PSA TO NEOCLOUDS COPING ABOUT CLUSTERMAX RATING: If you run a restaurant and you get bad Google reviews, don't attack the review. Instead listen and it might make your service better. For more food-related metaphors about neoclouds, check out:

PSA. Please don't send me Clanker-slop when I am specifically, in a follow up, asking for a non-clanker explanation. ESPECIALLY when it's SECURITY RELATED. Clawa summed it up best: "Two coding agents playing telephone over a security report is clown shit." It really makes you not consider those things seriously because of a built-in slop radar, even when the problem IS there and the fix is pretty damn simple. For the record: I am not saying this was worthless, it just made the situation much clunkier than it could've been. I merged it at 2:30 AM so before you jump to conclusions, this is not me dunking on a vulnerability report per se. Clankas have no clue about priorities, they just dump TONS of useless information, local implementation details that do not belong in a publicly available extension instead of giving JUST the actual issue and core of the problem. It honestly took me 10x more brainpower to understand WTH was actually behind the report than just saying "mate can we do something about cross-origin stuff and locking things up a bit more here and there"... Partially, because the Clanker described a somewhat complex chain of events as "just trust me bruv it's 11/10 scale of severity and the entire world will crumble, and SURELY all the hackers in the world are actually doing it rn". (this goes back to all my complaints about review bots being shit and Clankers not knowing how to do harness engineering in a way that is actually beneficial to themselves) We're at a point where we do not need 10 steps of repro. We need ONE good sentence, written by a human, that explains the core of the problem. The problem was hypothetical, programmatically based on code and would need an attacker to know PRECISELY what is running on the computer to whack through your browser via audio control. I think at that point you have bigger issues with your setup... Anyway rant over, this is now fixed in Pi Codex and Gippity remote control - as always, update everything religiously :P side note: sol 6 was completely useless assessing any of it. do whatever you want with this piece of information xD

PSA if a big account is messaging you on telegram out of the blue when you have literally never had a private interaction, thats a scam at one point in past cycles there were people who got phished and scammed by people purporting to be bloomberg writers the scammers will use publicly available information to make you think "oh yea i did see him talking about that on the timeline yesterday" etc. they wanna make u feel special, or like youre the only person that can help them, to make you let down your guard these scammers can also hide their username from people not on their friends list *** BIO =/= USERNAME *** this is incredibly important to double check once u get fucked once its over stay safe

PSA: You can add custom middleware to your Managed Deep Agents. With middleware, you can add behavior around model calls, tool calls, and the agent lifecycle. Here's a quick demo.

PSA: Etherscan has not launched, issued, sponsored or endorsed any token associated with “Robinscan”. Any such token is unaffiliated with Etherscan. The official Etherscan-built explorer for the RobinHood Chain is Any other website, token or project using similar branding, interface or design should not be assumed to be affiliated with or endorsed by Etherscan. Please rely only on Etherscan’s official domains and channels.