.@beincrypto published a feature by Mohammad Shahid on the question regulators, courts, and compliance teams are all circling: who is responsible when an AI agent loses your money? Edge & Node CEO @rodventures opens the piece and is quoted throughout, alongside voices from @Nethermind and @MetaMask. The case study is May's Grok/Bankrbot exploit, where a Morse-code prompt injection moved an estimated $150K-$200K from a linked wallet. Rodrigo's argument in three parts: responsibility lands on the company that deployed the agent, never on the model. Most companies can show the transaction but cannot produce the permission behind it. And the agent should never hold the keys, it proposes a payment while a separate system decides whether that payment is permitted. Full piece: