Randall Balestriero(@randall_balestr):Close to what we are setting up with https://t.co/v8KSoNBKqM! two-phase review with quick rejection phase 1 (no rebuttal). And phase 1 reviewers need to validate/rebut an AI generated review. That, and all submissions are public, non-official reviewers can also comment live

Randall Balestriero

@randall_balestr

AI Researcher: From theory to practice (and back) Postdoc @MetaAI with @ylecun PhD @RiceUniversity with @rbaraniuk Masters @ENS_Ulm @Paris_Sorbonne

参加 April 2020

246 フォロー中 6.9K ファン

Randall Balestriero@randall_balestr

2026.09.21 21:19

Close to what we are setting up with two-phase review with quick rejection phase 1 (no rebuttal). And phase 1 reviewers need to validate/rebut an AI generated review. That, and all submissions are public, non-official reviewers can also comment live

Jiafei Duan@DJiafei

2026.09.20 12:39

Let’s say 50,000 ICLR submissions × 3 reviews × 2 hours = 300,000 hours, or 150 person-years of expert labor. Let’s use AI to fight AI slop. I would suggest adding an AI-only screening round, then send only the papers that pass to human reviewers. Let’s not break the system.