๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

nept ๐ŸŒŠ
@0xNeptun
you are the yield
๊ฐ€์ž… November 2014
766 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    643 ํŒฌ
who do you think is more worried?
i love competition and for the first time in a while @tether and @circle might have a real competitor if they play their cards right iโ€™m well aware of how difficult this is. competing with USDT and USDC is mostly a distribution game. what i find most interesting is the revenue model; the companies backing OUSD will actually be able to earn from the underlying yield, giving them a direct financial incentive to integrate and promote it across their own products. thatโ€™s a pretty different dynamic from what weโ€™ve seen until very recently with the hyperliquid/circle deal it wonโ€™t be easy and they might even be underestimating how much work(and resources!!) this will take, but itโ€™s definitely something iโ€™ll be keeping an eye on
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