🚨New Must-Learn Magik Combos! DP Loops + fireball loops! These are high damaging combos that also set up some of her best oki. This character is way too fun lol Here are a few examples. Complete Magik Guide Soon! #Tokon_Magik# #MARVELTōkon#

Dominic Kundel (from @OpenAI) gives the inside scoop on where GPT-5.6-Sol gets magical: computer use. Background browser tabs, app control, multi-agent fanout, and Codex verifying its own work all change when latency drops. Join us in the Token Billionaires Lounge, presented by @cerebras and @aiDotEngineer. In conversation with @dkundel // @MilksandMatcha

So many things happening on solana right now, it's hard to keep up, but Sensei got you - @phantom rolled out football world cup prediction markets in-app on Solana - @Backpack announces no fees on stock trading through July and private beta has gone live for the backpack credit card - @FlashTrade V2 is now out of beta with fees as low as 2 bps and one click trading. Trade with link in their bio. - @blknoiz06 saving solana trenches with over $9M distributed in airdrops to 700+ wallets so far on his coin ANSEM - @MagicEden is facing a federal class action that accuses ME of misleading buyers of ME, a token down 99% from its 2024 launch. - @Titan_Exchange announced new DCA badge that can be obtained through trading $1k in DCA volume - @solsticefi postpones 2nd SLX unlock from july 5th to july 9th with $2,000 in SLX giveaways every day as incentives for delay.

New Stanford paper argues that, under equal reasoning budgets, one LLM usually solves multi-hop problems better than many coordinated ones. The core point is almost embarrassingly simple. A single agent keeps the whole problem in one internal chain of thought, while a multi-agent system has to slice that chain into messages, summaries, and handoffs. Every handoff is a compression step. And once reasoning is compressed, some information is easier to drop than to recover, which is why the paper leans on the Data Processing Inequality as a formal explanation rather than just an empirical hunch. The experiments back that up across Qwen, DeepSeek, and Gemini on FRAMES and MuSiQue: when thinking-token budgets are matched, single-agent systems usually match or beat sequential, debate, role-based, and ensemble setups. Here’s the part most people miss. Many celebrated multi-agent gains may not be architectural gains at all. They often come from spending more test-time compute, surfacing more visible reasoning, or benefiting from evaluation quirks that make the pipeline look smarter than it is. The paper is especially sharp when it looks for the boundary case instead of pretending the rule is universal. When the single agent’s effective context is degraded by masking, substitution, or misleading distractors, multi-agent pipelines become more competitive and sometimes win, not because message passing is magical, but because structure can partially stabilize corrupted reasoning. That is a much narrower and more useful claim than “more agents is better.” It suggests the real trade-off is not single versus multi so much as latent reasoning versus external coordination, with context quality and compute accounting deciding which side looks stronger. For multi-hop reasoning, the default should now be clear: start with one strong model, and treat extra agents as a repair strategy, not an upgrade. ---- Paper Link – arxiv. org/abs/2604.02460 Paper Title: "Single-Agent LLMs Outperform Multi-Agent Systems on Multi-Hop Reasoning Under Equal Thinking Token Budgets"

If you wanna switch to @Cloudflare Email Sending today, here's my prompt for you, as always I'm unaffiliated, not paid, not sponsored, but I like it, make sure you remove the space before the .com in the API url I added to avoid it becoming a link in this tweet: # Prompt: Migrate transactional email to Cloudflare Email Service Paste this into Claude Code (or Cursor, or any agent) running inside your project. --- I want to migrate this codebase's outbound email from its current provider (Postmark / SES / Resend / SendGrid / Mailgun / etc.) to Cloudflare Email Service (public beta, launched April 2026). Help me do this carefully. ## Context: what Cloudflare Email Service is A new transactional email API from Cloudflare. Endpoint: ``` POST .com/client/v4/accounts/{ACCOUNT_ID}/email/sending/send Authorization: Bearer {API_TOKEN} Content-Type: application/json ``` Request body: ```json { "to": "user@example.com", // string OR array of strings "from": "no-reply@yourdomain.com", // string OR {"address":"x@y","name":"Display"} "subject": "...", "html": "

...

