Solo 401K exposure to $META The fact that I’ve been DCAing all year on it and still have an average of $668, which is literally higher than where it was on Friday when it fell to $660, is kind of hilarious. The 10% move today is amazing but also shows how much the name has done nothing all year and I’d imagine most people are in that $620-$680 average. Hoping $700s are the new normal and $800 would be giving the company the premium it deserves for their growth! My only fear is Zucks does an equity raise like Google does if we get to those levels but probably would be worth it at that price. $META +10% and best day since Jan 2025

SoloHost gives Pioneers more ways to use their computers for local AI and easier access to other self-hosted applications, further extending the utility of Pi Desktop and Nodes beyond blockchain infrastructure. OpenClaw and the Atlassian MCP Server show how SoloHost can support different types of self-hosted software for different user needs, from local AI agents to more specialized developer utilities. Through SoloHost, people can benefit from AI while keeping more of their data and computation on their own devices and reducing reliance on third-party remote infrastructure. Learn more

【Solo Raid - Luxurious Spider Issue Notice】 Commanders, We have confirmed an issue where, under certain conditions, the shield may occasionally not be removed as intended during battles against Luxurious Spider in the current Solo Raid. The cause of this issue has been identified, and we plan to fix it as soon as possible. Further details will be provided in a separate notice. We sincerely apologize for the inconvenience caused. GODDESS OF VICTORY: NIKKE Team #NIKKE#

【Solo Raid Start Notice】 The 40th season of Solo Raid is coming soon! Command your squad and battle the boss to obtain materials! The Boss for this season is Luxurious Spider. Please refer to the image below for more info. Season Duration 📅 8/20 12:00 ~ 8/27 4:59 (UTC+9) *Content has been modified and reposted. #NIKKE#

Solo staker's taxes are a supposed reason for capping issuance. Proponents argue that solo stakers would be better off under the cap than a high staking ratio where their rewards come with higher dilution. I think this argument falls apart when you model how much it costs to solo stake, which is unfortunately a lot. Electricity, hardware, internet, downtime, and the headaches of DIY are not free. At a 70% staking ratio on today's curve (higher than I believe we can reach for the sake of argument). A 32 eth solo staker makes ~1.9% APR, ~$1167 gross. Operating costs are $537 (calculator here: taxes @30% are $350. You make $280 per year net. (0.46% APR). At a 40% ratio under a cap (lower than I believe we will reach for the sake of argument). You make ~0.8% APR, ~$491.50 gross. Operating costs are still $537, taxes are $147.50. You net to a $-193 loss. (-0.31% APR) This effect applies even if you pump your eth stake way up to minimise the fixed operating costs. You have to argue about eth dilution and what that might do to the eth price because of stock to flow models, or make generous assumptions about why delegators making 0.72% APR for no effort will unstake, to try and make the math make sense. What am I missing? P.S. You make $1050 (1.71% APR) and $442 (0.72% APR) under these options if you delegate instead of solo staking. We definitely need to solve the disparity in taxation, and to make solo staking more economical, but this EIP does not seem to be beneficial for solo stakers as it claims to be.