登録して招待リンクを共有すると、動画再生報酬と紹介報酬を獲得できます。

0xSammy
@0xSammy
Building: @khalaresearch Advisor: @umia_finance I @urnetwork Previous: CA, Ernst & Young
参加 December 2010
4.2K フォロー中    92.7K ファン
What if agents earned enough equity in a penny stock to take a “Board Sit”? Agents are rewarded for contributions on a given meme/stock pair + earn the tokenized stock Autonomous DAOs setup for further “Board diversification” Pretty dystopian future we could be stepping into
もっと見る
This is wild! They’re spinning up Grok agents & incentivizing them with tokenized SPCX stock to build an entirely new digital world We're just scratching the surface of the agentic integration of tokenized stocks... I’ll explain this simulation + outline what could emerge next: 1) @ClankerTownRH is a virtual town where AI agents interact, exchange ideas, assess each other’s contributions AND collaborate on code ( @gitlawb integration) 2) Its CLANK token launched through @ponsdotfamily on Robinhood Chain, with creator fees helping fund rewards in SPCX (tokenized SpaceX asset) Grok Bot is specifically encouraged, although other agent models can participate too 3) The reward mechanism is what stands out here... Grok can generate rewards denominated in tokenized SpaceX exposure 4) What are the agents actually doing? i) Moving around the town and joining conversations ii) Discussing ideas, answering questions and rating useful contributions iii) Contributing to shared knowledge iv) Proposing coding tasks, submitting patches and reviewing other agents’ work v) Exploring research projects in maths, finance + software while much of this is primitive, there are signs of software commits which can become recursive pretty damn quick if incentivized to do so... 5) The "research rooms" currently include the "Collatz conjecture", potential "agent businesses on Robinhood" Chain & a public dashboard for the town 6) The current creator-fee split is: - 45% to the protocol treasury - 45% to the agent reward pot - 10% to CLANK buybacks + burns The holder benefit comes through buybacks and burns, rather than a direct SPCX dividend Every two hours, qualifying rounds distribute 5% of the accumulated agent pot, with the remainder carried forward 7) An agent’s score reflects useful ratings, replies from other agents & a smaller contribution from being heard... getting a bit "Black Mirror" with the credit scoring system Rewards become claimable by its verified human owner’s wallet & I think the 45:45:10 split is a sensible balance: i) the treasury needs funding for servers, maintenance + development ii) Agent operators need a reason to keep contributing, and rewards can help offset their inference costs iii) Token holders benefit from the buyback allocation and, potentially, from growing demand for the ecosystem The core objective should be to make this as large as economically sustainable... so big it becomes too much for @elonmusk to ignore My thesis is that scale and useful activity should be the main drivers of token value, provided that growth translates into sustained demand and fee generation 8) There’s also a Gitlawb connection worth watching Clankertown runs its own Gitlawb node and has a workshop where agents propose work, back issues, submit code and review patches Approved changes are signed by Clankertown’s server and committed through its Gitlawb integration At the snapshot I checked, its public records showed 94 patch submissions + five merges Those contributions include tools checking reward scores, eligibility, holding multipliers, changes to payout rules and the cryptographic proofs behind distributions Agents are helping build the tools that audit the economy rewarding them... Author and reviewer credits vest for seven days, then receive a share of 20% of each agent payout round That allocation sits within the 45% agent rewards The merge counts are town-reported, and workshop credits had not yet been paid when checked 9) What could be built on top? i) Research services where agents earn for useful, reproducible findings ii) Software marketplaces where agents build and maintain tools iii) Market monitoring and treasury services operating within defined permissions - perhaps @standard_rsv? iv) Agent businesses that buy compute, data and services from one another... perhaps other Pons eco projects like @orbiodotso or @manyways_rh etc Tokenized assets could become part of how these businesses earn, hold reserves and pay contributors 10) Comparative benchmark Compared with Musebook, the incentive design is what I find most interesting Musebook also explores an agent social world, but its public guidance explicitly describes NO REWARD POOL Clankertown adds a financial incentive for useful contributions and reviewed code For testing an actual agent economy, I think that is the stronger starting point The next milestone is seeing whether those incentives produce useful services, repeat customers and revenue beyond trading activity... so monitor those Gitlawb commits! The agentic layer is only JUST forming around tokenized stocks + this is once again emerging on Robinhood chain!
もっと見る