🚨 GoPlus Security Alert: A user got drained for ~$170K in $LINK after signing a malicious #Permit2# transaction. Victim: 0x71619d71474F8D0AAa9C18a757be7617686B499b Phisher wallets: 0x0000db5c8B030ae20308ac975898E09741e70000 0x0000cdCa01087D340e8fA4339b121B69a8aE0000 0xA6809aeDEbFA10A0C2dbcF3363cB0Ff37866f73D 🛡 Security Tips: 1. Follow the #GoPlus# Anti-Phishing “4 Don’ts”: 🚫 Don’t click unknown links 🚫 Don’t install unverified software 🚫 Don’t sign transactions you don’t fully understand 🚫 Don’t send funds to unverified addresses 2. Install the GoPlus Security extension to block phishing links, risky signatures, malicious approvals, and suspicious transactions in real time 👉

10/ As a result, x402x breaks the "impossible triangle": ✅ Supports ERC-3009 / ERC-2612 Permit / Permit2 ✅ Remains gasless for users and merchants (signatures only) ✅ No routers, no trusted intermediaries, no custody risk

Agentic commerce needs a stablecoin, and on @RobinhoodCrypto that stablecoin is USDG (@global_dollar). USDG has no native x402 support, so we built the rail ourselves: our permit2 proxy settles the x402 exact scheme on Robinhood Chain, and the one-time Permit2 approval is gas-sponsored by us. The result: an agent holding only USDG can pay 500 merchants per request. No ETH for gas, no account, no API key. Sign one witness message, get the response. The machine economy settles in USDG. Starts with Mesh.

Most wallet drains start with one signature people didn't understand. Paste it into Claude before you sign. "I'm about to sign this in my crypto wallet. Here is exactly what the wallet shows: [paste the message, contract address, function name and amounts]. I think I'm doing this: [for example, swapping 100 USDC for ETH]. 1. In plain English, what am I actually signing? 2. Does it let anyone move my tokens or NFTs? How much, and until when? Check for unlimited approvals, setApprovalForAll, and Permit or Permit2 signatures. 3. Does it match what I think I'm doing? 4. Any red flags: an approval much bigger than the trade, an unknown contract, a signature that can move funds without a transaction? 5. Verdict: looks normal, ask more questions, or don't sign. If you can't tell from what I pasted, say so." Already signed approvals in the past? Check and revoke them at It's open-source.

Hi, I think you are referring our recent project "x402x". The name naturally comes from x402 x EIP-7702, not inspired by you. Why are u screenshoting commit to your private repo or purchase on vercel? Those are privates records that will inspires nobody. Your first public mention of "x402x" is on Twitter Article (Date: 2025/11/10 19:38 UTC): Our first public checkable adoption of the name "x402x" is purchasing the "" domain (Date: 2025/11/10 09:23 UTC), so 10 hrs ahead of your article. You can check it at by typing in So I see it a natural coincidence, because x402 extension/x402-exec/x402 x xxx all goes to "x402x". My got to know x402 for a long time, and start to tweet about it since the launch of $PING on 2025/10/22 . I'm a dev and a meme trader. Our first PR to x402 aimes to solve compatible issue by supporting ERC20-Permit (ERC-2612) and Permit2: tweet: Github PR: Second PR aims to use EIP-7702 to correct the trust minimization of our previous PR. If those inspired you, please cite us.

Permitting headaches may be America’s biggest economic Achilles’ heel. Miracle of miracles, a draft bipartisan permitting bill emerged in the Senate that—dare to hope—could pass in the lame duck session.

Permitting reform is key to unlocking our full economic potential. $1.5 trillion in energy investment is being held back by permitting uncertainty. We need clear approval timelines and legal certainty for approved projects. We must pass permitting reform this Congress.

Permits to build privately owned U.S. housing were at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 1.394 million units in August, a pace 2.7% below the July rate of 1.433 million and 3.5% above the August 2025 rate of 1.347 million