๊ฐ€์ž… ํ›„ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋งํฌ๋ฅผ ๊ณต์œ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋™์˜์ƒ ์žฌ์ƒ ๋ฐ ์ดˆ๋Œ€ ๋ณด์ƒ์„ ๋ฐ›์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Šต๋‹ˆ๋‹ค.

Camilo Acosta
@CamiloBAcosta
Founder & GP @PerceptiveVC. Prev: gen AI @Meta, exited CEO / founder, @princeton. Colombian immigrant living the American Dream ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ
๊ฐ€์ž… May 2008
2.6K ํŒ”๋กœ์ž‰ ์ค‘    3.8K ํŒฌ
I've seen a lot of frankly dumb takes on Instinct's raise. The product is free, and the inference behind it is ludicrously expensive. For context, Anthropic's $200/month plan can cost $3-6K a month per user to service. So why raise $350M, and potentially another $1B? Because if you're giving this away, you need an enormous balance sheet. And your biggest competitor has limitless cash AND compute (Muse). Why invite-only? Partly hype. But mostly cost control. You can't let a million users onto a free, inference-heavy product overnight unless you're prepared to burn through a fortune in tokens (which Meta is doing). Instinct might win the category or it might not. But seeing a billion-dollar valuation, saying it's the next Clubhouse, and calling it a VC hype cycle without running the math is lazy analysis. But hey, that's most VCs on X ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ
๋” ๋ณด๊ธฐ