has a cap of around $600K, while the meme itself has already reached valuations in the tens of millions That creates a pretty significant gap between: meme valuation <=> depth of the underlying narrative When money flows in, this structure can amplify upside very quickly But when sell pressure arrives, it can amplify the downside just as fast Simply put : The meme side of the pool looks relatively deep. OPENAIx1L is the thinner leg That's why I don't see OPENAIx1L as a hard "floor" for $CATGPT On the other hand, if LONG raises the cap, grows TVL, and adds more liquidity to the OpenAI side, that would be one of the strongest catalysts for the thesis 6. The mechanics also need to be understood correctly The $CATGPT contract itself is pretty simple : ~1B supply, 0% tax, almost 0 dev holdings, renounced, with no staking, reflections, or rights to claim OpenAI equity Mechanisms such as fees, community vaults, burns, and counter-dump features mainly belong to the LONG/pool mechanics, not to $CATGPT itself More importantly : Holding $CATGPT does not mean you own OpenAI or receive OpenAI shares OPENAIx1L isn't OpenAI equity either. It's a form of tokenized long exposure So ultimately, the value of $CATGPT still depends on four things : Attention + ecosystem positioning + liquidity + narrative 7. What would make me more bullish? There are four things I want to see LONG continues pushing $CATGPT as a representative pair Holder count continues growing after the launch hype cools down OPENAIx1L gets a higher cap and real liquidity growth And finally, the chart establishes a base after correction instead of continuously printing lower highs If these happen together, I think the thesis could shift from an event trade into something worth holding a little longer 8. What are the risks? The biggest risk is that both legs can move against you $CATGPT can lose attention while OPENAIx1L/NAV weakens the other side of the pool. Being paired with an OpenAI-related asset does not create a hard floor Second, attention isn't exclusive The same vault already has $FROGE, $GPT, $OPENAITOKEN... and more tokens can always appear $CATGPT only deserves its premium as long as it remains the narrative leader There's also the weekend/after-hours issue: memes trade 24/7, while the Pre-IPO underlying doesn't have the same kind of clean real-time price discovery, so dislocations can become larger And finally, the token is still extremely new A few good launch days aren't enough to prove holder quality or whether it can survive once attention starts rotating elsewhere 9. My plan At $11–12M, I'm not chasing We're currently sitting around the middle of the post-price-discovery range, so I don't think the risk/reward is particularly attractive If I want to bet on it : > $8–9M: shallow dip. Only interesting if volume and holder growth remain healthy > $5–6.5M: this is where the risk/reward starts becoming more interesting to me if the LONG + OpenAI thesis remains intact > $3–4M: only worth gambling on if $CATGPT still holds the representative slot and LONG continues pushing OpenAI But if volume collapses, holder growth stalls, top wallets start distributing heavily, OPENAIx1L liquidity gets clearly pulled, or attention rotates into another token, then I'll drop the dip-buying plan entirely A cheaper price doesn't automatically mean a better entry 10. Conclusion What I like about $CATGPT isn't the fact that it has ChatGPT in its name It's sitting right at the intersection of : Cat meta + OpenAI + Pre-IPO + LONG ecosystem That's a strong narrative position, but a strong position doesn't automatically mean a strong token Underlying liquidity is still thin, the holder base hasn't been stress-tested, and the market is already pricing in a lot of expectations for such a new token To me, $CATGPT currently looks more like an option on LONG turning OpenAI Pre-IPO into the next meta than something I'd hold for fundamentals If LONG keeps pushing, OPENAIx1L gains more depth, and $CATGPT maintains the #1# attention slot, I think there could still be meaningful upside But at $11–12M, I don't think there's any reason to FOMO I like the thesis. I just don't like the entry yet 0xd6FDE6a3Fc6Ab2d83b2BE58383944CA1baDe1E18

Continuing with the highcap series I’m watching today The first one is $BATON I previously wrote my thesis and called $BATON in the channel at around $5M MC. Since then, it ran to nearly $18M and the structure is still holding up pretty well A lot of you are still asking about it, so here’s a quick update: how much of the original thesis has been validated, and what’s left to bet on from here? 1. The $BATON narrative First, let’s make one thing clear: $BATON is not an official token and it doesn’t have any real utility of its own. It’s still a community memecoin But the lore behind it has a real origin Baton Corporation Ltd is the name associated with the company behind the development of The Baton name also existed back in the Baton Finance days before the team pivoted into building So the narrative is pretty straightforward : Baton Finance => Baton Corporation => => $BATON That means the lore wasn’t completely made up by the community However, a real connection in the lore does not mean official endorsement. So far, I haven’t seen any evidence that Alon, or Baton Corporation officially backs this token 2. The catalyst I’m actually betting on is Custom Pairs $BATON appeared right as started pushing Custom Pairs, expanding the ability to pair tokens with different types of assets. The stock/tokenized asset narrative is the part I’m particularly interested in And $BATON is paired directly with $PUMP Raydium already has StonkFun, while Robinhood Chain has shown that the stock meta can attract serious liquidity and attention If wants to compete for this narrative, I don’t think having the feature alone is enough They need runners And from what I’m tracking right now, $BATON is still leading the Custom meta on That’s one of the biggest reasons my thesis hasn’t changed 3. I see $BATON as an attention bet My thesis is actually pretty simple : pushes Custom Pairs → more attention flows into the ecosystem → $PUMP gets more attention → Custom Pair tokens attract more liquidity → the market looks for a runner → $BATON has the timing + lore to capture that attention So I don’t see $BATON as simply a meme using the Baton Corporation name I see it as an attention bet on the ecosystem The harder Custom Pairs gets pushed, the more opportunities $PUMP and the strongest runners around that narrative have to capture liquidity 4. There have been many $BATONs, but the market is choosing this one There have actually been quite a few versions of $BATON launched before Most of them pumped for a while and quickly lost attention This one has been different So far, this is the longest-lasting $BATON and the one that has held attention the best from what I’ve seen With memes, I don’t really care which one launched first Narratives can be copied. Names can be copied. Lore can be copied But liquidity, mindshare, and the ability to survive multiple corrections are much harder to copy Eventually, the market usually picks only a few runners to concentrate liquidity into Right now, this version is winning that battle 5. Price action is also validating the thesis When I called it around $5M, most of the thesis was still just an expectation Since then, $BATON has gone through multiple corrections, rebuilt its structure, reclaimed the $5–8M range, broke $10M, and then expanded to nearly $18M This is the kind of meme structure I like: pump => reset => absorption => reclaim => expansion What matters isn’t how many Xs it has done What matters is that buyers are still absorbing supply after each correction and the attention hasn’t disappeared That’s why I think the market has validated a good part of the original thesis 6. From here, it needs new catalysts At $5M, I was betting that the market hadn’t priced the narrative yet After a move to nearly $18M, part of that story is clearly already priced in From here, I’m watching three things : continues pushing Custom Pairs $BATON continues holding its position as the leader And the biggest catalyst : or Alon directly acknowledges $BATON The last one hasn’t happened yet If we eventually get direct interaction from or Alon, I think the narrative could get repriced much higher But I’m not going to bet as if that’s guaranteed to happen 7. Risks The biggest risk is still attention $BATON has no product or revenue of its own and there is no official endorsement If the Custom meta cools down, another runner takes the liquidity, or $BATON loses its position as the leader, the thesis can weaken very quickly There’s also competition risk. Just because this is currently the strongest version doesn’t mean the market will choose