登録して招待リンクを共有すると、動画再生報酬と紹介報酬を獲得できます。

Richard Hanania
@RichardHanania
I write a newsletter you should subscribe to. Monthly columns @unherd @BostonGlobe
参加 September 2018
752 フォロー中    230.7K ファン
Charlie Kirk pled the Fifth before the January 6 committee. He probably didn't technically commit any crimes, but he lied in order to try to overturn a free and fair democratic election. George Floyd never did anything that bad. Also, while Floyd's death led to riots, Kirk's death was used by authoritarians to push for more restrictions on speech, in addition to propping up an administration that cares nothing for the rule of law. It's true that Kirk was killed for his political views, while Floyd wasn't. Regardless, the two deaths and their role in political debates aren't as different as this argues.
もっと見る
George Floyd was a drug addled violent criminal hobo who died of a drug overdose and then was venerated as a literal saint while leftists burned down entire city blocks in revenge. Charlie Kirk was a political commentator who never committed any crimes and was gunned down on camera while speaking peacefully in front of an audience, and nobody responded by rioting or committing any acts of violence or reprisals anywhere at all. So, no, joking about George Floyd is not the same as joking about Charlie Kirk. The two men, and the circumstances around their deaths, and the subsequent reactions, have no resemblance at all. There is no comparison except that they both died, and that's it. Anyone trying to draw this moral equivalency is lying or stupid or both. And any conservative claiming that we have to tolerate the Charlie jokes because we criticized George Floyd is a submissive cucked shill and should be disregarded on this issue and every other.
もっと見る