๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Seth
@0xseth_
Observing RWAs + stablecoins | Research driven frameworks
๊ฐ€์ž… June 2024
602 ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    1.2K ํŒฌ
A good percentage of RWA tokens and assets are being used like a photocopy of the real thing. You hold them to prove you own the asset, not to do anything with it. Which means most of that value just sits there; onchain gold lending is still under 1 in 500 dollars of what's been tokenized. BlackRock mints a token, Franklin mints a token, TVL climbs, and the asset just sits in a wallet, doing less than the paper version could. Flip that, and the token stops being a certificate and starts being a tool: something you can borrow against, trade on, or stack yield through, all without ever selling it. Two things kept this from happening sooner: โ–ซ๏ธ Nobody had settled who's on the hook when RWA collateral needs liquidating, since it can't just be dumped on the open market like a crypto asset. That question stalled most lending protocols from building for it. โ–ซ๏ธ There was no depth to plug into. Isolated markets for tokenized stocks, credit, and treasuries barely existed a year ago, so even willing builders had nothing liquid to connect to. Both constraints are loosening. @kamino , @Morpho , and @pendle_fi already have real markets live, and the platforms moving now are the ones that'll own the utility phase of this category. Great article by pink brains, worth reading ๐Ÿ”ป
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