$MRVL x $LITE
What the sellside thinks:
Stifel: Reiterates $MRVL Buy, $370 PT. The strategic logic is strong:
> Extreme codesign across AI fabrics.
> Scale-up integrated optics.
> Build a scaled U.S. transceiver supplier amid potential Chinese restrictions.
> Lock in laser supply (the real bottleneck).
Bernstein: A deal of this size “likely can’t be funded entirely with cash.”
> Dilution + integration risk is real.
Morgan Stanley: Marvell’s DSP client base includes optical module makers that compete directly with $LITE. This could undermine the supplier-neutral reputation $MRVL relies on.
> Could create a major potential conflict of interest that may put its current DSP revenue at risk.
Market reaction was clear: LITE +9–11% AH, MRVL -8%.
The bottleneck thesis doesn’t change.
Whoever controls the laser controls scale-up.
It is very important to pick the winners now.
A lot of you have been asking me to weigh in on the $MRVL / $LITE rumor.
IMO, the leak probably killed the deal (if not closed yet). $MRVL has been getting hit while $LITE has ripped higher, so any premium and the dilution just got meaningfully worse. Hard to see that deal closing on attractive terms now.
I think the idea makes sense, securing InP lasers is a pretty smart hedge if you’re worried about the CPO transition hitting your DSP franchise.
Feels like a cleaner and more realistic target at this point could be $AAOI…