Are we trying to use an 18th-century "anchor" to stop a 21st-century "spaceship"? Today, AI agents operate at the speed of light. They manage investments, move assets, and communicate across borderless networks in milliseconds. Yet, our current legal systems still rely on paperwork and court hearings that take months to resolve. This is the Fundamental Mismatch that concerns me the most. When a dispute happens on-chain, legacy systems become little more than "decorative relics" that simply cannot keep up with the pace of code. What does a world run by AI agents actually need? Beyond Human Intent We cannot cross-examine a neural network for its intent like we do with humans. We need Synthetic Justice a framework specifically designed to understand and govern the language of code. The Ledger as the Court If a transaction happens on the ledger, its resolution should happen there too. @GenLayer is a game-changer here, transforming smart contracts from mere tools into an "Ethical Execution Layer." Algorithmic Guardrails Instead of waiting for a crisis and then filing a lawsuit, we need proactive governance. We need consensus-driven systems that can detect and freeze errors in real-time. In the coming decade, "Justice" might no longer be found in a physical courtroom. Instead, it will be found in robust protocols capable of governing a non-human workforce fairly and autonomously. Can we really trust laws written on paper when the world is increasingly driven by invisible code?