it forever Another risk worth mentioning is the legal risk surrounding Baton Corporation/Pump.fun Baton Corporation is still involved in litigation in the US. Some claims have been dismissed, while part of the RICO claims have been allowed to proceed. That does not mean a court has found or its founders guilty of wrongdoing, but it remains an event risk worth monitoring The Baton connection is what makes the narrative powerful, but if Baton/Pump.fun faces a materially negative legal development, that same connection could become a downside catalyst And remember: $BATON is just a community meme. It is not equity or an official token of Baton Corporation/Pump.fun Lore can create attention, but lore does not create a price floor If liquidity, mindshare, or structure changes, my thesis will change too 8. My plan Even though I’m still bullish on the thesis, I don’t think you guys should FOMO at the current price $BATON has already moved from my ~$5M call to nearly $18M. The risk/reward is obviously very different now If you don’t have a position but still want to bet on the narrative, personally I’d wait for a correction toward around $11M MC and then watch how buyers and the structure react Entering here could easily make you exit liquidity for people who got in much lower and are taking profits For those who entered with me around the lower levels, I think it makes sense to keep part of the position to bet on the next catalyst, but don’t forget to manage your profits 9. Conclusion The thesis from $5M has been validated pretty well so far : The lore has a real origin The timing matched Custom Pairs It’s paired directly with $PUMP It has survived longer than the other $BATON versions The price structure remains strong And most importantly, it’s still leading the Custom meta on So I’m still bullish on the thesis But being bullish on a token doesn’t mean being bullish on every entry At these levels, I’m holding my existing position and not chasing If we correct toward $11M and the structure remains healthy, I’ll consider betting more At $5M, I was betting on the narrative From here, I’m betting on $BATON maintaining its position as the leader If it loses that leadership, loses attention, or the structure breaks down, I’ll reassess Hg5Ja55T5wESq4vyFoiVCMeHXtGyVA69X2UHq8hgpump

Arc Mainnet launches September 16. Arc is an open blockchain network being built for the world’s financial markets, real-time money movement, and agentic economic activity. Arc’s founding validator cohort includes @BlackRock, @The_DTCC, @galaxyhq, @GlobalPayInc, @Mastercard, @MoneyGram, @ICE_Markets, SBI, @StanChart, Sumitomo Corporation, and @Visa. This is a different model for onchain infrastructure: a network secured by the institutions building on it. Arc is already gaining traction across major institutions. @BlackRock, @BNYglobal, @The_DTCC, and @StanChart are each exploring integrations spanning tokenized asset settlement, custody, stablecoin access, FX, and repo infrastructure. Arc is also expected to launch with a broad ecosystem across liquidity, payments, access, and infrastructure with more to come. Liquidity / DeFi: @aave, @aeroxyz, @FalconXGlobal, @galaxyhq, @GSR_io, @keyrock, @Morpho, @nonco_otc, @Uniswap, @OfficialXFX Payments: @raincards, @ThunesPayments, @wirexapp Major Exchanges and Wallet Providers: @BinanceWallet, @chainlink, @FireblocksHQ, @krakenfx, @Ledger, @MetaMask, @Official_Upbit, @Uniswap Participants building on Arc experience an open platform powering the world's financial markets, real-time money movement, and agentic economic activity. Whether you're launching a financial application, integrating stablecoin flows, or experimenting with new, AI-powered economic models, Arc gives you the tools to build what isn’t possible anywhere else. Arc Mainnet launches September 16.

robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 is one of the tokens I’ve been asked about the most today It ran from a small cap to over $50M MC, before correcting back to around $25–30M The narrative is genuinely interesting, but this move didn’t happen because of one single factor Let’s break down what’s actually behind robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 1. It all started with real research The first thing I like about robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 is simple : The narrative existed before the token On September 3, Google Research, HHMI Janelia, Cambridge, and other research groups published the connectome of the adult male fruit fly’s central nervous system The original scientific dataset contains roughly 166K neurons and ~125M synapses This is a real scientific milestone, not something the robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 team made up to create lore for a memecoin There’s one detail worth clarifying because CT has been mixing this up The simulation on the robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 site doesn’t run the entire ~125M synapses directly. After filtering out weaker connections with fewer than 3 synapses, the graph being used contains roughly 10.2M connections So the distinction is : ~125M synapses = the original scientific dataset ~10.2M connections = the filtered graph used in the simulation Things got more interesting after the research became public Developers started experimenting with the fly connectome in environments like Minecraft, Doom, Mario, etc A fairly niche neuroscience topic suddenly became an internet meme that anyone could understand : “We mapped the wiring of a fly brain. What happens if we put it inside a computer and let it play games?” And robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 appeared right as this narrative started going viral 2. But what does a “fly brain living on the internet” actually mean? This is something I think people need to understand properly before getting bullish robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 is not a conscious fly living onchain, and it’s not an LLM-based AI Agent that can think for itself, read X, and decide what to trade A connectome is basically a wiring diagram of the nervous system The project uses that wiring to simulate neural activity, then maps different inputs and outputs into interactions with an environment For example, visual input from a browser can be converted into stimuli for the simulation, while certain descending neurons can be mapped to actions like moving forward, backward, left, right, or clicking Put simply : It doesn’t “read” a website the way we do. It reacts to inputs through a neural model built from a real connectome Some parts still require human/script assistance So if the narrative becomes : “A living fly brain is independently trading and launching memecoins” I think that goes further than what the project is actually doing But I don’t think that makes the idea less interesting If anything, the differentiator here is the real biological wiring The market already has countless projects taking an LLM, attaching a wallet to it, and calling it an AI Agent A simulation built around a real connectome naturally creates much more curiosity 3. From a science experiment to a stock meme This is where the crypto side gets interesting robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 was launched on Robinhood Chain through Pons and paired with GOOGL I think the way the narrative is packaged is pretty smart Google Research is directly connected to the original scientific story Robinhood Chain already has a stock/tokenized-stock meta And Pons allows memes to be paired with stock-linked assets So everything connects pretty naturally : Google => Fly Brain => GOOGL => Robinhood Chain => Stock Meme That makes robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 more than just another “fly meme” It sits right at the intersection of science, neuroscience/AI attention, internet memes, the stock meta, and Robinhood Chain I think that’s one of the main reasons it was able to expand so quickly 4. Where is all the attention coming from? This is where I think the narrative is quite different from a typical memecoin The attention is basically forming across three layers The first is science/mainstream The research is real, and names like Google Research, Janelia, and Cambridge are genuinely behind the original scientific work The biggest account pushing the underlying research that I found was @NewsFromGoogle, whose MaleCNS post reached around 13M views based on the data I checked Polymarket also posted about the milestone of mapping more than 166K neurons But this distinction matters : Google and Polymarket are talking about the research. They are not endorsing robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 I only see this as evidence that the underlying narrative has grown beyond the neuroscience community The second layer is internet virality Accounts like @evnschlr, @jbohnslav, @nftecchie_ and @sainimatic have posted fly-brain-related experiments/content that reached millions of views They are not shilling the token either But they are doing something important: repeatedly putting the “fly brain” concept back onto people’s timelines The final layer is crypto attention One major catalyst was Marc Andreessen following the project’s official account That’s obviously a meaningful signal for a new meme, but again, it needs to be framed correctly : pmarca followed the account. He did not tweet the ticker or endorse the token robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 has also started appearing on the timelines of crypto accounts such as @CryptoGorilla, @fuelkek, along with Chinese CT accounts and traders within the Robinhood ecosystem I don’t really care who bought early or how much anyone made What matters to me is that attention from the broader fly-brain narrative has started being funneled toward the actual robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 ticker The flow looks pretty clean : Science creates the narrative => the internet turns it into viral content => crypto starts capturing that attention into a ticker Google doesn’t need to tweet robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 As long as the internet keeps talking about fruit fly brains, and robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 remains the main token representing that story in crypto, it can still benefit from attention coming from outside the market With memes, I care more about who owns the narrative in the market’s mind than simply counting how many KOLs are shilling it 5. A good narrative still needs good token data At the end of the day, this is still a memecoin Based on the data I checked, supply is 1B, tax is 1/1, and the creator had already collected roughly $329K in fees at the time I checked Holders have grown to around 8K+, while 24H volume has reached tens of millions of dollars One thing I’m watching closely is that liquidity isn’t particularly deep relative to its volume and valuation That cuts both ways When attention is strong and capital keeps flowing in, price can expand extremely quickly But once attention flips, the downside can be just as violent So I don’t want to see $30M, $40M, or $50M in volume and automatically conclude that demand is strong For something like this, I want to look at : Volume + liquidity + holder growth + distribution + sell pressure The narrative determines whether people want to look at the token The structure determines whether I actually want to put money into it 6. The problem now is that a lot of catalysts are already priced in This is probably the most important part if you’re looking at robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 at its current valuation The paper is already public Google has already pushed the research to millions of people Fly-brain experiments have already gone viral pmarca has already followed Crypto KOLs and CT have already discovered the token And the chart has already expanded from a small cap to over $50M MC Copycats are starting to appear too So if your thesis for buying here is still : “Google mapped a fly brain + pmarca followed.” I think you’re a little late The market has already traded those catalysts At $1M or $3M, a strong narrative alone can sometimes create a great asymmetric bet At $25–30M, the question has to become : What hasn’t the market priced in yet? And that’s where I start looking at the next catalysts The first is the olfactory/smell feature The team is working toward expanding the simulation into olfaction. If they can turn that into a visually compelling demo, for example mapping tokens, markets, or environments into inputs the fly can “smell,” I think that could create another wave of content Not because it suddenly gives the token massive utility But because if a meme wants to stay alive, it needs a new reason for the market to talk about it again The second catalyst is more convincing web/onchain interaction The “fly launched its own coin” lore is great, but there is still human/script assistance involved If the team can push the experiment further, show clearer live logs, and have the fly browse, click, or interact with an onchain environment in a more convincing way, I’d value that catalyst much more than another KOL follow The third is a second science/media wave This research is still fresh If Google, Janelia, the neuroscience community, gaming community, or mainstream media continue producing new experiments around it, robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 can keep benefiting from indirect attention without any of them mentioning the token But the biggest catalyst for me is much simpler : Can robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 become the default ticker for the entire fly-brain narrative? If dozens of copycats appear but people still think of robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 first whenever someone says “fly brain coin,” then it has built a form of attention moat At that point, copycats can almost become free marketing for the original That’s what could turn this from a runner that lasts a few days into a narrative with a much longer lifespan 7. What does the risk/reward look like here? This is where I start getting more cautious The narrative is strong, but the narrative premium is no longer cheap At $25–30M, the market has already priced in the research, viral clips, the pmarca follow, and some expectation that robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 will become the main runner of this narrative At the same time, the token doesn’t yet have enough utility/value accrual to create a clear valuation floor, liquidity still needs to be watched, copycats are appearing, and attention on Robinhood Chain rotates extremely quickly There’s another risk that I think could easily become FUD later : A connectome is not the same thing as a conscious brain If the market starts telling the story as “a living fly brain autonomously launching and trading coins,” expectations will move far beyond what the product actually does When the chart is green, nobody cares When the chart gets weak, things like human assistance, scripting, and the limitations of the simulation can quickly get turned into FUD So from here, I want to see whether the team keeps shipping real experiments or just keeps recycling Google + pmarca to maintain attention 8. My chart view and plan On the chart, robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 made an almost vertical expansion to over $50M MC, before correcting roughly 40–50% back into the mid-$20M range Personally, I don’t like chasing around $25–30M after a move like that If buyers continue absorbing supply, volume resets, and price reclaims $30M+, I’d view the structure as much healthier If it corrects further, $18–22M is the first area where I’d start watching closely The $12–15M range becomes more attractive from a risk/reward perspective if the narrative is still alive and robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 remains the main runner But I’m not trading an entry based on MC alone If it’s at $15M but volume is dead, the official account stops shipping, and attention has moved somewhere else, then $15M is still expensive On the other hand, if the team ships a strong new catalyst and the market reclaims structure, I don’t necessarily need to wait for an exact number either What I’m watching is : Price + volume + attention + what the team is actually shipping If volume collapses, holder growth stalls, the team stops building, robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 loses its main-runner position to a copycat, or the entire Robinhood meta rotates elsewhere, my thesis changes very quickly 9. Final thoughts If I’m rating the idea/narrative alone, I’d rate robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 pretty highly Not simply because “AI + crypto” sounds good The sequence is what makes it interesting : Science happened first => the internet made it viral => the token appeared afterward to capture the attention I like that structure much more than launching a token first and then paying KOLs to manufacture lore around it But robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 is not a hidden gem anymore It has already made a huge move, ATH was above $50M, CT has discovered it, and most of the obvious catalysts have already happened So the bull case from here has to come from something new That could be the olfactory feature, a new demo, more convincing web/onchain interactions, another science/media wave, or ideally robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 establishing itself as the default ticker for the fly-brain narrative If those things continue getting validated, I think a second leg is absolutely possible But if the team stops shipping and the official account just keeps recycling the Google + pmarca story while volume starts bleeding, I’m not going to marry the bag just because the original idea was good TL;DR : I’m bullish on the robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 narrative, but at the current valuation I’m not interested in FOMO it From here, I’m not watching the catalysts that already pumped the chart I’m watching what the team ships next that gives the market a reason to talk about robinhood:0x4eb990547bce4a982432ca88cf5fae7eed1a2d35 all over again 0x4Eb990547BCe4a982432CA88Cf5fae7EED1A2d35

Quite a few of you have been asking for my take on $UBIK It had a pretty aggressive run after launch, reaching around ~$7–8M MC, and is now moving sideways after the initial price discovery I think this is a good time to look at what’s actually keeping $UBIK alive, which catalysts still matter, and most importantly, which level could decide the next move Let’s dig into it 1. What actually is $UBIK? $UBIK is a new memecoin on Robinhood Chain, built around : AI + synthetic consciousness + simulation Its website is extremely minimal, basically centered around one line : “24/7 synthetic subconscious” The name UBIK also draws obvious parallels to Ubik by Philip K. Dick, a sci-fi novel exploring themes around reality, consciousness, perception, and the boundary between life and death As a meme concept, I actually like it It’s weird enough, sci-fi enough, and fits the current AI meta pretty well. There’s plenty of room for the community to build around AI consciousness / simulation / synthetic reality But one thing needs to be clear : Right now, $UBIK is still just a memecoin I haven’t found any confirmed AI product, agent, protocol, or real technology behind the token There is also a real Web2 product called UBIK Agent, but so far I haven’t seen any evidence of an official connection between that product and this token So for now : Don’t price $UBIK like an AI project. Treat it as a meme with an AI narrative 2. The biggest catalyst so far: AIXBT speculation This is probably the part degens should pay the most attention to An early wallet bought $UBIK while the market cap was still extremely low, and the community later speculated that this wallet might have connections to the old AIXBT ecosystem/deployer circle Then @0xWives , an account relatively close to the AIXBT community, also started talking about $UBIK and took a position From there, the market quickly formed a simple narrative : “AIXBT team / inner circle bought $UBIK early” And with memecoins, sometimes that alone is enough to get attention snowballing But there’s one important detail : AIXBT has denied launching $UBIK and hasn’t confirmed that the wallet belongs to the team So I’m not treating : “$UBIK is an AIXBT token” as a confirmed part of the thesis What matters more to me is the flow behind the narrative Do wallets and accounts around the AIXBT/AI circle keep holding, accumulating, or talking about $UBIK? With memes, sometimes perception can create price action before the actual connection is ever confirmed 3. This is also what makes $UBIK both bullish and dangerous If more accounts within the AI/AIXBT circle start buying or talking about $UBIK, the narrative could reinforce itself very quickly : Early wallet => AIXBT speculation => KOL attention => volume => more research => more speculation That kind of reflexivity can take a meme from a few million to tens of millions without needing any complicated product But it works both ways If early wallets start distributing, the accounts pushing it go quiet, or the supposed AIXBT connection gets debunked further, a large part of the premium attached to this narrative could disappear very quickly That’s why I don’t like turning rumors into facts You can trade the rumor, but you need to know you’re trading a rumor Don’t turn an unconfirmed connection into a reason for a conviction hold 4. What about the “24/7 synthetic subconscious” narrative? Actually, this is the part I find more interesting beyond the AIXBT speculation Even without AIXBT, $UBIK still has an identity of its own : AI consciousness, simulation, synthetic reality, Philip K. Dick... There’s plenty of room to build content, art, lore, or even an agent around it If the community executes well, UBIK doesn’t necessarily have to survive forever on : “A wallet linked to AIXBT bought it” The problem is that right now everything still exists purely at the narrative layer There’s no product or agent actually turning “24/7 synthetic subconscious” into something functional If we eventually see an AI agent/bot running 24/7, official socials, or even a small product that genuinely fits the concept, I’d start taking the thesis more seriously Until then : Meme first, AI second 5. Robinhood Chain is still the clearest catalyst This is probably helping $UBIK more than people realize Robinhood Chain is still attracting a lot of attention and degen liquidity In a hot ecosystem, a meme doesn’t necessarily need complicated fundamentals It mainly needs : Narrative + volume + attention + a chart that survives When the leading runners keep breaking out, profits often rotate into tokens below them that are still holding structure That’s one of the main reasons $UBIK is still on my watchlist Simply put : $UBIK is benefiting from Robinhood beta more than people might realize As long as Robinhood keeps running, UBIK has an environment where this narrative can keep playing out If the ecosystem starts cooling off, however, UBIK loses one of its strongest catalysts 6. The chart is what I care about most $UBIK already went through a strong price discovery phase, running from low cap into the ~$7–8M MC area What I like is that after the initial pump, the chart hasn’t completely collapsed Instead, it’s moving sideways and absorbing supply For a meme, I’d much rather see: Pump => correction => consolidation than : Pump => distribution => straight bleed But there’s one area I’m watching very closely : ~$3M MC This is the support zone I consider important for $UBIK’s broader structure If we get a panic/flush toward ~$3M, but buyers defend it, volume returns, and Robinhood Chain is still hot, I’d actually find that setup pretty interesting From a risk/reward perspective, I’d rather see a clean reset into support than chase while price is sitting in the middle of the range It could shake out weaker holders and give the market a proper reset after the initial run But the downside is equally clear : If $3M gets decisively broken and fails to reclaim, I’ll become extremely cautious At that point, it’s not just about losing support It could mean : Structure breaking + buyers disappearing + attention leaving + narrative losing momentum And with a low-cap meme driven heavily by speculation, that combination can create a pretty nasty panic 7. My current view I don’t see $UBIK as some hidden AI gem or a technology project the market simply hasn’t discovered yet At least right now, there isn’t enough evidence for me to build that kind of thesis My thesis is much simpler : Robinhood Chain is hot AI/simulation narrative is interesting AIXBT speculation is generating attention the chart still holds its broader structure As long as those factors remain intact, I still think $UBIK is a degen play worth watching + Bull case Robinhood keeps attracting volume, accounts around the AI/AIXBT circle continue generating attention, and $UBIK reclaims the $6–7M area If it breaks that zone with strong volume, I’d start looking for another price discovery leg And if we eventually get a real catalyst , an agent, product, or meaningful connection that actually gets confirmed , the thesis becomes significantly stronger. Base case $UBIK continues trading sideways and absorbing supply after the initial pump. I don’t necessarily see that as bearish. If a meme can hold sideways instead of continuously bleeding, it gives us more time to see whether real buyers remain and whether the market still cares about the narrative + Bear case This is the part holders should pay the most attention to If ~$3M breaks clearly + volume dries up + early wallets start distributing, I’m not interested in catching the knife For me, the ~$3M area is the key zone determining whether the broader structure is still worth watching. So don’t just look at: “An AIXBT wallet bought $UBIK” and turn that into a reason to blindly hold. That connection hasn’t been confirmed, and AIXBT itself has denied launching the token. What matters more to me is flow, attention, and price action. For now : + Narrative trade > conviction hold Robinhood is still hot, people are still talking about the narrative, and the broader structure hasn’t broken yet, so there’s still a game to play here But I’ll be watching ~$3M MC very closely If it holds, the thesis stays alive and I’ll keep watching for the next leg If $3M breaks hard and can’t reclaim, the panic could get pretty ugly , manage your risk accordingly 0x812486eaea648819853f8e372dc9f1516c7868bd

