๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Eunice | Monad Foundation
@0x_eunice
Cofounder, GM @monad (weโ€™re hiring!), prev @mit @bwaytech @shutterstock @bankofamerica
๊ฐ€์ž… December 2010
536 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    75.2K ํŒฌ
The question was: Do apps or blockchains own the user? My take is that it's the EXPERIENCE that captivates an audience. An app has to constantly iterate to keep its users - to bring the best experience possible. While Uber/Lyft offered a better English language uiux than a local Koren ride-hailing app, the drivers I was matched with on Tada offered a much more pleasant experience. I became a temporary user. If the original iPhone didn't change, if Twitter never evolved from the 140 character max... other products bringing better experiences would have taken hold. The same holds true for the blockchain stack. Build and evolve for the continued improved experiences of your users and audience. -- ty to @alexlimasia for the Tada app rec... still have ptsd from some of those Seoul uber rides ๐Ÿ˜ฐ
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ
#HSCLifeRules# - Eunice Giarta (@0x_eunice), Co-Founder at @monad Foundation, HSC Conference Seoul, October 1 Instead of apps owning something, or the blockchain owning something, I think it's actually the experiences that own an audience. I'm not sure there's any such thing as true brand loyalty anywhere, or true app loyalty In Seoul a friend recommended I try TADA. The UI is a little different and there's some Korean I navigate with context clues. Sample size n of one, but the experience is better, so I'll use it for the rest of my trip even though I usually use something else. Whether it's an app with a good experience for end users or a blockchain with one for developers, I think that's where the moat lies #HSCSeoul#
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