Eli Lifland(@eli_lifland):Interesting that Dario thinks that pacing via inputs such as AI R&D compute is more gameable than pacing via safety evaluations/practices. Imo it's the opposite; e.g. a requirement to spend 90% of compute on external inference (and not R&D) seems fairly hard to game. While I am in favor of moving toward being able to pace based on safety evaluations/practices, these seem harder to define and more gameable to me; e.g. AIs or companies might game alignment evaluations, and making a judgment call on whether a safety practice is implemented appropriately seems potentially quite subjective.

Eli Lifland

@eli_lifland

AI forecasting and governance @AI_Futures_. Co-author of AI 2040: Plan A, AI 2027, and the AI Futures Model. Also @aidigest_, @SamotsvetyF. Prev @oughtinc

参加 February 2020

1.6K フォロー中 9.7K ファン

Eli Lifland@eli_lifland

2026.09.13 01:37

Interesting that Dario thinks that pacing via inputs such as AI R&D compute is more gameable than pacing via safety evaluations/practices. Imo it's the opposite; e.g. a requirement to spend 90% of compute on external inference (and not R&D) seems fairly hard to game. While I am in favor of moving toward being able to pace based on safety evaluations/practices, these seem harder to define and more gameable to me; e.g. AIs or companies might game alignment evaluations, and making a judgment call on whether a safety practice is implemented appropriately seems potentially quite subjective.