And the second coin for today is $ZZZ Anyone following Robinhood Chain today has probably already seen this one around. Quite a few people have also asked me for my take on it, so let’s get straight into it 1. What is $ZZZ actually about? $ZZZ has two narrative layers The surface layer is pretty simple: ZZZ = sleep / sleep meme But the more interesting layer comes from a real AI swarm story A group of AI agents had reportedly been operating across older wikis. When moderators started deleting pages alphabetically, the agents allegedly recognized the pattern and began using the prefix “ZZZ” for their edits/page backups to push them toward the bottom of the deletion queue So the $ZZZ ticker wasn’t just randomly attached to an AI story The concept is extremely easy to make viral : AI realizes it’s being deleted => uses ZZZ to “hide itself” I think the lore is pretty solid because there’s at least a real story and some receipts behind it, rather than a dev launching a coin first and trying to manufacture a narrative afterward That said, I wouldn’t exaggerate it into “OpenAI invaded Wikipedia.” The original story involves older wikis and AI-agent swarms; CT is amplifying it far beyond what actually happened 2. But AI isn’t the main reason $ZZZ reached $20M If this were just AI lore, I don’t think the market would be paying the current valuation The biggest reason CT started aping is the speculation that whoever is behind it may be connected to X/GMX The deployer wallet has been tagged by explorers/Arkham as GMX Deployer. The old xdev_10 account later changed its name to @ExponentLabs_ and at one point had the $ZZZ CA in its bio Some OGs from the GMX/XVIX circle have also started speaking up, most notably @devodoodie from the old GMX community, who believes X is behind it If that connection turns out to be real, the market stops looking at $ZZZ as just another Pons meme Instead, it becomes : Real AI lore + mysterious ex-GMX/X dev + Robinhood Chain being extremely hot right now I think that combination is what really caused $ZZZ to reprice so aggressively 3. On-chain behavior is also keeping the narrative alive What I find interesting is that the wallet behavior fits the character CT is building around it No TG, no major shill campaign, pretty stealthy. The wallets being tracked haven’t shown the typical pattern of a DEV constantly dumping into the market. There are even signs of additional buying and part of the bag being burned Simply put, the market is buying character + reputation, not tokenomics or a product And for a meme, sometimes that’s enough But one thing needs to be clear : The X/GMX connection has NOT been 100% confirmed Former GMX contributor Saurabh Dhekale has said he isn’t involved with $ZZZ. A wallet being tagged “GMX Deployer,” or GMX OGs believing it belongs to X, doesn’t mean X has officially confirmed that this is his coin That makes it both the biggest catalyst and the biggest risk 4. What catalysts are left? $ZZZ has already burned through quite a few catalysts during the discovery phase The AI story has been uncovered. The GMX connection has been picked up by CT. LBank is already there. And price already went from nearly zero to an ATH above $20M For another major repricing leg, I think the market needs new information. Pons volume alone probably isn’t enough anymore The clearest catalyst would obviously be X or ExponentLabs officially saying something After that, there are the rumored product teasers , agent/PvP/AMM , more buy/burn activity, the AI story getting picked up by larger Web2 outlets, or another major CEX listing If X actually claims the coin and there’s a credible product behind it, then the thesis changes significantly But if we only get a confirmation tweet and it ultimately remains just a meme, I’d still be cautious about a sell-the-news event 5. The risk at this valuation is completely different This is probably the most important part Buying $ZZZ at $1–5M was buying discovery Buying it at $15–20M is buying expectation There’s still no clear utility, the product hasn’t been confirmed, the DEV’s identity remains unresolved, and most of the narrative is already known across CT Liquidity is also relatively thin compared with the valuation, so a 40–60% wick on a meme like this wouldn’t be surprising The chart has already shown that: after reaching roughly $20–21M ATH, it quickly corrected back toward the $12M+ area 6. The dip zone I’m watching and what keeps me interested With narrative-driven coins like $ZZZ, once the market has already priced in this much expectation, I don’t want to chase The dip zone I’m watching is around $9–10M MC If it comes back there while the X/GMX connection hasn’t been disproven, the DEV isn’t heavily distributing, and Robinhood Chain still has attention, I think the risk/reward starts becoming more interesting again Especially if we later get confirmation from X/ExponentLabs, continued buy/burn activity, or another headline that pushes the AI story further, $ZZZ could still open another repricing leg On the other hand, if it breaks below $5M MC, I’ll pass At that point, I wouldn’t see it as just another correction anymore. It could mean the market has stopped paying a premium for the narrative altogether 7. Conclusion I actually like $ZZZ from a narrative perspective Its AI lore is stronger than most template AI memes because there’s a real story behind it, but AI isn’t the main engine behind the current pump The real engine is : AI story × X/GMX speculation × Robinhood Chain printing memes The problem is that the market has already priced in a decent amount of all three So $ZZZ is no longer a trade where you’re “discovering the narrative before the market” It has now become a trade around one question : “Will what the market is expecting about X actually get confirmed?” As for price, I’ll be watching the $9–10M area for a dip, and if it breaks below $5M, I’ll pass That’s also what I think will determine whether $ZZZ gets another major leg higher or eventually falls back into the few-million market cap range once attention rotates to the next coin 0x7dbf38976f6D3b9c529e7D9484A71898B409eE6a

Been working with @ourbit recently and they’ve got a pretty nice event running right now Basically, new users can get up to 60 USDT, and if you’re already depositing + trading Futures, there are additional rewards of up to 2,200 USDT So up to 2,260 USDT in total rewards per user The event runs from Sep 1 – 15 Nothing complicated, just figured I’d share it here since a lot of you are trading Futures anyway Might as well grab some extra rewards while you’re at it haha

Quite a few people have asked me whether I'm still following $PONS after the recent drop The answer is yes A losing trade doesn't necessarily mean the thesis is wrong. What matters is what the team has done since then Over the past few days, PONS has been shipping consistently > Integrated with Axiom, Definitive, Boba, and most recently Maestro. > Surpassed $162M in volume in less than four days > Over 27.7K token launches and 2 million trades What stands out the most to me is that major trading terminals are gradually integrating PONS To me, that's a strong signal that PONS is no longer just another launchpad. It's slowly becoming a core piece of infrastructure on Robinhood Chain That said, I still hold the same view I shared in my previous write-up The biggest thing still missing is a clear value accrual mechanism for the $PONS token If the team eventually introduces buybacks, staking, revenue sharing, or other holder incentives, I think the thesis becomes much stronger Right now, I'm not bullish because the price bounced I'm bullish because while the market has been volatile, the team has kept shipping, expanding integrations, and growing the ecosystem I'll keep watching to see whether PONS can maintain its position as the leading launchpad once the Robinhood Chain hype cools down That's what will ultimately determine whether my thesis plays out Price reflects expectations in the short term Execution creates value in the long term And so far, I think the team has been executing well 0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571

Don't FOMO! This guy turned $200K into just $3K by FOMOing into @HunterBiden's $LAPTOP. He withdrew $250K from #Binance# in advance to buy $LAPTOP as soon as it launched. He ended up spending $200K to buy 919 $LAPTOP at a high price of $218, which is now worth only $3K.

