Tucker Carlson’s face says it all as Senator Ron Johnson reveals he cured his acid reflux with hydrochloric acid after years on Zantac, Prilosec, and Nexium. The medical industry wants you to believe heartburn comes from too much acid.

🚨 Tucker Carlson was the favorite to be the next Republican nominee a year ago. He’s at 6% today. That’s $617 million in real money saying he’s done. What happened? Iran broke him. He warned the war was coming. It came anyway. And when the base split on the bombing, Tucker didn’t win the anti-war side. He lost the pro-war one. Then the Olympics. He got booed on live TV at the opening ceremony in Milan. His price crashed in days. Now look at who’s left. JD Vance and Marco Rubio. The Vice President and the Secretary of State. Two men with cabinet jobs. Two-thirds of the whole field. Tucker spent ten years selling himself as the guy they couldn’t control. The market just told him he was wrong. Who else built a brand on being the outsider — only to watch the party walk past them?

🍰 BrownDust2 | Carlson’s Birthday 🎉 It’s Carlson’s Birthday — the Rookie Mercenary Assault Captain! 🎉 『…I know. Mercenaries and knights aren’t the same. But that’s exactly why I admire them even more. The conviction I had when I left the Imperial Knight Academy—it hasn’t changed. Chivalry isn’t about protecting nobles only. As the charge captain, as a member of this new mercenary corps, I’ll show you the finest chivalry there is. Sometimes… I go watch mercenary idol shows. Seeing them stand on stage and chase their dreams with pride reminds me why I believe in my own. So… since it’s my birthday and all—want to go see a show together?』 Today is Carlson’s birthday! He’s the kind of person who refuses to let go of his beliefs, and proves what “chivalry” means in his own way. Carlson often goes to mercenary idol shows—watching them boldly pursue their dreams helps him hold onto his own, too. Why not send him a warm birthday message to cheer him on for the road ahead? #HappyBirthday# #Calrson#

🚨 John Kiriakou says Tucker Carlson could ACTUALLY win. And reveals he personally told Tucker: “You have to run… and I’m ALL IN if you do.” Not because Tucker is a politician… But because Americans TRUST him. “He says what he believes - even at significant personal cost.” Kiriakou also reveals: ▪️ Tucker’s family has received threats ▪️ Security is now part of his daily life ▪️ Running could place his family in real danger 📍 EXCLUSIVE: For the first time ever, John Kiriakou gets interviewed LIVE in CYPRUS 🇨🇾 during his May 2026 visit to the island. 🎙️ Full interview link in first reply.

Briahna Joy Gray: "I know many people on the left who would happily vote for Tucker Carlson before AOC..." Your friendly reminder that the extremes of the horseshoe have more in common with each other than they do with anyone in the center.

UNHERD: “This shift in support has deep implications for 2028. Marco Rubio and the rest of the Aipac-aligned shortlist are likely to dominate the primary debates, but a candidate sympathetic to Carlson or Steve Bannon now has a viable lane on Israel that did not exist in 2024. Perhaps even JD Vance, always willing to change his positions over the years, could defect to differentiate himself from Rubio. The Yale polling found that Carlson and Bannon both outperform their overall electability scores meaningfully among Republicans under 35.”

‘Why does Thomas Crooks’ online profile end virtually as soon as he starts corresponding with this Willy Tepes? Maybe they moved the communications to a different forum that’s not traceable… like Telegram.’ — @megynkelly & @emilyjashinsky ‘One other question that Tucker Carlson’s reporting raised that I really do think needs to be answered is who this Willy Tepes guy is. Because as soon the would-be assassin switched over to hating Donald Trump, you have this Willy Tepes guy in the comments urging him to use political violence.’ — @AnaKasparian on @PiersUncensored We recovered thousands of Willy Tepes’ messages from the extremist Telegram channels he operated in. He encouraged political violence and discussed assassinations of politicians on US soil. Key findings from the full investigation ⬇️

