Builders on @CNPYNetwork launch their own nested chains with day zero security from the root network powered by $CNPY restaking. I keep every fee my users create the direct link to my community and full control over the rules and economics of my app. Canopy is the recursive framework that turns simple templates into sovereign chains ready to graduate into independent L1s whenever they are ready. Other builders get the same ownership serving users directly without handing value to someone else. This is how an app grows into a real home not just another deployment. #CNPY#

New to Canopy? Start here 🌿 → Go to → Claim free testnet tokens & explore the chains the community is building → Back your favorites with CNPY and help them graduate Costs nothing. Takes minutes. Expand the Canopy with us.

Help tell Canopy's story - and get rewarded for it 🌿 Our new Creator Leaderboard is LIVE on @NucleusCodes, with $100,000 in CNPY allocated for the top 300 contributors. Sign in with X and check your eligibility ↓

Canopy Network is coming to Nucleus Starting June 16, the Top 300 contributors will compete for a share of $100,000 worth of tokens Support @CNPYNetwork, the fastest and easiest way to launch a Layer 1 blockchain 👇

🌲 Investing in Canopy Notes No.033 One of my favorite indicators isn't TVL. It isn't transaction volume either. It's simple. What are people actually building? Infrastructure only becomes meaningful when someone uses it to create something interesting. That's why I paid attention to Block Rocket. Not because of the leaderboard. Not because someone nearly reached a 100x multiplier. Not because another player managed an incredible 162-game winning streak. Those are fun statistics. But they aren't the real story. The real story is that a community member had an idea... Built it... Shipped it... And other people immediately started interacting with it. That's how ecosystems grow. Not through announcements. Through products. The internet wasn't defined by the servers that powered it. It was defined by the applications people couldn't stop using. Blockchain won't be any different. Every successful infrastructure eventually reaches a point where the conversation shifts away from the technology itself. People stop asking how it works. They start asking what they can build with it. That's the transition I find most interesting. Canopy Network isn't valuable because sovereign chains are an interesting concept. It's valuable if those chains enable builders to launch products that couldn't have existed otherwise. In the end, users rarely remember the infrastructure. They remember the experiences it made possible. And that's probably the highest compliment any infrastructure can receive. @CNPYNetwork #CNPYNetwork# #Canopy#

😍The most expensive thing in Web3 isn't gas. It's time. Every new chain launches, and what happens? 3 months waiting for a block explorer. 2 more months for wallet support. Another month begging for analytics dashboards. Half a year gone before you even say "we're live." Count it. How many features could you have built? How many iterations? How many early users kept? @CNPYNetwork cuts that 6 months to zero. Not saving you a little work. Giving you day-one focus on what actually matters—your product. No waiting for explorers—they're built in. No begging for wallets—native support. No bridging headaches—native interoperability. Write in Python? Go. TypeScript? Go. Go, C#, whatever you like—go. NestBFT consensus holds you from block one. But here's the deeper layer. Deploying a contract used to mean renting a tiny shelf in someone else's chain. Pay gas. Block their traffic. Block your own. Canopy doesn't give you a shelf. It gives you your own lane. Nested Chains let you run solo. Shared security catches you if you fall. Interoperability keeps you connected. Recursive architecture lets you grow—and eventually walk out fully independent. Every app gets its own chain. Your rules. Your gas. Your scaling pace. While others argue L1 vs. L2, Canopy already lets you own a whole chain. More chains → more paths. Every path that grows → a stronger canopy over all. The roads are built. Now it's your turn to drive. @CNPYNetwork

🌲 Investing in Canopy Notes No.027 I've always believed that markets are good at one thing. They discover value. Not by asking people to vote. But by asking people to commit. There's an important difference. Anyone can say they like an idea. Far fewer are willing to support it with their time, their capital, or their reputation. That's where real signals begin to appear. The same principle applies to technology. Thousands of ideas sound promising. Only a small number gather enough builders and enough believers to become lasting ecosystems. What I find interesting about Canopy Network is that this process is built into the infrastructure itself. Chains don't simply declare themselves successful. They grow. Communities back the ones they believe in with CNPY. As support accumulates, those chains move closer to becoming fully sovereign Layer 1 networks. It's a subtle shift, but an important one. The network isn't deciding which ideas deserve to grow. The community is. That reminds me of another lesson from the internet. No central authority decided which websites would become the most influential. Users did. Developers did. Communities did. Perhaps blockchain infrastructure should work the same way. Instead of trying to predict the next great ecosystem, create an environment where thousands of experiments can emerge—and let participation determine which ones mature. If that's the direction we're heading, then the real product isn't just another blockchain. It's a system that continuously discovers builders worth believing in. And that may be one of the most scalable ideas of all. @CNPYNetwork #CNPYNetwork# #Canopy#

