Feels like pooled lending protocols would benefit from a rate limit on the supply of an asset being deposited for collateral Like, if the current supply is 100m and the supply cap is 300m, the supply should only be allowed to go to 110m in the next 10 minutes. Nobody needs to deposit all 200m in one shot This matters because if/when an exotic asset is hacked, the impact of the hack is constrained by the size of the exit paths for that asset. Especially when you consider that many hacks are infinite mint bugs… there the size of the exits literally determines the size of the hack. Lending protocols are often the largest exits (DEX liquidity is usually pretty small). Having a “smart cap” that is a bit above current supply, which can adjust over a few hours to the true cap, would make a huge difference. It would have saved rsETH depositors $200m today This also raises an interesting point: asset issuers should want this too. If you are an asset issuer who issues receipt tokens which have a redemption delay, then you actually aren’t worried about a hacker redeeming with you. But you need possible exits to be as small as possible while not impeding normal users. High supply caps need to be seen as a liability, rather than a sign of stature.