Describe the job. Get an agent that runs it on its own. Triggers, tools, and guardrails, wired to your stack. Not a chatbot. Most automation projects stall at the same place: the handoff between what someone described and what an engineer had to build. You write a spec. Someone queues it. Months later you have a workflow that half-works and nobody remembers why it was scoped that way. This is different. You describe what you need in plain language. Coworker builds the agent out for you. Triggers, data sources, permissions, the review step before anything gets submitted. All of it configured from the description. What you're looking at: an Infosec Questionnaire Responder. Slack-triggered. Watches #infosec-responses#. When a vendor questionnaire drops in, it reads your security wiki in Notion, your policies in Confluence, your SOC 2 evidence in Google Drive. Drafts a response. Routes it for review. Submits it. Every time. Without a ticket. Without someone hunting for the policy doc. Without waiting for the one person who knows where everything lives. The setup takes minutes. The agent runs indefinitely. And you didn't write a line of config to get there. What's the first workflow your team would hand off?

Watch it work, not just wait for it. Every run logged: what came in, what went out, what needed a human. Most automation is a black box. You set it up, it runs, you hope it's working. When something goes wrong you find out from a customer, not from the agent. This is the Infosec Questionnaire Responder. Live. 12 runs this week. 92% auto-resolved. 9:14 AM: 18 questions drafted, cited SOC 2 report. Answered. 7:02 AM: 2 low-confidence answers flagged for review. Needs review. Yesterday, 4:41 PM: 6 questions drafted, approved in 12 minutes. Answered. Yesterday, 11:20 AM: contract terms question routed to legal. Escalated. The agent knows what it knows, flags what it doesn't, and routes what it can't handle. Every decision logged. Every handoff visible. Nothing disappears into a queue. 92% handled without a human. 8% escalated to exactly the right person. That's not a black box. That's a system you can actually trust. What's the workflow at your company where nobody knows if it's actually running until something breaks?

🚨 NEW: Delaware Chancery is letting fraud claims proceed after sellers alleged a PE-backed buyer overstated EBITDA by more than 100% — and failed to disclose that a government program generating 40% of revenue was effectively gone. (Delaware Courts) In Kowatch v. ACI Learning, the sellers of cybersecurity company Infosec say diligence materials showed 2022 EBITDA of $14.1M. Financials issued just days after closing showed $6.9M. They also allege the defendants knew before closing that the VET TEC program, historically about 40% of revenue, had exhausted its funding. (Delaware Courts) The court has not found fraud. But it ruled the core pre-closing fraud claims can move forward because the stock purchase agreement lacked sufficiently clear anti-reliance language. (Delaware Courts) A significant Delaware ruling for founders, PE firms and anyone negotiating earnouts or rollover equity.