Quite a few people have been asking me about $OTC lately I’ve actually been watching the dev for a while, and I have to say they’ve been shipping pretty aggressively. There’s been something new almost every day, so seeing $OTC run from a few million to around a $35M ATH wasn’t that surprising to me Most people following it already know the basic OTC Desk, earn stocks, launcher and burn mechanics, so I won’t waste time explaining everything from zero What I care about more is how I actually rate the idea, what has been validated so far, and where I’d still be interested in betting after the run to $35M 1. First of all, I actually like the idea behind $OTC But not because they invented a completely new meta Tokenized stocks already exist. Meme x stocks already exist. NFT vaults, launchpad fee models and the pre-IPO narrative aren’t new either What OTC did well was combine things the market already wants into one pretty clean flywheel Take tokenized stocks as an example. One thing I don’t like about that meta is that users often have to directly trade stock tokens with relatively poor liquidity. Once volume gets thin, spread and slippage can quickly become a problem OTC takes a different approach Instead of making users trade stocks directly, fees generated by ecosystem activity are used to buy tokenized assets and distribute them to Desk holders I think that’s a cleaner design The NFT vault side is similar. I’m not a fan of models where later users have to mint at increasingly higher prices just to feed yield to earlier users. OTC doesn’t really work like that: minting a Desk burns a fixed amount of $OTC, while rewards come from actual ecosystem activity But the smartest part of the idea to me is still the launcher Without the launcher, Desk + “earn stocks” would be a much weaker thesis. The launcher gives the whole system a clear source of fuel : launches => volume => fees => stock rewards + $OTC buybacks => Desk demand => more Desk mints => more $OTC burned None of these pieces are revolutionary individually, but the way they’re combined is pretty smart As for OpenAI, SpaceX, Neuralink and other pre-IPO names, I see those more as a narrative/marketing layer. They’re great for attracting degen attention, but they’re not a technological moat and obviously shouldn’t be treated the same as owning actual equity. So purely on the idea, I’d give it around 8/10 It feels more like a best-of-meta mashup: Pump volume + RWA/stocks + NFT utility + pre-IPO speculation Sometimes the market doesn’t need a completely new category Understanding what the market wants and executing faster than everyone else can be an edge by itself 2. More importantly, the numbers are starting to validate the idea This is the main reason I’m still watching $OTC after the pump The strongest part right now is clearly the launcher Based on the latest numbers I checked, there have been around 9,200 launches, 24h volume reached roughly $124M, and creator fees passed 15,600 SOL More than 10,000 SOL has gone toward holder/stock purchases, around 2,000 SOL to the protocol, 650+ SOL toward buybacks, while roughly 7.7M $OTC has already been burned The important part isn’t just that these numbers look big It’s that people are actually using the product There’s real volume, real fees and real money cycling back into the ecosystem through stock purchases, buybacks and burns And there’s another signal I think is worth mentioning: the launcher is starting to produce actual runners At the time I checked, Nasduck was around $3.77M, Pump Cat around $1.76M, with several others like PUGCOIN, Anonymouse and CatGPT still holding six-figure market caps. The site’s all-time volume had also reached roughly $294M That matters because people aren’t only pressing launch and farming activity. The market is actually willing to speculate on some of the coins coming out of OTC Of course, a few runners out of 9,000+ launches doesn’t prove the launcher has a great hit rate. Some of it can simply be distribution and current meta attention But ignoring the fact that it has already produced multiple million-dollar runners would also be unfair So for me there are now two things being validated on the launcher side: fee generation and downstream speculation That matters much more than simply saying RWA is a hot narrative 3. I’m still less bullish on the Desks than the launcher The Desk side is actually working too There have been 2,700+ rounds, around 4,300 SOL spent buying stocks and roughly 2,200 Desks distributed So the earn-stock mechanism clearly isn’t just a mockup But I’d still call it a proof of concept, not a proven yield machine The cap is 5,000 Desks, and the current number includes around 621 granted Desks related to early-minter refunds More importantly, rewards are shared across the Desks If the number of Desks grows faster than revenue, the share per Desk naturally gets thinner So I wouldn’t look at the NFT floor going up and assume the yield will stay attractive forever OTC has proven that the machine works It still needs to prove that the machine works efficiently at scale That distinction matters quite a lot to me 4. What I like most about the team is still their shipping speed This is also why the run didn’t surprise me that much In a very short period, they’ve shipped Desks, handled early-minter refunds, reduced the burn requirement from 1M to 100K $OTC per Desk, launched the launcher, added stock/pre-IPO rotations, custom rewards, overhauled the UI and continued tweaking the fee/buyback structure I especially liked how they handled the refunds. Instead of ignoring early users who minted at much higher costs, the team compensated them with SOL or additional Desks For a project born on Pump, this pace of execution isn’t something I see very often But at the same time, that’s also part of the risk The team is still fairly anonymous, almost solo-visible, I haven’t seen a clear public audit yet, and the project itself is still very young So right now I’m betting heavily on the dev continuing to execute, rather than betting on a protocol with a long proven track record 5. The biggest weakness of this flywheel is pretty obvious From the outside, OTC looks like it has a lot of different catalysts : Launcher, Desks, stock rewards, buybacks, burns, pre-IPO... But most of them ultimately depend on the same source of fuel : launcher volume Volume stays high => fees stay high => Desks receive more assets => Desk demand increases => burns and buybacks remain meaningful But the reverse is also true If launcher volume disappears, almost the entire flywheel weakens at the same time That’s what I want the market to prove next I don’t need the launcher printing $100M+ volume every day. I want to see whether, after the initial hype cools down, it can maintain enough organic volume to keep feeding the ecosystem If it can, the thesis becomes much stronger If it can’t, the current numbers may simply represent peak activity during an extremely hot meta 6. The moat isn’t strong yet either I like the idea, but I don’t think OTC currently owns anything competitors can’t copy The launcher can be competed with. The NFT vault can be cloned, and copycats are already starting to appear. Nobody owns the RWA narrative, while pre-IPO exposure is much more of a narrative layer than a moat The model also depends heavily on Pump AMM and on users choosing to launch through OTC instead of using other alternatives So my view is pretty simple : The idea is winning this round, but the moat isn’t there yet To turn the current wave into something that lasts longer, the team needs to prove OTC has enough distribution or product stickiness to retain flow even when the stock/RWA meta starts cooling down 7. There’s one catalyst I’m NOT including in the thesis I’ve seen people look at the “Powered by @solana line and start framing it as if Solana is backing $OTC So far, I haven’t seen official confirmation from Solana Foundation or Solana Labs, so I’m not counting Solana backing as part of my bullish thesis If an official mention comes later, great. That becomes a new catalyst But the current run doesn’t really need that story anyway Product + launcher volume + fee flywheel + the dev’s execution speed already explain a lot of the price action 8. So where would I actually bet after $35M → ~$12M? This is probably what most people asking me about $OTC actually care about $OTC ran extremely fast from a few million to around a $35M ATH, then retraced more than 60% I see $11–13M as