", // optional "text": "...", // optional (one of html/text required) "cc": ["..."], // optional, array "bcc": ["..."], // optional, array "reply_to": "...", // optional, single string "headers": {"List-Unsubscribe": "<...>"} // optional, e.g. for newsletters } ``` Success response: HTTP 200 + `{"success":true,"result":{"delivered":[],"queued":[],"permanent_bounces":[]}}`. Failure: non-200 OR `success:false` OR non-empty `permanent_bounces`. Always check all three. Pricing: $5/mo Workers Paid plan + 3,000 emails free + $0.35 per 1k after. Roughly 5× cheaper than Postmark. No batch send endpoint — loop single sends. ## Steps you should follow ### 1. Verify prerequisites with me Before writing any code, ask me to confirm: - I have a Cloudflare Workers Paid plan ($5/mo) - I've onboarded my sender domain(s) in Cloudflare dashboard → Email → Email Sending → Onboard Domain (this auto-adds SPF/DKIM/DMARC + cf-bounce MX records) - I have an API token with `email_sending:write` scope (created at → Custom Token) - I have my Cloudflare account ID Don't proceed until you have these. ### 2. Recommend a domain reputation strategy Most apps should split senders across 2-3 subdomains so spam complaints on one don't drag down deliverability on others: - `mail.` or `members.` → transactional (login, receipts, password reset, in-app notifications) - `e.` → cold/recovery (abandoned cart, win-back campaigns) - `newsletter.` → opt-in newsletters with List-Unsubscribe headers Each subdomain needs to be onboarded separately in Cloudflare. Ask me which I want. ### 3. Audit existing email sends Use grep/search to find every place in this codebase that sends email. Look for: - The current provider's SDK class names, API URLs, env/config vars - Generic patterns like `mail()`, SMTP usage, `nodemailer`, etc. Group findings by email type/purpose (e.g. "magic-link login", "payment receipt", "weekly newsletter") rather than by file. Tell me what you found before changing anything. ### 4. Add a single helper function Don't sprinkle Cloudflare API calls across the codebase. Add one helper (provider-specific name like `sendEmailViaCloudflare()`) that: - Defaults `from` from a config var (don't hardcode) - Parses `"Name @domain>"` strings into the API's `{address, name}` object form - Accepts `cc`/`bcc` as either string or array - Accepts a `headers` dict (newsletters need `List-Unsubscribe` + `List-Unsubscribe-Post`) - Returns `bool` (true on success, false on any failure) - On failure, logs/alerts somewhere I can see (Telegram, Sentry, log file — match what the codebase already does) - Sets curl/fetch timeouts (5s connect, 15s total) so a stuck CF API can't hang the request - Treats `permanent_bounces: [...]` non-empty as a soft failure ### 5. Migrate one low-stakes email type first Don't migrate everything at once. Pick the lowest-stakes email type in the audit (something where landing in spam wouldn't lose me money or users — e.g. "internal admin alert", "profile photo rejection") and migrate just that one. Test it end-to-end. Confirm the email actually arrives. Only then propose the next migration. ### 6. Stop me from migrating login email yet If my codebase sends magic-link login or password-reset emails, do not migrate those to Cloudflare yet. Cloudflare Email Service is brand new (~1 month old at writing). Its IP/domain reputation is unproven. Login emails landing in spam = users locked out. Keep those on the current provider until at least 3 months of clean deliverability data on the lower-stakes types. Tell me this explicitly. ### 7. Suggest commit boundaries After each successful migration, suggest a focused git commit with a clear message. Don't bundle unrelated changes. ## Important caveats to surface to me - Beta product. Pricing isn't fully finalized. SLA undefined. Could change. - No batch endpoint. Mass sends (newsletters to 1000+ recipients) need a loop — at ~150ms/send that's ~2.5min per 1000. Fine for crons, bad for sync user-facing flows. - No bounce webhooks yet. Surface failures via the response body's `permanent_bounces` array. - Suppression list auto-managed. Hard bounces, repeated soft bounces, and spam complaints get blocked. Spam-complaint suppressions are hard to remove (anti-abuse). - No per-message logs/dashboard yet. Use the response's `messageId` for tracking if I need it. - List-Unsubscribe headers are passed through verbatim — Gmail's bulk-sender requirement still met, but only if I include them in `headers`. ## Your first action Before writing any code: do step 1 (ask for prerequisites) and step 3 (audit existing sends), then propose the migration order with a brief explanation of the reasoning. Wait for my confirmation before making changes.