Maksym Andriushchenko(@maksym_andr):i highly doubt that GLM-5.2 was benchmaxxed on PostTrainBench or heavily distilled from Claude models. anyone can inspect the traces (https://t.co/Jx8rOAgEcn): - the reasoning patterns overall look very reasonable. GLM-5.2 genuinely tries many very sensible approaches (see the screenshot below for everything it tried during a single post-training run on AIME!). - they are very diverse across different seeds, no mode collapse on a single post-training technique. - they are very different from Claude models. - see the thread below for more details. TL;DR: don't blindly trust benchmark *scores*. look at the traces and draw your own conclusions!

2026.07.05 09:04

i highly doubt that GLM-5.2 was benchmaxxed on PostTrainBench or heavily distilled from Claude models. anyone can inspect the traces ( - the reasoning patterns overall look very reasonable. GLM-5.2 genuinely tries many very sensible approaches (see the screenshot below for everything it tried during a single post-training run on AIME!). - they are very diverse across different seeds, no mode collapse on a single post-training technique. - they are very different from Claude models. - see the thread below for more details. TL;DR: don't blindly trust benchmark *scores*. look at the traces and draw your own conclusions!