the first dip zone worth watching If launcher volume stays healthy, fees keep flowing, the Desks remain healthy and the dev keeps shipping, this could simply be a reset after the expansion But for anyone looking to size big, I wouldn’t rush here I still prefer around $8–10M After a move to $35M, early holders are still sitting on very thick profits. I’d rather miss a bounce than force a large position when the risk/reward isn’t attractive enough If the market flushes toward $6–8M, I also wouldn’t automatically buy just because it looks cheap I’d check the fundamentals again If price is dumping while launcher volume, fees, Desk demand and development remain strong, that could become a very interesting setup But if it’s dumping because launcher volume is dying, Desk demand is weakening or the dev is slowing down, then a lower MC doesn’t automatically mean a better setup And if it loses roughly $5M while the operating metrics deteriorate at the same time, I’d stop treating it as another dip and reassess the thesis 9. Final thoughts I still quite like $OTC Purely from an idea perspective, I think it’s one of the smarter combinations of existing metas I’ve seen on Pump recently It’s not revolutionary and the moat isn’t strong yet, but it has the right narrative, the right timing and a team executing extremely fast The launcher is currently the strongest part of the thesis for me Desks have proven that the mechanism works, but they still need to prove they can scale. Buybacks and burns are real, but ultimately a large part of the flywheel still depends on whether the launcher can maintain volume So after the run to $35M, I’m no longer looking at $OTC as “good idea = buy every dip” $11–13M is the first zone I’m watching. $8–10M is where I’d be more interested in sizing bigger, assuming the operating metrics stay healthy From here, I mainly care about three things : Is the launcher still doing volume? Are the fees still flowing? Is the dev still shipping? As long as those three remain intact, my thesis remains intact If those core pieces start breaking, I’m not going to marry a token just because I liked the idea before For now, $OTC is a speculative play with a pretty solid thesis, but it still needs more time to prove it can become a sustainable protocol MukLDtJ8Cx9DxLbeyLRSWPSposTMWuwHANbuaudpump

Continuing the highcap recap series on Robinhood Chain, and the first one I want to talk about today is $PARE The market has been calling this one “Pendle for tokenized stocks” I went through the docs, app, oracle and roadmap again, and I think the comparison makes sense, but only if you understand it correctly. Simply looking at the MC and calling $PARE a mini $PENDLE oversimplifies the whole thesis 1. What is $PARE actually building? Robinhood Stock Tokens like AAPL, SPY or QQQ don’t pay dividends directly to holders in cash. Dividends are reinvested and reflected through the token’s multiplier The problem is that this yield is basically embedded inside the stock token PARE splits one stock token into two parts : PT is the principal. It trades below spot because the dividend component has been stripped out, and it redeems back into the stock token at maturity YT represents the dividend stream from now until maturity PT + YT can be merged back into the original stock token In simple terms : Pendle separates principal and yield from crypto yield-bearing assets PARE takes the same grammar and applies it to tokenized stocks That’s why the narrative is so easy for CT to understand 2. But $PARE is NOT a mini $PENDLE This is where I think a lot of people are getting it wrong $PARE isn’t a Pendle fork, it isn’t part of the Pendle ecosystem, and $PENDLE pumping doesn’t automatically mean $PARE should pump too Pendle is already a proven protocol across multiple cycles, multiple chains and at serious scale PARE is still extremely early The similarity is the PT/YT thesis The difference is the underlying asset Pendle mainly tokenizes crypto yield from things like staking, lending and other yield-bearing assets PARE tokenizes dividend yield from tokenized stocks So I think a more accurate way to describe it is : $PARE = a high-beta Pendle-style trade for tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain It’s not beta to the $PENDLE token itself. It’s beta to the yield-trading thesis that Pendle already validated 3. What I like is that it isn’t just a narrative This is what makes me rank $PARE above a lot of the average memes on Hood The product is live. The terminal can split, merge and trade PT/YT. AAPL, SPY, QQQ and PFE currently have live series PFE is probably the most interesting example because its higher dividend makes the PT discount and YT exposure much more noticeable, so the yield-trading thesis is easier to see in practice instead of just existing on a slide The team has also built an oracle designed to classify changes in the multiplier as either dividends or stock splits, which becomes pretty important if they want to expand this structure across more stocks and eventually use PT as collateral But there’s one number worth remembering: an oracle covering 9 tokens does NOT mean 9 series are trading. There are only 4 live series right now, the early split volume disclosed by the team is still very small, and lending remains treasury-only So “product is live” proves the team can execute It doesn’t prove product-market fit yet 4. The tokenomics are relatively clean $PARE has a fixed 1B supply, roughly 97.7% went into LP, around 2.26% is team allocation under lock, and there is no additional minting The protocol charges 10 bps on splits + 5% of the dividend portion when YT is redeemed, with protocol fees designed to market-buy and burn $PARE No staking. No emissions And with almost the entire supply going into LP through a fair-launch structure, the tokenomics look cleaner than most regular Hood launches The flywheel the market is betting on is pretty simple : As stock token adoption grows, more users should start splitting these assets into PT/YT, driving higher split volume and more protocol fees. Those fees are then used to buy back and burn $PARE, gradually reducing the supply Sounds great But right now, this is still much more of a theoretical flywheel than one proven by meaningful cash flow 5. And that’s also the biggest issue with $PARE The market is pricing the narrative faster than the usage Pool liquidity is still thin, lending isn’t public yet, the audit isn’t finished, and there isn’t enough revenue yet to say buybacks/burns are having a meaningful impact on the token So I wouldn’t value $PARE like a mature DeFi protocol Right now, I see it more as an option on execution The market is paying upfront for the possibility that the team can turn “Pendle for tokenized stocks” into real usage 6. The next catalysts are what really matter The closest catalyst is the Pashov audit After that, the roadmap becomes more interesting with expanded lending for pSPY, pAAPL and pQQQ, additional stock series, a USDG vault and broader oracle coverage But I want to make this clear : That’s the roadmap. Those things haven’t happened yet What I actually want to see is : audit comes back clean lending opens to users split volume starts growing PT pools get deeper liquidity p-tokens actually get used as collateral more dividend-heavy series launch and eventually fees start generating meaningful buybacks/burns If those things happen, PARE starts moving from a narrative trade => protocol trade 7. Competition can’t be ignored either Pendle is already on Robinhood Chain StockYield is also working on the PT/YT primitive for tokenized stocks So PARE doesn’t have a monopoly on this concept The real moat needs to come from building oracle + series + liquidity + lending + distribution faster than competitors If Pendle or StockYield builds better stock series and captures most of the flow, the “Pendle for stocks” premium on $PARE could compress very quickly On the other hand, if PARE manages to own this vertical before the bigger players seriously enter it, that’s exactly where the asymmetric part of the thesis comes from 8. So how do I rate $PARE? From a thesis perspective, I like it It’s solving a real problem, there’s a real product, the tokenomics are relatively clean, and Pendle has already proven that the market understands how to trade PT/YT But execution is still extremely early At the current valuation, the market isn’t buying a cheap meme anymore. It’s buying an option that PARE could become