FORMAL UPDATE — $AKE / AKEUSDT I have submitted a formal Form TCR to the U.S. CFTC concerning $AKE / AKEUSDT. Since that filing, additional material on-chain evidence has been identified, preserved, and submitted to the regulator. I will not publicly disclose the complete evidentiary record, wallet map, transaction routes, or account-linkage analysis while these materials remain before the regulator. The blockchain records exist. The exchange records exist. The questions are now very simple. 1. WHERE DID THE AKE TOKENS ACTUALLY GO? AKEDO publicly describes allocations involving: Community Airdrops Players Nodes Creators Investors Contributors / Advisors So answer the most basic question: Who actually received those tokens? Not allocation percentages. Not tokenomics graphics. Not a circulating-supply figure. Actual recipients. If substantial amounts of AKE were genuinely distributed to independent community participants, then publish enough information for the market to verify that distribution independently: recipient addresses TxHashes distribution dates amounts claim / vesting mechanisms aggregate recipient counts Because: UNLOCK ≠ DISTRIBUTION And: A TOKEN MOVING TO ANOTHER WALLET DOES NOT PROVE INDEPENDENT OWNERSHIP. The relevant question is not simply whether tokens were technically “unlocked.” The question is: WHO ULTIMATELY CONTROLLED THEM? 2. WHO BENEFICIALLY CONTROLLED THE RELEVANT WALLETS? Material wallet relationships and transaction paths have already been preserved and submitted. I am not going to publish the complete map in advance. The question is straightforward: Were apparently separate wallets genuinely controlled by independent parties? If yes, the records can establish that. If not, the records can establish that too. Blockchain transactions do not disappear. Neither do exchange deposit and withdrawal records. 3. WHO WAS TRADING AKEUSDT WHILE THESE EVENTS OCCURRED? AKEUSDT experienced extraordinary periods involving: rapid price expansion major Open Interest growth deeply negative funding violent short squeezes concentrated liquidations sharp subsequent reversals The important question is not whether individual traders made or lost money. It is: WHO WAS ON THE OTHER SIDE OF THOSE TRADES? And more specifically: WERE ANY OF THOSE TRADING ACCOUNTS LINKED — DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY — TO PERSONS OR ENTITIES CONTROLLING MATERIAL AKE SUPPLY? Public blockchain data can answer part of that question. Exchange records can answer the rest. Those records include: KYC / beneficial ownership master / sub-account relationships API relationships deposit / withdrawal attribution order history positions P&L liquidation records There is no need to speculate about whether these records exist. They do. 4. @BINANCE — THIS IS AN ACCOUNT-ATTRIBUTION QUESTION @binance @cz_binance The central issue is no longer simply whether AKEUSDT pricing systems functioned mechanically as designed. The question is narrower: Who controlled the accounts trading AKEUSDT during the abnormal market events? And: Were those accounts linked, directly or indirectly, to wallets controlling significant AKE supply? That question cannot be answered by referring to an external price index. It requires account attribution. The relevant internal records can establish the answer. Those records should be preserved. 5. @AKEDOFUN — SHOW THE DISTRIBUTION @akedofun If AKE community allocations and airdrops were distributed as represented, then that distribution should be independently demonstrable. So demonstrate it. Show where the tokens actually went. Not where they were supposed to go. Not what category they were assigned to. Where they actually went. If a broad population of genuine independent users received these tokens, there should be a verifiable on-chain distribution trail consistent with that claim. This should not require trust. It should require only evidence. 6. BERLIN / PIEVERSE — THE QUESTIONS REMAIN OPEN Specific questions concerning the historical roles and relationships involving BERLIN, AKEDO, and Pieverse have also been preserved for regulatory review. @BERLIN_x_ @pieverse_io The relevant questions concern: actual operational roles contractual relationships knowledge of AKE-related operations wallet relationships exchange or trading relationships Pieverse has not provided me with a substantive response to the specific questions I previously raised. Those questions remain open. I am not asking for another general statement. I am asking for records capable of resolving them. Dates. Contracts. Roles. Wallet relationships. Exchange relationships. These are factual questions. They can be answered with factual records. 7. TO ANY REAL AKE AIRDROP RECIPIENT If you genuinely received an AKE community airdrop, I want to hear from you. You do not need to disclose your identity. Provide: TxHash date amount distribution / claim mechanism A verifiable transaction is enough to begin. If broad, genuine community distribution occurred, the community itself should be able to demonstrate that on-chain. 8. CALL FOR EVIDENCE If you possess original evidence concerning AKE / AKEUSDT, preserve it. Especially: wallet addresses TxHashes exchange transaction records historical positions orders liquidations funding / OI records allocation or vesting records market-maker or project communications original screenshots / archived materials If you independently possess evidence concerning potentially manipulative or disruptive trading activity, you may submit your own Form TCR to the U.S. CFTC based on facts you personally observed or independently verified. Do not copy another person's conclusions. Submit original evidence. Preserve the original files. The complete evidentiary record will not be litigated on social media. Material evidence has been preserved. Material evidence has been submitted. Additional evidence will continue to be submitted when appropriate. The public questions are deliberately simple: Where did the tokens actually go? Who ultimately controlled the wallets? Who controlled the relevant trading accounts? Who was trading AKEUSDT during the abnormal market events? @akedofun @binance @cz_binance @BERLIN_x_ @pieverse_io These questions have factual answers. The blockchain contains part of the record. The exchanges hold the rest. Preserve the records. Answer the questions. $AKE #AKE# #AKEUSDT# #CFTC# #Crypto# #MarketIntegrity# #Tokenomics#