紫云(@dviolettchan):I was invited to review for NeurIPS 2026 and assigned 4 papers. 2 of 4 are complete AI slop and deserve strong rejects. They study homework-level problems, use overly lengthy yet uninformative language, and include obviously AI-generated method figures that are not even vector graphics. I just found an interesting shortcut for identifying these papers: check the number of references. The authors obviously did not systematically survey the area, and many of these papers cite fewer than 20 works in total.

紫云

@dviolettchan

参加 December 2021

585 フォロー中 5.8K ファン

紫云@dviolettchan

2026.06.20 06:35

I was invited to review for NeurIPS 2026 and assigned 4 papers. 2 of 4 are complete AI slop and deserve strong rejects. They study homework-level problems, use overly lengthy yet uninformative language, and include obviously AI-generated method figures that are not even vector graphics. I just found an interesting shortcut for identifying these papers: check the number of references. The authors obviously did not systematically survey the area, and many of these papers cite fewer than 20 works in total.

337

コミュニティへ転送

人気のあるユーザー