I read a bestselling self-help book that declared: 'Never settle for what you have. Maximize every asset and turn knowledge into immediate profit.' I was so inspired by the author's message that I immediately listed his book on eBay for $4 more than I paid for it. Knowledge applied. Asset flipped.

From crypto to onchain, tokenized stocks, CFD, IPO Prime, stocks 2.0 and beyond. We have kept turning new markets into new opportunities for every trader. Because “enough" was never the plan. Neither should you. Never settle.

Shareholders, The NetNet Capital Management Treasury has zoomed to a level of more than $17,000,000. We've achieved this milestone in under 60 days. The NetNet Credit Desk has nearly $2,000,000 being lent out, and USDG lenders are earning over 20% on their capital. We will continue to showcase what is possible on-chain, and will never settle for the bare minimum. More Soon.

Heat wave in Times Square is calling. @berobrewing answered. Tom Holland (@TomHolland1996), Actor and Founder of BERO, joined us outside the Nasdaq tower to celebrate his premium non-alcoholic beer brand and its mission to help people experience life’s richness and never settle.

Adding ZK to @Arbitrum BoLD protocol was surprisingly simple. How does it work? Today, BoLD settlement works like this: → Proposers can make assertions (a claim about the chain's new state); when a new assertion comes in a challenge timer starts → No rival assertion within the challenge window? The assertion is confirmed → Rival posted? The challenge protocol kicks in New multi-prover path (everything above still holds, plus): → A proposer can prove any unconfirmed assertion with a ZK proof + K-of-N attestations from the Fast Confirmation Committee → ZK proof verifies on the parent chain & enough attestations check out? The assertion settles early - no waiting out the challenge window Why this beats a ZK-only design: 1. Multi-prover security: Fast confirmation needs two independent systems to agree: a ZK proof verified on the parent chain + attestations from committee nodes re-executing the chain. To fast-confirm a bad state, an attacker has to break both at once. TEE-run committee nodes are planned as a further hardening step. 2. Deterministic upper bound on settlement: If the prover stalls or has a bug, the chain simply falls back to optimistic settlement: slower, never halted, funds untouched. A ZK-only chain in the same spot may never settle without security council action. 3. Pay for proving only when you need it: Proving is optional per assertion: pure fraud-proof chains pay nothing, Hybrid ZK chains proves on demand to settle early or resolve disputes, and ZK Prove All chains prove everything for always-fast settlement. ZK-only stacks have one mode: prove every batch, forever. @Offchain will bring a proposal to the DAO to upgrade Arbitrum One to ZK settlement, and other chains built with Arbitrum Platform will be able to upgrade at will. Stay tuned for more 👀