This will be a growing challenge for authors. At @ResearchHub we regularly received reviews that were longer than the manuscript itself. Whether a review was written with AI is secondary. What we need is an agreement on what is expected from authors. And obviosuly with AI we can have way more detailed reviews now! I am totally ok with a preprint co-existing with its reviews. I do not think authors should be expected to do every requested experiment, or even be asked for new experiments at all, unless a key control is missing. The preprint, the reviews and any follow-up experiments can simply co-exist to give the maximum context to the reader/AI agent Historically it has been a flex to do every experiment a reviewer asks for, but I personally do not see the logic. I never received funding for those experiments, and I may not even want them in my manuscript.