登録して招待リンクを共有すると、動画再生報酬と紹介報酬を獲得できます。

Shanaka Anslem Perera ⚡
@shanaka86
Author of The Ascent Begins. Independent Analyst. Money, geopolitics, AI, science, and sovereignty. Mapping the collapse and the reconstruction of order.
参加 July 2009
3.6K フォロー中    308.9K ファン
The most devastating thing in Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI is a name that does not appear in it. Jony Ive, Apple's former chief design officer, the guy who shaped the look of your iPhone, co-founded the hardware startup at the center of this entire case, and Apple did not sue him. Not named. Not accused. That omission is not mercy. It is the trap. Apple filed Friday against OpenAI, its hardware arm, its chief hardware officer, and one engineer. It alleges the hardware chief, a 24-year Apple veteran who led product design for the iPhone and Watch, told Apple staff interviewing at OpenAI to bring actual parts with them, batteries and logic boards, for show and tell. It also alleges an engineer kept his Apple laptop, exploited a particular bug that still let him into Apple's file storage, and pulled dozens of highly confidential documents after joining OpenAI. It then alleges OpenAI got one of Apple's own suppliers to run a proprietary metal-finishing process by letting it believe Apple had approved. Apple's phrase for the hardware business: “rotten to its core”. OpenAI says it has no interest in other companies' trade secrets. Nothing is proven as of yet. Take a close look at the line Tim & his team drew. U.S. California law protects your right to quit, compete, and carry your skills with you. Taste, judgment, genius, they leave when you leave. That rule is why Silicon Valley exists, and Apple just conceded it in writing by letting Ive walk untouched. What Tim / Apple says is not yours is the file. The part. The supplier. The process. And that is why sparing Ive is quite lethal. Think about it… Sam Altman’s only real defense now is to prove its device came from Ive's legitimate brilliance, not from Apple's schematics. Apple has forced OpenAI to rest its entire case on the shoulders of the one man Apple chose not to sue, while demanding an injunction, the return of every file, discovery inside the hardware unit, and, per the complaint, the redesign of unreleased products. Before a jury. Against a device due in 2027 and an IPO in preparation. Apple is not trying to win money here in this case. It is forcing OpenAI to prove, component by component, that the machine it is about to sell contains nothing but Jony Ive's mind, and no part of Apple's factory.
もっと見る