🌲 Investing in Canopy Notes No.026 One idea has been changing the way I think about blockchain ecosystems. What if launching a chain wasn't the finish line? What if it was simply the beginning? Traditionally, blockchains feel binary. Either a network launches... or it doesn't. Success often depends on raising enough capital, attracting enough attention, and convincing enough people before the product has even had time to prove itself. That has always felt backwards to me. The best products rarely begin fully formed. They begin as small experiments. They attract a handful of believers. They improve through feedback. Only then do they become something much larger. That's how startups grow. That's how open-source software evolves. Why shouldn't blockchain infrastructure follow the same path? Recently, I came across Canopy Network's idea of letting chains start small and gradually become fully sovereign once they reach a defined CNPY threshold. What caught my attention wasn't the mechanism itself. It was the philosophy behind it. Instead of asking builders to prove everything on day one, the network allows them to earn independence over time. Growth becomes something that's demonstrated, not assumed. Perhaps sovereignty shouldn't be granted simply because a chain exists. Perhaps it should be earned because a community has decided it's worth supporting. That feels surprisingly close to how the internet evolved. Communities came first. Infrastructure followed. Maybe blockchain is beginning to rediscover that order. @CNPYNetwork #CNPYNetwork# #Canopy#

🌲 Investing in Canopy Notes No.026 One idea has been changing the way I think about blockchain ecosystems. What if launching a chain wasn't the finish line? What if it was simply the beginning? Traditionally, blockchains feel binary. Either a network launches... or it doesn't. Success often depends on raising enough capital, attracting enough attention, and convincing enough people before the product has even had time to prove itself. That has always felt backwards to me. The best products rarely begin fully formed. They begin as small experiments. They attract a handful of believers. They improve through feedback. Only then do they become something much larger. That's how startups grow. That's how open-source software evolves. Why shouldn't blockchain infrastructure follow the same path? Recently, I came across Canopy Network's idea of letting chains start small and gradually become fully sovereign once they reach a defined CNPY threshold. What caught my attention wasn't the mechanism itself. It was the philosophy behind it. Instead of asking builders to prove everything on day one, the network allows them to earn independence over time. Growth becomes something that's demonstrated, not assumed. Perhaps sovereignty shouldn't be granted simply because a chain exists. Perhaps it should be earned because a community has decided it's worth supporting. That feels surprisingly close to how the internet evolved. Communities came first. Infrastructure followed. Maybe blockchain is beginning to rediscover that order. @CNPYNetwork #CNPYNetwork# #Canopy#

Projects Fundraising on RootData (Jun 22 - Jun 28) Last week, 23 blockchain companies/projects received funding. 💎 @bitbank_inc — Cryptocurrency exchange, acquired by SBI Holdings in $289M. 💎 @fomo — Cross-chain trading app, raised $75M in Series B by @IndexVentures, @usv, @benchmark & others. 💎 @alliumlabs — Blockchain data infrastructure, raised $40M in Series B by @AmplifyPartners, @kleinerperkins & @TheoryVC. 💎 @OnyxOdds — Financial products for the compute economy, raised $33M in seed round by @a16zcrypto, @CrucibleCap, Galaxy Ventures & others. 💎 @OnyxOdds — Sports prediction and betting platform, raised $20M led by @Payward. 💎 @CNPYNetwork — Layer 1 development framework, raised $8.5M by @Arrington_Cap, @fenbushi, @snzholding & others. 💎 @CambrianNetwork — AI infrastructure agreements, raised $6M by @polychain, @FranklnTempletn, @NomadCapital_io & others. 💎 @TurboFlow_xyz — Onchain trading platform, raised $6M in seed round by @PanteraCapital, @DCGco and Susquehanna Crypto.