It’s not that we don’t ever constrain men in the workplace. It’s that you think all those constraints are good. Like, if somebody said directly, “if you make a sexual joke in a meeting, then you’re not fit for the office. That’s a weird thing to do. And it shows that you don’t understand how you’re supposed to behave in the workplace and you should just leave. You should be fired. You don’t belong in the boardroom” — lots of people would agree with that. They have no problem putting that kind of constraint on male behavior. But why is that materially different from me saying, “there’s no crying in the office. If you cry in the office, then you’re confused about what we’re up to here. It’s not appropriate. That’s not how we act in the workplace. If you cry, you should be fired and you just don’t belong there?” It’s not materially different. The difference is just that you think the constraints on men are good and the proposed constraints on women are bad.