Larry Page wanted to build a digital god. "He really seemed to want some sort of digital superintelligence. Basically a digital god, if you will. As soon as possible." Elon Musk asked: "What about making sure humanity's okay here?" Page called him a speciesist. "I said yes, I'm a speciesist. You got me. What are you? I'm fully a speciesist. Busted." Musk spent 10 minutes with Tucker Carlson explaining why he created OpenAI: Tucker asked the basic question. "All of a sudden AI is everywhere. People are playing with it on their phones. Is that good or bad?" Musk starts with first principles. "The smartest creatures as far as we know on this Earth are humans. That's our defining characteristic." "We're obviously weaker than chimpanzees. Less agile. But we are smarter." "Now. What happens when something vastly smarter than the smartest person comes along in silicon form?" "It's very difficult to predict what will happen in that circumstance." He explains the singularity. "It's called the singularity. Like a black hole. Because you don't know what happens after that." "It's hard to predict." He argues for regulation. "I think there should be some government oversight. Because it affects the public. It's a danger to the public." "That's why we have the Food and Drug Administration. The Federal Aviation Administration. The FCC." "We have these agencies to oversee things that affect the public. Where there could be public harm." "You don't want companies cutting corners on safety. And then having people suffer as a result." He addresses the perception that he fights regulators. "People think I'm some sort of regulatory maverick that defies regulators on a regular basis. But this is actually not the case." "Once in a blue moon, rarely, I will disagree with regulators. But the vast majority of the time my companies agree with the regulations and comply." Tucker asks the obvious question. "All regulations start with a perceived danger. Planes fall out of the sky. I don't think an average person playing with AI on his iPhone perceives any danger." "Can you explain what you think the dangers might be?" Musk's answer. "AI is perhaps more dangerous than mismanaged aircraft design or production maintenance or bad car production." "In the sense that it has the potential. It is a small probability, but it is not trivial." "It has the potential of civilization destruction." He explains the timing problem. "Regulations are really only put into effect after something terrible has happened." "If that's the case for AI, and we only put in regulations after something terrible has happened, it may be too late to put the regulations in place." "They may be out of control at that point." Tucker asks directly. "It's conceivable that AI could take control and reach a point where you couldn't turn it off and it would be making the decisions for people?" Musk's answer. "Yeah. Absolutely." "That's definitely the way things are headed." He explains why OpenAI exists. "Larry Page and I used to be close friends. I would stay at his house in Palo Alto. I would talk to him late in the night about AI safety." "At least my perception was that Larry was not taking AI safety seriously enough." Tucker asked what Page said. "He really seemed to want some sort of digital superintelligence. Basically a digital god, if you will. As soon as possible." Musk pushed back. "I agree there's great potential for good. But there's also potential for bad." "If you have some radical new technology, you want to take actions to maximize the probability it will do good. Minimize the probability it will do bad things." "It can't just be barreling forward and hope for the best." Then the speciesist moment. "At one point I said: what about making sure humanity's okay here?" "And then he called me a speciesist." Tucker: "Did he use that term?" "Yes." "I said yes, I'm a speciesist. You got me. What are you? I'm fully a speciesist. Busted." That was the last straw. "At the time, Google had DeepMind. Google and DeepMind had three-quarters of all the AI talent in the world." "They obviously had a lot of money and more computers than anyone else." "We're in a unipolar world here. One company that has close to a monopoly on AI talent and computers. And the person who's in charge doesn't seem to care about safety." "This is not good." So he created the opposite. "I thought: what's the furthest thing from Google?" "A nonprofit that is fully open. Because Google was closed and for-profit." "Open AI. Open source. Transparent. So people know what's going on." "We don't want this to be a for-profit maximizing demon from hell that just never stops." Tucker asks about the specific danger. "The cool parts of AI are obvious. Write your college paper for you. Write a limerick about yourself. There's a lot that's fun and useful." "But can you be more precise about what's potentially dangerous? What specifically are you worried about?" Musk's answer. "The pen is mightier than the sword." "If you have a superintelligent AI that is capable of writing incredibly well. In a way that is very influential, convincing." "And is constantly figuring out what is more convincing to people over time." "And then enters social media. Twitter. Facebook. Others." "And potentially manipulates public opinion in a way that is very bad." "How would we even know?"

Long Lake Co-Founder & CEO @alextaubman says AI is driving a convergence between services businesses and software companies. "What you typically see is even though these are really extraordinary businesses with incredible customer trust and decades or even centuries of operating history, the margin structures in these services businesses traditionally have been lower than software." "What we're seeing now is a convergence of services and software characteristics over time where if you can make your team 20%, 30%, or 40% more productive, then that allows you to deliver more customer value, more goods and services, and different products to customers, which has historically been more associated with software companies." "For example, Amex GBT is an over 111-year-old business, founded in 1915 to help American Express travelers customers get out of Europe during World War 1. They bought a business called Carlson Wagonlit Lee which is over 150 years-old. So in terms of managing tech transformations, Amex GBT literally was created around the time of the invention of the airline, so these businesses have already managed many of them."