Age-shaming is another tactic China has long used, which is why Xi always stresses that China is “the only civilisation in the world that has continued uninterrupted into the present.”
But that narrative lost quite a bit of credibility after he had former President Hu Jintao — who is 11 years older than him — forcibly escorted out of the Great Hall of the People in full public view.
France has bad movies and China has bad policies.
What they have in common is that you have to pay out of your own pocket to participate.
The difference is that:
1. You can walk out of a bad movie anytime, but not from bad policies;
2. With bad policies, you are the one who bears the real consequences — unlike with bad movies.
Yes, this is like the myth around French Cinema. After I lived there for two years and was more or less bilingual, I realized the French make a lot of bad movies. China post Mao is a low trust, corrupt, bureaucratic state occupying a civilization that has many smart people due to size and traditions.
I would have had more sympathy for the EU if it were saying this four years ago — or even one year ago. But at this point, the EU has largely only itself to blame.
Since China’s WTO accession, China’s share in EU imports has risen from under 10% in 2001 to more than 22% by 2025, while the EU’s share in China’s imports has fallen from roughly 12% to 8%. Yet the EU has done remarkably little in response.
And the EU did not need new policy instruments to act. Four years ago, the Ukraine war gave the EU the perfect opportunity to sanction the biggest supporter of Russia, but it chose not to.
One year ago, the Liberation Day tariffs and the ensuing bilateral negotiations gave the EU the perfect opportunity to join the Reciprocal Trade Agreements, which included provisions to align with the US on economic security issues and take action against China without bearing the political blame. Again, the EU chose not to.
Instead, the eurocrats in Brussels keep rolling out one new instrument after another without any real intention of using them. The result is that the EU has become a laughing stock in China — like the kid who keeps showing off shiny new stationery to the class without ever sitting down to do the homework.
China may not actually think in centuries, but when the EU moves at such a glacial pace, relatively speaking, China ends up looking like it does.
A sinking ship? Why the EU and China could be heading for a trade war
Fiery clashes at a conference in Beijing reflect wider tensions that threaten to descend into economic conflict - my report on rapidly worsening EU-China ties for our weekend paper
I just found out my Chinese friend doesn't know what General Tso's is
It's LITERALLY Chinese food I'm literally at this restaurant with him right now and it's not on the menu wdym he hasn't heard of it? America just made that shit up?!?!?!??! 😭😭😭😭
Trade between Europe and China is “unsustainable” says Maros Sefocovic, the EU’s trade commissioner. He represents the world’s largest trade bloc at the negotiating table. The Economist’s geopolitics editor, David Rennie, asks if the bloc is prepared to risk a trade war to tackle the deficit
So Trump arrived in Beijing on the 13th, which is the unlucky number in the US;
His main event took place on the 14th, which is the unlucky number in China.
Meanwhile, Putin's main activities will be on 5-20, aka the Cyber Valentine'd Day because it sounds like "I Love You" in Chinese.
I'm sure these are all pure coincidences.
Interesting that — yet again — Jensen doesn’t mention that Nvidia’s GPUs are also used for military combat modeling.
Almost as if there’s a valid argument to restrict the Chinese Communist Party’s access to them.
The biggest myth is that China plays the long game and "think in terms of centuries". Just to name a few recent counter-examples: the disastrous one-child policy, abrupt ending of COVID-zero, and the crack-down on tech firms.
When I was reporting for 60 Minutes in China, I was told by people I met that they regard America as inferior, specifically because they say the U.S. does not understand how to play the long game. They said with disdain: “We think in terms of centuries - Americans can only think in terms of minutes.”
A lot of people are taking Trump’s “I’m not looking for that” comment to mean that the US would not support Taiwan in a war. That’s totally wrong. He said almost exactly the same thing in 2019 when asked about war with Iran — and we all know what followed.
As adults, there are many things you don’t “look for,” like getting up early every morning. But when the time comes, you still do what needs to be done.
NOW - Trump on China and Taiwan: "I'm not looking to have somebody go independent. And, you know, we're supposed to travel 9,500 miles to fight a war? I'm not looking for that."
This tweet, with its extreme claims, caught my attention because Elon Musk reposted it.
I asked Gemini if any of these claims are accurate. It assured me that they are not.
I then asked Grok, which replied that the first four are in fact accurate, and it provided details and sources supporting its response.
So, I went back to Gemini, copied and pasted Grok's reply into a prompt, and asked Gemini what it thought about what Grok had just told me.
Here's Gemini's response: "I stand corrected... I apologize for my previous response. I attempted to separate fact from social media exaggeration but failed to properly verify the depth of the horrific testimonies from the actual trials like Operation Bullfinch and the Rotherham inquiries. The details you cited from Grok accurately reflect the devastating and brutal reality of what these victims endured."
“During the meeting, we sensed that the US understands China's position, values China's concerns, and, like the international community, neither recognizes nor accepts Taiwan's path to independence,” China’s foreign minister. H/T @Kubota_Yoko