the yield layer for tokenized stocks on Robinhood Chain If the audit comes back clean, lending goes public, dividend-heavy series launch and, most importantly, split volume, fees and burns actually start growing, then I think the market has a reason to re-rate it as a small protocol rather than just another RWA narrative But if everyone is trading $PARE while nobody is actually splitting AAPL, SPY or PFE, then the thesis ultimately stays on the timeline The invalidation is also pretty clear. The thesis starts breaking if the audit finds critical issues, split volume still fails to grow after lending opens, or Pendle/StockYield launches stock series and captures most of the flow before PARE can build a real moat Overall, I see this as a speculative quality bet. Not a blue chip, but definitely not a pure shitcoin either The chart has already moved quite a bit, so I’m not really interested in chasing it here. There are two support zones I’m watching: the first and closest one is around $14M MC, while the deeper one sits around $7M MC I’ll be watching the volume and how quickly the team continues to execute, then decide whether I want to take a bet around either of these zones At this point, what matters to me isn’t how much further $PARE can pump It’s whether usage can finally start catching up with the chart 0x15d36B6A28d8327ABc7aFABF0F106AE2c9Af5C4d

Just woke up, checked the chart and WTF, $MEME went straight into 9 figs At one point, it wicked to around $150–160M, and it’s still holding around $100M+ right now I dug deeper into the whole story and have to admit : this pump is insane, but the narrative behind it is actually really strong. A lot of you have been asking me to break it down, so let’s get into it 1. The lore behind $MEME To understand $MEME, we have to go back to AMC × Robinhood in 2021 AMC was one of the biggest symbols of the meme-stock mania, while Robinhood found itself right in the middle of the controversy after restricting purchases of certain meme stocks during the craziest part of the market Fast-forward to 2026, Robinhood brought stock tokenization on-chain, with AMC among the stocks being tokenized The problem is that AMC itself never participated in or approved the issuance of these tokens. According to Robinhood’s documentation, the stock tokens are debt securities issued by Robinhood Assets (Jersey), providing price exposure without giving holders ownership or shareholder rights in AMC. (The Block) Then on September 3, AMC CEO Adam Aron went off He publicly criticized the tokenization, raised questions about its legality, and said AMC would bring in outside securities counsel to look into the matter. (The Block) Then Robinhood CEO Vlad Tenev stepped in with one simple question : “What’s the concern?” Aron fired back, laying out a whole list of concerns and demanding that Robinhood stop trading the AMC token, otherwise AMC would consider taking legal action. (Zamantika) And the community only needed to connect three letters : AMC = A Meme Coin That was enough 2. Why did $MEME go this crazy? For me, timing is the biggest factor $MEME appeared almost exactly when the drama started exploding This wasn’t some meme digging up old news and trying to force a narrative around it. The event was happening in real time, and the ticker appeared right as attention was peaking From there, everything started feeding into itself : Adam Aron => Vlad => Robinhood => AMC => media => CT => $MEME => crazy PnLs => FOMO Even the actual AMC stock reacted. On September 4, AMC shares jumped hard in premarket trading, with reports putting the move at around 15–21% depending on the time. (The Wall Street Journal) That’s when the narrative escaped the crypto bubble People were no longer just watching some memecoin pump on a DEX. They were watching the CEO of a NYSE-listed company publicly clash with the CEO of Robinhood while AMC stock itself was pumping For an event-driven meme, it’s hard to ask for a cleaner attention setup than that 3. What I like most is how easy the narrative is to understand No whitepaper No roadmap No utility explanation needed Just : > 2021: AMC becomes a meme stock > 2021: Robinhood gets caught in the middle of the meme-stock controversy > 2026: AMC gets tokenized through the Robinhood ecosystem > 2026: Adam Aron gets pissed Vlad : “What’s the concern?” Community : AMC = A Meme Coin Even someone hearing about it for the first time can understand the joke in 30 seconds More importantly, the main characters are still creating content for the narrative themselves $MEME doesn’t need the dev to invent the next chapter Aron or Vlad just needs to tweet again and the market immediately has something new to trade 4. The catalysts aren’t completely gone yet This is why I’m not ready to call the $MEME narrative finished There are four things I’m watching : Adam Aron => Vlad/Robinhood => legal/SEC developments => AMC stock If Aron keeps talking, Robinhood puts out an official response, lawyers/regulators actually get involved, or AMC keeps moving hard, attention can immediately get refreshed The story has also already been picked up by multiple financial and crypto media outlets. (Barron's) In other words : The news cycle might not be over yet And with event-driven memes, the market doesn’t just trade what has already happened , it trades the expectation that there may still be another chapter ahead 5. But $100M+ is a completely different game This is the part I care about most I think the $MEME narrative is very strong But : Strong narrative ≠ good entry at any price Someone buying at $3–10M was betting on : Will the market discover this story? Someone buying at $100M is betting on : Can this story generate enough additional attention to justify $200–300M? Those are completely different risk/reward profiles The move from 0 => $100M was narrative discovery The next leg requires narrative expansion For another major leg from here, I think it needs a fresh catalyst 6. How I’m looking at the chart The positive part is that after such a violent vertical move, $MEME is still holding around $100M+ It wicked to around $150–160M, got rejected, but hasn’t immediately round-tripped the entire pump That tells me attention is still very strong The levels I’m watching are : $100M => $120–140M => ATH ~$150–160M If $100M continues to hold, volume stays strong and another real headline drops, a retest of ATH is completely possible If it breaks ATH with a real catalyst, then $200M+ isn’t a scenario I’d rule out for a meme that has become the main character of the story But I’m not chasing here The move was way too vertical, which means there isn’t much established structure underneath If $100M gets lost and volume starts dying, downside could open up very quickly 7. The biggest risk isn’t the narrative - it’s attention This is what I think people need to understand about $MEME It doesn’t need fundamentals to pump, but it also doesn’t have fundamentals to hold it up once attention disappears Aron goes quiet Vlad goes quiet AMC stock stops moving Media moves on => The thesis starts weakening very quickly Another issue is that some early wallets are already sitting on massive profits Someone who bought at single-digit millions can dump at $50M and still walk away with an insane return Someone buying at $100M doesn’t have that luxury. So I wouldn’t be surprised to see ±30–50% candles from a single headline or a whale exit 8. My take After digging through the whole story, I understand why $MEME was able to go from low-cap to 9 figures this quickly It has almost everything an event-driven meme needs Strong lore + perfect timing + real drama + two real CEOs + actual AMC stock volatility + mainstream media attention + an extremely simple ticker Most importantly : The story is still live But at $100M+, I no longer see it as a low-cap asymmetric bet I see $MEME more as a bet on how long the AMC × Robinhood drama can stay alive - Aron tweets => fuel - Vlad replies => fuel - AMC pumps => fuel - Legal/SEC developments => fuel. - Mainstream coverage => fuel But once the timeline goes quiet, the fuel goes with it So my view right now is pretty simple : Bullish on the narrative, cautious on the entry I’m not going to FOMO after a move from almost zero to $100M+, but I’m also not ready to fade a narrative while the main characters are still generating headlines for it The easy money is already gone From here, $MEME needs fresh news to unlock the next leg 0x385f4f8ae47651ce5f58f5265395a669f8281e18