To put in perspective how rediculous the Tyler Robinson case is, let’s take a look at the Scott Peterson case. - Peterson was having an affair with a woman. He told this woman that his wife had died one week before her murder. - His affair partner worked with the police to record months of incriminating phone calls with Peterson - Peterson bought a boat right before the murder and didn’t tell anyone. He also never fished. On the morning of her murder his story was he was fishing for hours in his boat. - her body was found where he was “fishing.” - he had made several homemade cement “anchors” right before the murder - despite the current “everyone grieves differently” narrative, police actually take note when the spouse of the victim are caught fake crying and not really caring that much about the murder. Scott Peterson was observed acting like Erika Kirk for months. - there was no alternative theory to her murder or any alternative suspects. - his story changed several times and it appeared he was planning to flee to Mexico. Here’s the kicker. The court recently opened the case up to allow new evidence on an appeal. At no point did he media say “how dare you attack a widower. Everyone grieves differently.” Tyler Robinson: - Is not identifiable on camera shooting or even holding a weapon in an area with lots and lots of cameras. - there’s never been a demonstration officially or even on any YouTube channel that shows that the 30-06 could have possibly been the murder weapon. - it’s claimed he was hiding a 46 inch rifle with a scope in his skinny jeans. - he did not confess to police or any friend or family member outside of extremely suspicious text messages sent to a very suspicious guy who has been given immunity who’s dna is on the claimed murder weapon. - the crime scene was paved over 4 days after the event. - TPUSA employees are observed removing evidence from the crime scene. - Charlie Kirk’s body is not available for any testing. Neither are his clothing. Or any aspect of the crime. - no one was tested for gun powder or bomb residue - Tyler Robinson has no military experience and has been described as “not political.” - the states only witness has testified that Tyler Robinson “never mentioned Charlie Kirk.” - the entire investigation into the Charlie Kirk murder lasted a little over a day despite two other people confessing on the day of the killing. - the wife of the victim has been caught lying about the doctor, stating that he said “Charlie had a neck of steal” which explained why there was no exit wound. The doctor has denied that. - the testimony of turning point USA employees have changed several times since the event, and at no point do they appear to be curious who actually killed Charlie Kirk. - Erika Kirk is very angry about people trying to figure out who killed her husband. She feels really bad for the guy she claims killed her husband. - when Charlie Kirk was “shot” we can observe his security behave in a way that suggests they knew there was no longer any threat whatsoever that there could possibly be more shots. Several employees are seen quickly getting on their phones and not taking cover. - the victims wife has openly bragged about how much merch she sold the week of the murder after presenting herself to the world the fireworks dressed like a promiscuous Disney princess. - Charlie Kirk was publicly very against a war that started pretty soon after his murder. - his close circle of friends and political allies have made billions of dollars in profit from the war that started right after his murder. - TPUSA pays and requests influencers to attack anyone suspicious of their behavior, or anyone trying to figure out who actually killed their friend. The people directly profiting from the murder of Charlie Kirk, despite this overwhelming doubt, insist that Tyler Robinson be executed by the state. This proves they are completely capable of first degree murder. Hmmm